Reducing Australia’s Renewable Target Would Lead To Increase In Electricity Prices

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Originally published on Renew Economy.
By Sophie Vorrath

Scrapping or winding back Australia’s Renewable Energy Target would lead to significant increases in electricity prices, while delivering a windfall profit to power companies of as much as $70 billion, according to new analysis from Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

The analysis shows that scrapping or reducing the renewable target would strongly favour power companies over consumers, causing power prices to surge after just a few years, due to less supply and competition in the power markets.

The BNEF study – a White Paper released by the Sydney analysis team on Monday – is not the first to come to this conclusion; among others, energy market analysts ROAM Consulting released a report last month saying that repealing the RET would increase reliance on fossil fuelled generation and eventually push power prices higher.

But it is one of the first to put a figure on the enormous windfall Australia’s incumbent energy generators stand to gain if the current Abbott government review of the RET delivers the expected outcome.

If the RET is cut, says BNEF, existing electricity generators would receive an extra $11.5 billion in revenue between 2015 and 2020, and a massive $70.2 billion between 2015 and 2030.

If the target is reduced, the study finds that existing generators would receive an extra $6.1 billion between 2015 and 2020, and $40.3 billion between 2015-30 – the majority of the extra revenue flowing to coal-fired power stations, which dominate Australia’s current power mix.

“Cutting or reducing the Renewable Energy Target is likely to result in less competition among fossil-fuel power generators and strong future increases in the price of electricity,” said Kobad Bhavnagri, Bloomberg New Energy Finance’s head of Australia. “This helps to explain why many of Australia’s largest power companies are now pushing for a reduction in the target,” he said.

It also puts a price on the cost to consumers, noting that if the target is abolished, the average household can expect to pay at least $142 (6%) more on their annual power bill by 2030, as no savings are made to wholesale power prices but legacy generation assets continue to be compensated.

On top of this, power sector emissions would be 5 per cent higher and 11,100 fewer people would be employed, as small-scale PV remained the only viable clean energy industry.

Reducing the target, says BNEF, would shelve between $12 billion and $21 billion of investment in clean energy, lead to 3 per cent higher carbon emissions and power price increases of $16 a year (1%) in 2020 for the average household, and $68 (3%) a year in 2030.

As it stands now, however, BNEF says the 45TWh Renewable Energy Target would drive around $35 billion of clean energy investment by 2020, employ 25,000 workers each year, reduce emissions from power generation by 5 per cent and prevent future surges in power prices by supplying electricity for 20-25 years with no ongoing fuel costs.

The report notes that this renewable energy growth would come at minimal cost to end-consumers of around $0.5 billion a year from 2015-20, with 24,800 workers employed each year in construction and operations. But over the longer term – from 2015-30 – it would save end-consumers around $2 billion a year, as reductions to wholesale electricity prices outweighed the costs of the policy

“This is because renewables like wind and solar – which have no fuel costs – push down the price of producing power from coal and gas on the wholesale markets. In only four years, this more than offsets the cost of building the new wind and solar power stations under the Renewable Energy Target,” Bhavnagri said.

“For an accurate assessment you have to look at both sides of the equation – what do the assets cost to build, but then how much money do they save. Governments and power companies that stand to profit handsomely from abolition of the scheme have so far only talked about the costs. But that’s like only talking about the costs of buying a new house and forgetting that you don’t have to pay rent anymore,” he added.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Guest Contributor

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.

Guest Contributor has 4313 posts and counting. See all posts by Guest Contributor

9 thoughts on “Reducing Australia’s Renewable Target Would Lead To Increase In Electricity Prices

  • A$80 billion in future revenue buys a lot of politicians today. The one thing that can stop the renewables revolution now is plutocratic corruption (Am.E: “protected political speech”).

  • If this happens, the utillities can still forget about their profits.

    If electricity prices in Australia skyrocket, solarpanel sales for residential and commercial will skyrocket too and they are allready skyrocketing without removal of the RET. What you also will see is that storage will hit grid parity sooner if electricity prices skyrocket, not to mention residential/commercial (vertical) windturbines, efficiency and conservation will be even more lucrative. Soon after that industrial will, hopefully, follow sweet.

    It’s inevitable, the utillities in Australia are doomed. Only the oil industry might benefit off of this, unless people and businesses start going EV to save even more costs. Then they are doomed too.

    • What the Government will further do to protect the Utilities is remove the “feed-in” tariff rates. Nothing but an idiotic, corrupt, backwards thinking, anti-green Liberal Government.

      • which will force people to buy storage and go of grid, like I said doomed!!!

        • What about people who live in apartments and don’t have roof rights for solar panels or space for a battery room?

          • There will be companies selling PV shares I guess. And battery room? Have you checked the size of a 10kWh system recently.. not bigger than a small fridge.

          • community solar, vertical windturbines on roof, storage in basement.
            besides, you can allways ask the owner, what does he care, as long as you pay for it, it will improve buildingvalue.

  • Dirty air, more costly power. Whats not to love!

    • Whats not to love!

      Well… it doesn’t cancel Christmas.

      But don’t worry, Tony Abbott is on it!

Comments are closed.