Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



North Carolina Locks Barn Door After Coal Ash Escapes

We’ve been following the coal ash disposal issue ever since the massive Emory River coal ash spill of 2010 (remember that?) in Tennessee, which triggered a flurry of regulatory proposals that have pretty much gone nowhere. That all might be about to change, at least for the current epicenter of coal ash disasters, North Carolina. In the aftermath of this month’s Dan River coal ash spill in North Carolina, two Republican members of that state’s legislature have announced that they will co-sponsor a bill to eliminate coal ash dumps.

Dan River coal ash spill

Door (locked) by rightee.

Fallout From Dan River Coal Ash Spill Crosses The Aisle

If it’s somewhat surprising to you that two Republican lawmakers would go out on a limb to challenge longstanding coal industry practice (that is, storing the byproduct of coal fired power plants in open coal ash lagoons), join the club.

However, it’s worth noting that the Dan River coal ash disaster really hit home for these particular two lawmakers.

According to a report at, the two announced co-sponsors, State Senate Rules Chairman Tom Apodaca and House Environment Committee Vice-Chairman Chuck McGrady, themselves live near a pair of coal ash dumps in a different area of North Carolina near Asheville, at French Broad (who knew?) River.

Tests have shown that those two dumps are contaminating local groundwater (not an uncommon problem with coal ash dumps), so it kind of makes you wonder if the two would have sprung into action if they happened to live in some other area where their property values were not at risk, but let’s not look a gift horse in the mouth.

Let’s also note for the record that just over this past weekend, a 5,000-gallon fuel oil spill was also reported in a creek leading to the same unlucky river.

Dan River Coal Ash Spill Update

To catch you up on other news about the Dan River coal ash spill, as you may know it started with the failure of a stormwater drain under the coal ash storage lagoon leading to the river, and now officials are concerned about the structural integrity of a second drain.

Meanwhile, concerned about the lack of activity on the state level, federal authorities have stepped in to convene a grand jury investigating a “suspected felony” in relation to the spill from the first drain, which had been reported on February 2.

As for any prospect of regulation at the federal level, after the 2010 Emory River coal ash spill the US EPA proposed new rules for coal ash disposal, which coincidentally — after a years-long wait — are nearing the stage of finalization, so stay tuned.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Keep up with all the latest clean tech news from CleanTechnica: subscribe to our newsletter.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Tina specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.


You May Also Like


Cutting global heating emissions relies in huge part on electrifying transport. Electrifying transport relies on massively scaling up mining & processing of a handful...

Clean Power

Yesterday, Governor Roy Cooper spoke at the North Carolina Medium- and Heavy-Duty (MHD) Electric Vehicle State Policy Bootcamp to highlight how crucial electrifying MHD...

Clean Power

NET Power is developing a new process for capturing carbon emissions from a natural gas generating station.

Clean Transport

In the future, the high demand for EV charging is something that will need to be addressed. Despite more and more EV charging stations...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.