Published on February 26th, 2013 | by Zachary Shahan


Tesla May Have Lost $100 Million From NYTimes Story — Musk: “I’d Rather Tell The Truth & Suffer The Consequences”

February 26th, 2013 by  

Unfortunately, the biggest cleantech surprise of the month was probably a New York Times review of the East Coast Tesla Supercharger Network set up for the convenience of Model S owners. Despite many others (from CNN to Consumer Reports to Model S owners themselves) making the drive without a hitch, even in similarly horrible winter weather, New York Times reporter John Broder ended his test drive with the car on a tow truck (after some extremely questionable driving decisions… as well as notes that didn’t match up with Tesla’s own records).

As I expressed several times, media coverage of the story wasn’t of the highest quality. And while there was some hope that Tesla might come out on top due to all the attention it received from the controversy (and maybe still will in the long run), it seems the story might have initially cost Tesla tens of millions of dollars (or even around $100 million) from the negative coverage.

Well, Musk recently sat down with Bloomberg TV to discuss the story. The video published by Bloomberg TV (video below) includes this classic line right near the beginning: “Lots of people said, ‘It doesn’t matter if you’re right or wrong, you don’t battle the New York Times.’… To hell with that, I’d rather tell the truth and suffer the consequences, even if they’re negative.”

Unfortunately, it seems that the overall results (at least, as they can be quantified right now) were negative. “We did actually get a lot of cancellations as a result of the New York Times article,” Musk said. “It probably affected us to the tune of tens of millions, if not on the order of $100 million. So it’s not trivial”

Musk clarified that the loss wasn’t simply due to cancellations, but due to a drop in the company’s valuation. As far as orders go, he said, “there were probably a few hundred” order cancellations due to the New York Times story.

Musk didn’t go hard core on bashing John Broder, though. He said, “I don’t think it should be the end of his career. I don’t even think necessarily he should be fired. But, I do think he fudged, he fudged an article.”

Tesla Model S Production

Changing gears a bit (no pun intended), interviewer Betty Liu questioned Musk about production targets and such. Musk confirmed that the company is up to producing about 400 units of the Model S per week, and that the total target for this year is 20,000.

Musk also knocked down the myth that only early adopters are reserving the Model S. He notes that whenever a lot of Model S deliveries hit a particular area of the country, the reservations in that area actually increase. In other words, word of mouth is working well for the high-performing Model S, as one would hope.

“For every customer’s car that is delivered, we seem to sell an incremental 2 or 3 cars, as a function of that customer — on average. Some customers, it’s been like 20 cars.”

So, things are looking up.

Musk also discussed the steep learning curve that got the company up to producing 400 units of the Model S a week. He noted that they only produced 600 Tesla Roadsters a year. Getting production numbers for one week up to its previous annual output was a challenge, “a steep learning curve,” and that the company made some mistakes along the way. The assumption is that, with those mistakes out of the way, its production is now more efficient and running much more smoothly.

Congress: Not As Corrupt As We Think

Another interesting segment of the interview concerned Congress. Musk noted, “my overall impression of Washington is that it’s much less corrupt than people think it is. And thank goodness for it, because if it was corrupt, we’d be screwed. That’s not to say that there isn’t some amount of that that does go on. There actually are, I think, a preponderance of the leading House members and Senators… actually are quite idealistic, and do care about doing the right thing.”

Here’s the full video interview:


Check out our new 93-page EV report, based on over 2,000 surveys collected from EV drivers in 49 of 50 US states, 26 European countries, and 9 Canadian provinces.

Tags: , , , , ,

About the Author

is tryin' to help society help itself (and other species) with the power of the typed word. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director and chief editor, but he's also the president of Important Media and the director/founder of EV Obsession, Solar Love, and Bikocity. Zach is recognized globally as a solar energy, electric car, and energy storage expert. Zach has long-term investments in TSLA, FSLR, SPWR, SEDG, & ABB — after years of covering solar and EVs, he simply has a lot of faith in these particular companies and feels like they are good cleantech companies to invest in.

  • greenoptimistic

    I interviewed Elon Musk on Saturday and he explained a bit of how the Tesla Model S manages battery in cold weather. He also expressed his feelings towards using supercapacitors:

  • leafyev

    Motor Trend Right. Van Vong Wrong.

  • The take away from this interview:
    1) He’s meeting his crazily optimistic production goals many thought were impossible. Plans on increasing them even.
    2) His car sales are snowballing due to word-of-mouth from happy owners.

    3) He is paying back the government loan twice as fast as need be.

    • Great summary. Better than mine. 😛

      I do think it’s funny that Tesla keeps doing what everyone (well, naysayers) said was impossible. One thing at a time. And nailing them all so far. At this point, I have to say that I don’t think the company’s future is questionable at all. But I haven’t dug in as much as I could.

  • Van Vong

    shitty car. stop crying.

    • lol. shitty car? you must be out of your mind. this car got rave reviews all throughout the auto world. you are a trip.

  • If you are interested in censorship and made up stories read the New York Times

Back to Top ↑