Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



Elon Musk Hyperloop Details To Be Announced Aug 12 (Best Guess Below)

On Twitter, Elon Musk recently announced that the Alpha design for his Hyperloop high-speed transport concept would be available by August 12, and that suggestions are appreciated. Here’s the tweet:

Elon also said that this would be an open source project. (The point of open source projects is to enable anyone to build on and improve them, but without greedily taking control of them in order to prevent others from distributing them.)

The Hyperloop concept might use MAGLEV propulsion (Magnetic levitation), and it has been stated that the Hyperloop should be able to go up to about 1,000 miles per hour. MAGLEV propulsion is literally frictionless, as MAGLEV vehicles do not rub or roll against any solid materials. Remove air from the equation, and the concept becomes extremely fast and extremely efficient, but with only 1G of force, keeping passengers as comfortable as possible (although I do know that many people love riding in high-speed vehicles because of their high G force). But we’re yet to find out if Musk’s idea really includes MAGLEV technology.

“The system would, according to Musk, be able to travel from downtown Los Angeles to downtown San Francisco in under 30 minutes,[2] or 343 miles (552 km) at more than 685 mph (1,102 km/h)[3],” the Wikipedia article on the Hyperloop states. “Musk first announced the Hyperloop in July 2012 at a PandoDaily event in Santa Monica, California.[4] Musk estimated the cost of the SF-LA Hyperloop would be about US$6 billion, one tenth as costly as the proposed high speed rail serving those cities. He has revealed that the Hyperloop is not the same as a vacuum tunnel.[5]

The guess at Elon’s design that Elon has said is most similar to what he has worked up is here:

All the modes of transportation in mainstream use today were developed decades ago and have been in use for decades — trains, buses, cars, and bikes have been around for more than a century.

They all have their benefits and drawbacks, but they are facing growing problems, as well as some of the same old problems they had from day one. For typical, personal, gasoline-powered cars, these include extremely high cost of ownership, high accident risk, and low efficiency.

How many times are people killed in train, ship, or plane accidents compared to personal cars? Not many. Yet cars are widely used for intercity travel. One way to make inherently safes public transit the norm is to make it better than personal car transit. For example: high speeds and much comfort… at an affordable price.

This is more difficult than it sounds, as everything comes at a cost. However, the Hyperloop concept is claimed to be about 1/10 of the cost of high-speed rail, despite being about 20 times faster. We’ll see.

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

writes on CleanTechnica, Gas2, Kleef&Co, and Green Building Elements. He has a keen interest in physics-intensive topics such as electricity generation, refrigeration and air conditioning technology, energy storage, and geography. His website is:


You May Also Like

Clean Transport

The first CyberTrucks will feature 4 motors and 4 wheel steering,


Tesla has reiterated its loose guidance for “50% average annual growth in vehicle deliveries” over a multiyear horizon.

Autonomous Vehicles

This is “part deux” to a previous article, “E-Mode: Applying First Principles To A Complicated Law That Many Drivers Don’t Know Exist.” In part...


In an interview with CNBC’s Andrew Sorkin this past week, General Motors CEO Mary Barra shared some interesting alternative facts about Tesla and how...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.