Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
There are two ways to lower the cost of producing energy through photovoltaics – more efficient solar cells (more power per square foot) and lower production costs (lower cost per square foot). The ETAlab of the Fraunhofer ISE has devised a way to do both simultaneously. The research team in the laboratory for new solar cell structures and processing steps has not only made the solar cell contacts out of 100% cost-effective materials (replacing expensive silver with cheaper copper and nickel), but the process also increases the efficiency of the solar cell to a very respectable 21.4%.

Clean Power

Making Cheaper and More Efficient Solar Cells with Copper

There are two ways to lower the cost of producing energy through photovoltaics – more efficient solar cells (more power per square foot) and lower production costs (lower cost per square foot). The ETAlab of the Fraunhofer ISE has devised a way to do both simultaneously. The research team in the laboratory for new solar cell structures and processing steps has not only made the solar cell contacts out of 100% cost-effective materials (replacing expensive silver with cheaper copper and nickel), but the process also increases the efficiency of the solar cell to a very respectable 21.4%.

There are two ways to lower the cost of producing energy through photovoltaics – more efficient solar cells (more power per square foot) and lower production costs (lower cost per square foot). The ETAlab of the Fraunhofer ISE has devised a way to do both simultaneously. The research team in the laboratory for new solar cell structures and processing steps has not only made the solar cell contacts out of 100% cost-effective materials (replacing expensive silver with cheaper copper and nickel), but the process also increases the efficiency of the solar cell to a very respectable 21.4%.

In order to achieve a high level of efficiency, the front contacts in the solar cell not only have to exhibit a low level of loss with light-generated current but also cover the least amount of the cell surface possible. Technologically speaking, materials with high conductivity work best. Traditionally speaking, silver has been the metal of choice. In the current industry standard, the relatively wide and porous contacts are produced by screen-printing silver pastes. The ETAlab team’s switch from silver to copper reduced the cost by around 10%, due to the significant difference in price. The electro-plating processes necessary to generate the contacts with copper were also comparatively inexpensive.

Of course, copper and silver have different chemical characteristics despite conducting about the same amount of electricity, so the contacts aren’t quite built the same way. The challenge in constructing a copper contact was that the copper tended to leak into the semiconductor (which then means the solar cell slowly stops working altogether!). To stop the leakage, the ETAlab research team bound the copper to a silicon layer with nickel – which also conducts electricity and can be cheaply electro-plated, so double win there.

While the nickel/silicon/copper combination can be used with the silver screen-print, it can also be used without it. The anti-reflective coating (ACR) can be locally removed from the combination with processes like laser ablation, so that the line width is no more than 20 microns. A narrower line width means that less of the solar panel is shaded by its own contact. The opened range of the ARC nickel (reinforced with copper and tin or silver so that it can be soldered) is then selectively deposited.

The new process had one more advantage – one that the team wasn’t necessarily expecting. The copper-using cells not were not only as efficient as the more expensive standard cells, but they were more stable in the heat – the research team put it under a thermic load of 1600 hours at 392°F and the copper cells still worked just as well as they had in the beginning.

The next challenge is adapting the process for a larger solar array, as the prototype nickel/silicon/copper solar cell was smaller than 1”x1”. The Fraunhofer ISE will introduce the theme of long-term stable copper metallization and its results so far at the 26th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition this week in Hamburg.

Source | Picture: Oekonews.at

 


Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

 
 
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

spent 7 years living in Germany and Japan, studying both languages extensively, doing translation and education with companies like Bosch, Nissan, Fuji Heavy, and others. Charis has a Bachelor of Science degree in biology and currently lives in Chicago, Illinois. She also believes that Janeway was the best Star Trek Captain.

Comments

#1 most loved electric vehicle, solar energy, and battery news & analysis site in the world.

 

Support our work today!

Advertisement

Power CleanTechnica: $3/Month

Tesla News Solar News EV News Data Reports

Advertisement

EV Sales Charts, Graphs, & Stats

Advertisement

Our Electric Car Driver Report

30 Electric Car Benefits

Tesla Model 3 Video

Renewable Energy 101 In Depth

solar power facts

Tesla News

EV Reviews

Home Efficiency

You May Also Like

Clean Transport

Oshkosh debuts electric fire trucks and a whole EV system to boot, which could help put out that fire over its Postal Service fleet...

Batteries

The US Department of Defense is eyeballing energy efficient trucks and silicon EV batteries to cut down on climate-killing fossil fuels.

Clean Power

Courtesy of Union Of Concerned Scientists By Rachel Cleetus The G-7 Leaders’ Summit is underway, from June 11–13, in Cornwall, UK. As host nation for this...

Clean Power

The Gulf of Mexico is finally ready for its offshore wind power closeup, and the state of Louisiana is ready to pounce.

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.