On the eve of the first ever U.S. Army and Air Force joint Energy Forum, which will explore the future direction of U.S. energy policy in terms of national defense strategy, the U.S. House of representatives has just dialed the domestic energy clock back down to the 19th century. Lead by Texas Representative Michael Burgess, last Friday the House passed an amendment to an appropriations bill that effectively prevents the Department of Energy from implementing new energy efficiency standards for household light bulbs.
Energy and National Defense
Technologically speaking, the Burgess amendment time-travels U.S. energy all the way back to the invention of the incandescent light bulb, about 130 years ago. Back then, the U.S. Army was still using horses and the U.S. Air Force was just a twinkle in its mother’s eye. So yes, conventional incandescent technology is a bit out of step with our time.
Wait a Minute – Didn’t They Kill that Bill?
If you’ve been following the legislative trail of the pro-incandescent movement, news of the Friday’s victory may come as a surprise. That’s because a bill to repeal the efficiency standards was introduced in the House earlier this week and it failed on procedural grounds, much to the delight of U.S. light bulb manufacturers who have already moved on to new high-efficiency technologies. So that means the new efficiency standard is safe, right? Wrong! You know how persistent those zombies can be. Just when you think they’re down, they keep right on coming. The Burgess amendment stripped the implementation funding from the 2012 Energy and Water Appropriations Act, so guess what, no new standards.
Energy Efficiency and Incandescent Bulbs
As reported elsewhere in CleanTechnica, the new light bulb efficiency standards were set under a 2007 law that did not “ban” incandescents, but it did require manufacturers to invest in the R&D needed to create more efficient technologies. At the time, it didn’t look like there was much prospect for engineering a more efficient incandescent bulb, so the emphasis was on improving CFL and LED technologies. However, those intrepid U.S. manufacturers are also beginning to introduce new light bulbs that look and act exactly like traditional incandescent bulbs, only they meet the new efficiency standards.
And We Should Care Because…?
Considering how quickly U.S. manufacturers and consumers are adapting to new lighting technologies that save money, it does seem a little odd that the majority party in the House is spending so much of its energy on pushback. After all, there’s a couple of other things going on that need attention from our representatives in Washington. Couple of wars, bunch of people needing jobs, people needing help dealing with some big fires and tornadoes and floods and stuff…oh yeah, and the whole U.S. is about to lose its credit rating for apparently no reason. Well I guess some things are just more important than others.
Image: Incandescent light by FeatheredTar on flickr.com.
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:
I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
