900 MW Of New Californian Solar Projects Approved By Secretary Salazar

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

900 megawatts (MW) of new solar energy projects in California have just been approved by U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar. 750 MW is from the McCoy Solar Energy Project and the other 150 MW are coming from the Desert Harvest Solar Farm.

Image Credit: Black Rock Solar (some rights reserved)
Image Credit: Black Rock Solar (some rights reserved)

The two new utility-scale projects will both be located in California’s Riverside East Solar Energy Zone, which is considered to be one of the most suitable areas for solar development.

“These renewable energy projects reflect the Obama Administration’s commitment to expand domestic energy production on our public lands and diversify our nation’s energy portfolio,” Salazar was quoted as saying in a Department of Interior press release. “In just over four years, we have advanced 37 wind, solar and geothermal projects on our public lands – or enough to power more than 3.8 million American homes. These projects are bolstering rural economies by generating good jobs and reliable power and strengthening our national energy security.”

Once completed, the $100 million dollar McCoy Solar Energy Project will be one of the biggest photovoltaic projects located on public lands in the Californian desert, covering 1,780 hectares of land and powering about 200,000 homes. The project will be developed, owned, and maintained by McCoy Solar, a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources. It’s estimated that peak construction will result in 600 temporray construction jobs and about 20 new permanent jobs.

The second project, the Desert Harvest Solar Farm, will cover about 489 hectares and create enough power to supply around 45,000 homes with electricity. “The facility will be equipped with single-axis tracking technology, an on-site substation and a 230-kilovolt line to the Red Bluff Substation, which will connect the project to the Southern California Edison regional transmission grid.” Peak construction on the project should result in the creation of around 250 jobs.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

James Ayre

James Ayre's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy.

James Ayre has 4830 posts and counting. See all posts by James Ayre

2 thoughts on “900 MW Of New Californian Solar Projects Approved By Secretary Salazar

  • “750 MW is from the McCoy Solar Energy Project ”

    “Once completed, the $100 million dollar McCoy Solar Energy Project will be one of the biggest…”

    do i understand correctly that 750 MW costs 100 million $??

    • Considering that a 750MW coal plant costs about one billion to construct I’d say that this is a deal. True it will only produce electricity part of the time but that electricity will be without on going fuel costs. It will also avoid the environmental costs of burning coal. Why anyone can’t see that solar is a better choice is beyond me. Comparing the costs of solar to coal is an apples to oranges situation. When you add in the climate issue solar is a “no brainer”. A hammer or the guppy in your fish tank could understand that solar is the way to go.

Comments are closed.