Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica

Clean Power

SolarCity’s Planned 1 GW Solar PV Plant Will Cost Up To $450 Million

Image Credit: SilevoWhile SolarCity’s recent acquisition of the solar PV panel manufacturer Silevo has certainly opened up a number of interesting options for the company, none of them are likely to be cheap.

According to recent reports, SolarCity’s newly planned 1 GW integrated PV manufacturing plant for Silevo’s technology is expected to cost somewhere between $400–$450 million.

Deutsche Bank analyst Vishal Shah commented on that figure in a recent research note to investors, noting also that SolarCity’s goal of completing the largest solar PV manufacturing plant in the US was still on schedule for 2016. Negotiations with the state of New York are reportedly under way.

The note also mentioned that the company is expecting its own capital expenditure contribution for the project to “only” be in the several hundred million dollars range — which means that the company will likely need to make a secondary public offering of stocks in order to fund it.

Shah also stated that he was expecting SolarCity to continue to see “strong near term bookings momentum” — possibly resulting in the company exceeding its projected 2015 deployed guidance, which currently is set at somewhere between 900 MW and 1,000 MW.

While on the subject, when the deal between SolarCity and Silevo was first announced, we covered the possibilities in great detail. While the news above is of course the most expected action following the acquisition, there are still some other things to consider as well, such as the effect that acquisition will/could have on the “overall solar picture”. The linked article is worth a read in my opinion.

[Update] Here’s an important comment from one of our readers (slightly edited):

The actual note stated a “few” hundred million. A nuance, but reflects a more minimal net capex requirement as opposed to the critical view $1.5 billion of net capex needed.

Also, the “secondary” has a high probability of being mostly as convertible bond offering. The day of the Silevo announcement, Lyndon Rive stated this, so it is absolutely no secret or revelation that they would be doing a convertible offering. It’s only fair you mention this, but seems to be left out for some reason.

SolarCity’s latest ABS was three times oversubscribed, so there potentially could be a strong demand for the convertible bond as well. This is important information since it would arguably indicate SolarCity could raise the required capital at favorable terms minimal short term dilution.

Image Credit: Silevo

 
Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
 
 

Advertisement
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

Comments

You May Also Like

BIPV

There are many things in the cleantech world that are inspiring and fun, but there's perhaps nothing that quickly inspires more joy than seeing...

Cars

What exactly is Elon Musk's history with Warren Buffett?

Cars

How did Elon Musk grow into the business maverick he is today? It didn't come easy. Even though the 48-year old tech titan Elon Musk...

Batteries

A little more than 4 years ago, I published an article about why people loved Elon Musk so much. Given that it's still #ElonMuskDay...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.