Clean Power

Published on April 17th, 2013 | by John Farrell


Utility “Gets Ready” For More Local Energy In Hawai’i

April 17th, 2013 by  

This post originally appeared on ILSR’s Energy Self-Reliant States blog.

Hawai’an solar advocates are celebrating after the island state’s largest utility, Hawai’ian Electric (HECO) filed a plan with the public utility commission to take a “proactive approach” to adding more distributed solar to their grid system.

Utilities across the country typically use “conservative blanket limits” on the amount of renewable energy allowed on local circuits (the power lines connecting to homes and businesses), generally 15% of peak load.  In most places, solar energy production falls far below these limits.  But in the few places where it’s not, customers wanting to generate their own electricity must pay for a “costly and time-consuming study of the potential impacts on their circuits.”

Such limits have previously created logjams of solar installations awaiting utility action. In 2012, for example, there were as many permits issued for new solar on the island of Oahu alone as in the entire state over the last decade.  In Honolulu, close to half of the building permits filed in recent years are for solar power.

From now on the utility hopes to stay ahead of the torrid pace of solar installations.  It’s a remarkable change of heart.

In 2010, HECO proposed a moratorium on new solar installations on many of the islands, but quickly retracted the proposal in the face of strong local opposition.  As more solar has been added to the grid with few ill effects, the utility has reconsidered.

Last October, HECO raised the limit on the their local circuits to 75 percent of minimum load (which roughly translates to 23% of peak) for certain smaller renewable energy systems.  The proactive approach in the utility filing means that HECO may soon follow California utilities, which raised their limit last year to 100 percent of minimum load, or near 50% of peak demand. (for more on this progress, see this infographic – How Archaic Utility Rules Stall Local Solar).

The changes are important, because Hawai’i is a solar industry bellwether, where the cost to produce solar electricity is already lower than retail grid electricity prices (grid “parity”).  The state’s solar market has already revealed the “beyond cost” barriers to solar, and – now – the potential solutions.  The adjustment by HECO and other island utilities around grid limits to solar removes the next level of solar obstruction.

Ultimately, the change indicates a recognition by the utility of the changing electricity system paradigm.  Namely, consumers are becoming producers, and want the rules to support their interest in self-reliance, energy savings, and local power generation.  A coming surge of cost-effective local solar means utilities must get ready.  HECO may be one of the first utilities to prepare, but it won’t be the last.

Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , , , , ,

About the Author

directs the Democratic Energy program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His seminal paper, Democratizing the Electricity System, describes how to blast the roadblocks to distributed renewable energy generation, and how such small-scale renewable energy projects are the key to the biggest strides in renewable energy development.   Farrell also authored the landmark report Energy Self-Reliant States, which serves as the definitive energy atlas for the United States, detailing the state-by-state renewable electricity generation potential. Farrell regularly provides discussion and analysis of distributed renewable energy policy on his blog, Energy Self-Reliant States (, and articles are regularly syndicated on Grist and Renewable Energy World.   John Farrell can also be found on Twitter @johnffarrell, or at

  • Otis11

    What they really need to do (from a purely financial standpoint) is set the goal solar = (peak load -average load) for each area and accelerate that installment as much as possible. If they were to try to pass this with an agreement that stated no additional PV could be added without battery back-up to aid in grid smoothing, they could limit the negative impacts on their bottom line. This would eliminate (most of) the costly peak power they have to purchase (or generate) which is normally sold at a loss. This means that they would delivering a fairly constant load to the end user, minimizing the cost of their energy and eliminating the need for grid infrastructure improvements.

Back to Top ↑