Plastic “Graphene” Solves The Problem

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

A research team from the Korea Institute of Science and Technology has just come up with a novel solution to the graphene problem: no graphene! While graphene has practically limitless uses in solar power and other clean tech applications, the finicky material is difficult to work with, and the hunt has been on to find more compliant substitutes with similar properties.

plastic graphene courtesy of KIST
Plastic “graphene” nanosheet ( courtesy of KIST).

Graphene And Moore’s Law

For those of you new to the topic, researchers at the Energy Department’s Berkeley lab describe graphene as “a special kind of semi-metal.” It is simply a thin sheet of carbon, with thin being thisthin, as in one atom thin. That nanoscale structure provides graphene with unique electronic properties along with a strength far out of proportion to its size.

Since its discovery in 2004, graphene has breathed new life into Moore’s Law, a 1970’s-era prediction that the speed and efficiency of computers will double every two years, as more and better transistors get packed into smaller and smaller integrated circuits.

Solving The Graphene Problem

The problem with graphene is that it is notoriously difficult to manufacture at commercial scale, so its potential for application to solar cells has not yet been fully realized.

According to the Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), the method of choice so far is an eight-step process that involves creating a slush of graphene flakes, gasifying it, and then using a chemical vapor deposition process to layer a  film of graphene onto a metal substrate.

After all that, the graphene sheet has to be separated from the metal and applied to another substrate, which makes it vulnerable to nanoscale wrinkling and other unintended modifications that can interfere with performance.

As part of the solution, researchers have been racing to find alternative substrates to metal, with quartz (aka silicon dioxide) emerging as a favorite.

The KIST graphene solution was to ditch the graphene completely, subbing in a polymer (aka plastic).

The polymer, called PIM-1, for polymer of intrinsic microporosity-1, has a “rigid ladder” structure that mimics the classic chickenwire structure of graphene.

With their specialty polymer in hand, the team came up with a deposition process that based on carbon fiber rather than gas.

The KIST process consists of only two steps. First, a thin layer of PIM-1 is spin-coated onto a quartz substrate. Next, it is subjected to a heat treatment at 1,200 degrees centigrade, and Bob’s your uncle.

The result is a transparent, conductive carbon nanosheet which the KIST team claims is “as effective as graphene.”

You can take their word for it, or you can check their findings in the Royal Society of Chemistry journal Nanoscale under the header “One-step Synthesis of Carbon Nanosheets Converted from a Polycylic Compound and Their Direct Use as Transparent Electrodes of ITO-free Organic Solar Cells.”

ITO, btw, refers to the layer of indium tin oxide typically used in conventional organic solar cells.

Onwards And Upwards For Organic Solar Cells

If this is starting to sound an awful lot like an organic solar cell (aka a solar cells based on a polymer instead of silicon), that’s basically what it is.


While silicon is still the gold standard for solar tech in terms of efficiency, organic solar cells can trade that off with lower costs and greater flexibility in application, including transparent solar cells.

The KIST team is not alone in hitting upon the idea of transferring graphene characteristics onto organic solar cells.

You could also end up with a souped-up organic solar cell that incorporates graphene itself, a route being pursued by a Singapore research team.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Tina Casey

Tina specializes in advanced energy technology, military sustainability, emerging materials, biofuels, ESG and related policy and political matters. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on LinkedIn, Threads, or Bluesky.

Tina Casey has 3142 posts and counting. See all posts by Tina Casey

6 thoughts on “Plastic “Graphene” Solves The Problem

  • You made a nice report here recently (link) on Japanese research producing a conductive carbon foam in a rather similar way: creating a 3D polymer structure inspired by sugar bubbles, then baking it.

    How many atoms thick are the fibres making up the lattice? The coarser structure may well be an advantage in fabrication. Semiconductors are still far from the single-atom dimensions of true graphene.

    Its unclear from the press release how they peel the sheet off the quartz substrate. The photo of a 15mm square sample (with KIST logo) suggests they do. You can’t bake organic solar cells at 1200C.

  • Great post Tina ! Thanks ! This could really change things in a lot of technology areas!

  • But, a polymer is a plastic which is made out of oil (aka petrol) … ! The whole solar panel thing is about not using petrol, and of course, coal, gas,…

    • We know how to make plastics using non-petroleum feedstock.

      And, if properly recycled or put in a landfill, petroleum plastics don’t add to the atmospheric CO2 load.

      • Yes, we could phrase this as not pulling oil out of the ground to refine it, immediately burn it, to dump the oxidized remains into the atmosphere, as pollutants.

  • “commonly used in Britain and Commonwealth nations…Bob’s your uncle” is an exclamation that is used when “everything is all right” and the simple means of obtaining the successful result is explained.” – Wikipedia

Comments are closed.