Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Power

The Royal “WE”

In the battle for our energy future, we’ve seen some pretty devious attacks on rooftop solar, and the latest salvos from Wisconsin’s We Energies are in the running for top honors. If you followed recent attacks on net metering in Arizona, you have an inkling of what’s going down in the Midwest.

wisconsin solar

Here’s the skinny: We Energies is in the midst of asking regulators to approve a $9.1 billion acquisition of Chicago-based Integrys. The deal purportedly includes a promised rate freeze for WE’s new Illinois customers and a potential shift of corporate headquarters to Chicago.

Meanwhile, back in Wisconsin, WE is attacking their own ratepayers by proposing exorbitant charges for solar customers, an increased fixed charge for all customers, and a ban on third-party ownership (i.e. financing) of rooftop solar installations — a business model that has the rooftop market booming in lower- and medium-income neighborhoods.

But don’t worry, it gets worse…

WE has rooftop solar in its crosshairs, but the only evidence it has to support its attack is a study it commissioned and paid for in 2009 that actually found solar was a net benefit to all ratepayers. So, WE’s proposals are not only insidious but also contradicted by its very own research!

In other words, the Wisconsin Public Services Commission is on the verge of endorsing its state’s fall to the bottom of the solar policy barrel in order to benefit a corporate utility with zero credibility.

This is a big decision that could have national impacts on ratepayers and the future of solar energy. The fact that WE is trying to force it through without providing any qualitative evidence is another example of WE’s monopolistic hypocrisy. Which is probably why its proposal is drawing opposition from solar advocates, businesses, and groups representing senior citizens and low-income customers.

If WE was granted regulatory permission to implement all of these changes, Wisconsin would instantly become the worst state in the country for solar policy. (And the initials “WE” would take on a pretty disgusting layer of irony.) This is just another in a long line of monopoly utilities attempting to expand their monopolies while putting their customers through a gauntlet of fees — all in the name of protecting corporate profit margins.

It’s up to the Wisconsin PSC to do the right thing and stop WE’s money grab. We’ll be watching.

Image: Wisconsin solar rooftop by mjmonty | CC BY 2.0 license

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

is an independent media strategist based in San José, CA. You can read his many musings on Twitter @pjallen2.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

Originally published at ILSR.org After moving to Colorado, Joe Smyth found he was barred from participating in his generation and transmission cooperative — despite...

Clean Power

I recently wrote an article about the threat to rooftop solar net metering — and thus rooftop solar power growth — in California. Then,...

Clean Power

On Monday, I wrote about an uplifting new law in France that will get a lot more solar power installed in the country. Under...

Cars

Some companies have a deep social mission. Some companies spend years trying to figure out who they are and why they exist. And some...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.