Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
California, as most of you know, has a renewable energy target of 33% by 2020, one of the best around. However, if current trends are any indication of where the state is headed, it could blow past that target. According to a state regulator speaking this week on the matter, California's proposed solar projects in 2011 were a whopping 4.5 times what the state needs to meet its 33% target.

Clean Power

California May Blow Past Clean Energy Target.. or May Not

California, as most of you know, has a renewable energy target of 33% by 2020, one of the best around. However, if current trends are any indication of where the state is headed, it could blow past that target. According to a state regulator speaking this week on the matter, California’s proposed solar projects in 2011 were a whopping 4.5 times what the state needs to meet its 33% target.

california flag state

California, as most of you know, has a renewable energy target of 33% by 2020, one of the best around. However, if current trends are any indication of where the state is headed, it could blow past that target. According to a state regulator speaking this week on the matter, California’s proposed solar projects in 2011 were a whopping 4.5 times what the state needs to meet its 33% target. (As noted previously, the surge of renewable energy project proposals is actually causing huge traffic jam in the permitting process in California, and California is quite clear that it doesn’t need any outside help to meet its renewable energy goals.)

However, there is some concern about the projects proposed. First of all, only 6% of these projects have received approval from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Additionally, some insiders conjecture that firms are proposing projects that they won’t build themselves but will be sold to other solar power construction companies, and that the bids are too low.

“It does make me nervous,” commissioner Timothy Alan Simon told Reuters. “Is someone just bidding low to sit in the cue?” Mr. Simon believes projects submitted in the 7 cents per kilowatt hour range, for construction in 2015-2016, are unrealistically low, but he’s seeing such proposals come in.

Of course, low solar panel prices have helped solar installers and developers tremendously. And some may just be counting on increasing price declines, which we are also expecting. But I think an important point in the story above is that there’s a ton of competition in the solar marketplace right now, and developers are more than eager to make the most competitive, lowest bid (sometimes even unrealistically). Correct me if I’m wrong.

Note, though, that the CPUC is approving some beasts. I wrote 2-3 weeks ago on the news that it had just approved five renewable energy projects totaling 1,088 megawatts (huge, if you’re unfamiliar with the size of such projects).

Source: Reuters | California flag on state via shutterstock

 
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:



I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Advertisement
 
Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

The California Energy Commission has chosen Redflow to build a 20 MWh flow battery storage system near the town of Corning.

Buildings

Who has the most power in America? Oil companies? Political parties? Elon Musk? Nope, nope, and nope. The correct answer is insurance companies. Insurance...

Batteries

States with decarbonization goals must plan, prepare, and test for long-duration energy storage

Climate Change

LLNL and the Clean Air Task Force have released a new report "Sharing the Benefits: How the Economics of Carbon Capture and Storage Projects...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.