Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

# Solar Grid Parity 101

Solar grid parity, when installing solar power will cost less than buying electricity from the grid, is considered the tipping point for solar power.  It’s also a tipping point in the electricity system, when millions of Americans can choose energy production and self-reliance over dependence on their electric utility.

But this simple concept conceals a great deal of complexity.  And given the stakes of solar grid parity, it’s worth exploring the details.

## The Cost of Solar

For starters, what’s the right metric for the cost of solar?  The installed cost for residential solar (\$6.40 in 2011), or commercial solar (\$5.20), or utility-scale solar (\$3.75)?  Even if we pick one of these, it’s difficult to compare apples to apples, because grid electricity is priced in dollars per kilowatt-hour of electricity, not dollars per Watt.

Enter “levelized cost,” or the cost of a solar PV array averaged over a number of years of production.  For example, a 1-kilowatt (kW) solar array installed in Minneapolis for \$6.40 per Watt costs \$6,400.  Over 25 years, we can expect that system to produce about 30,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh), so the “simple levelized cost” is \$6,400 divided by 30,000, or about \$0.21 per kWh.

But people usually borrow money, and pay interest, to install solar power.  And there are some maintenance costs over those 25 years.  And we also use a “discount rate” that puts heavier weight on dollars spent or earned today compared to those earned 20 years from now.  A 1-kW solar array that is 80% paid for by borrowing at 5% interest, with maintenance costs of about \$65 per year, and discounted at 5% per year will have a levelized cost of around \$0.37.

That means that “solar grid parity” for this 1-kW solar array happens if the grid electricity price is \$0.37 per kWh.  But this calculation is location specific.

In Los Angeles, that same 1-kW system produces 35,000 kWh over 25 years, lowering the levelized cost to \$0.31.  The time frame also matters.

If we only look back at the Minneapolis project with a levelized cost of \$0.37, but instead look at the output over 20 years instead of 25 years, it increases the levelized cost to \$0.43, because we have fewer kWh of electricity over which to divide our initial cost.

We choose 25 years because solar PV panels have a good chance of producing for that long. (Though, some argue that the life span used should be at least 30 years.)

We also use a lower installed cost than the U.S. average.  Residential solar projects may average \$6.40 per Watt, but there are some good examples of aggregate purchase residential solar projects costing \$4.40 per Watt.  The levelized cost of solar at \$4.40 per Watt in Minneapolis is \$0.25; in Los Angeles it is \$0.21.

The following map shows the levelized cost of solar, by state, based on an installed cost of \$4.40 per Watt, averaged over 25 years (click for a larger version).

This map shows half our grid parity equation, the cost of solar.  But what about the other half, the grid price?  It’s another complicated question.

## The Grid Price

Utilities like to compare new electricity production to their existing fleet, which means comparing new solar power projects to long-ago-paid-off (amortized) coal and nuclear power plants that can produce electricity for 3-4 cents per kWh.  But this is apples to oranges, because utilities can’t get any new electricity for that price, from any source.

A more appropriate measure of the grid price is the marginal cost for a utility of getting wholesale power from a new power plant.  In California, this is called the “market price referent” and it’s around 12 cents per kWh.  The figure varies from state to state.

But, while the market price referent provides a reasonable comparison for the cost of utility-scale solar, it’s not the number that matters for solar installed on rooftops or near buildings.  In those cases, the power is used “behind the meter,” and depending on the type of state policy for net metering, the customer can essentially spin their electric meter backward when their solar panels produce electricity.  That means that solar power is really competing against the energy cost on a utility bill, known as the “retail price.”

The following map shows the average retail electricity price by state across the U.S.  It ranges from 8-10 cents in the interior to 15 cents per kWh and higher on the coasts (click for a larger version).

In general, the residential retail electricity price is the generally accepted grid parity price.  With this price and our previous map of the levelized cost of solar, we can assess the state of solar grid parity.  The following map shows the ratio of the levelized cost of solar to the grid parity price in each state.  Only Hawaii has reached solar grid parity without incentives.

As time rolls ahead, and grid prices rise while solar costs fall, the picture changes.  In five years (2016), three states representing 57 million Americans will be at solar grid parity: Hawaii, New York, and California.

There are other considerations in the grid parity calculation.

## Time-of-Use Rates

Some utility customers pay “time-of-use” rates that charge more for electricity consumed during times of peak demand, such as when a hot sunny day has everyone using their air conditioners.  Under these rates, a solar project can be replacing electricity that costs upwards of \$0.30 per kWh.  Over a year, time-of-use rates can (on average) boost the cost of electricity – at peak times, when solar panels produce a lot of power – by about 30 percent.  Assuming every state implemented time-of-use pricing (and that it was equivalent to a 30-percent increase in grid prices during peak times), solar grid parity would be a reality in 14 states in 2016, instead of just 3.

## Solar v. Grid Over Time

There’s one other calculation.  Let’s say that in 2011 solar still costs just a bit more than the grid electricity price, but that the grid price is rising at a modest rate each year.  In this case, solar may still be the right choice because the lifetime cost of solar (at a fixed price) will be less than the rising cost of grid electricity.  We can use an accounting tool called “net present value” to estimate the savings from solar compared to grid power over 25 years, and we find that, for every percentage point annual increase in electricity prices, solar can be ~10% more expensive than grid power today and still be at “parity.”  We find that with electricity price inflation of 2% per year, solar grid parity shifts up two years using this method.

To further explain the concept of solar grid parity, I’ve also created this slideshow below.

Solar grid parity has enormous implications for the electricity system and the time is drawing very close for many Americans.  I hope this post (and slideshow) helps to illustrate the complexity of the concept, and I’d appreciate your feedback via email (jfarrell@ilsr.org) or in the comments below.

Solar home via mlinksva

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

John directs the Democratic Energy program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His seminal paper, Democratizing the Electricity System, describes how to blast the roadblocks to distributed renewable energy generation, and how such small-scale renewable energy projects are the key to the biggest strides in renewable energy development.   Farrell also authored the landmark report Energy Self-Reliant States, which serves as the definitive energy atlas for the United States, detailing the state-by-state renewable electricity generation potential. Farrell regularly provides discussion and analysis of distributed renewable energy policy on his blog, Energy Self-Reliant States (energyselfreliantstates.org), and articles are regularly syndicated on Grist and Renewable Energy World.   John Farrell can also be found on Twitter @johnffarrell, or at jfarrell@ilsr.org.

### Cars

Honda (and GM) to fuel cell electric car fans: never give up, never surrender.

### Batteries

The US Department of Defense is finally leveling up its interest in electric vehicles, and Canoo is front and center.

### Clean Power

The refusal of 9 GW of green hydrogen electrolyzer proposals makes complete sense, and the hydrogen train is just the usual nonsense, but with...

### Clean Power

Virtual power plants were virtually unknown just a few years ago, and now the floodgates are open thanks in part to a Trump-era ruling.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.