Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
By a defunding measure in the Defense Appropriations bill, our new Tea Party/GOP House has just repealed a provision in the 2007 energy bill that says federal agencies may not substitute alternative fuels that are worse for our environment than petroleum - and yes, there are worse ones: some fuels made from coal, for example, can actually emit twice the greenhouse gases of petroleum. The requirement, Section 526, was a response to Senator Inhofe's amendment qualifying coal fuel as an "alternative fuel" back then.

Clean Power

Military Opposes GOP on Dirty Fuel Rule

By a defunding measure in the Defense Appropriations bill, our new Tea Party/GOP House has just repealed a provision in the 2007 energy bill that says federal agencies may not substitute alternative fuels that are worse for our environment than petroleum – and yes, there are worse ones: some fuels made from coal, for example, can actually emit twice the greenhouse gases of petroleum. The requirement, Section 526, was a response to Senator Inhofe’s amendment qualifying coal fuel as an “alternative fuel” back then.

By a defunding measure in the Defense Appropriations bill, our new Tea Party/GOP House has just repealed a provision in the 2007 energy bill that says federal agencies may not substitute alternative fuels that are worse for our environment than petroleum – and yes, there are worse ones: some fuels made from coal, for example, can actually emit twice the greenhouse gases of petroleum. The requirement, Section 526, was a response to Senator Inhofe’s amendment qualifying coal fuel as an “alternative fuel” back then.

However, Executive Order 13514 that President Obama signed into law in 2009 before the House changed hands – requires that all federal agencies cut their greenhouse gases by 28% by 2020, and that requires that they find cleaner alternative fuels. And no federal agency uses more fuel than the military.

That greenhouse gas reduction Executive Order is why the army and navy have been testing so many next-generation clean biofuels over the last few years, to substitute for dirty petroleum fuel as Tina Casey has covered extensively here.

But the new House Defense Appropriations Act would bar the use of federal funds for implementing Section 526, making it cheaper for the military to buy the dirtier fuel that harms the climate, which would push the military to disobey the order requiring cleaner fuels. So the defunding puts the military in a double bind and wastes all their considerable success in helping develop cleaner fuels.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, then, the military has come out forcefully against their proposal with a terse but strongly worded statement against any such weakening of support for clean fuel legislation by exempting the use of any federal funds for implementing section 526.

“This exemption could further increase America’s reliance on non-renewable fuels.  Our dependence on those types of fuels degrades our national security, negatively impacts our economy, and harms our planet.  This exemption would also send a negative signal to America’s advanced biofuel industry and could result in adverse impacts to U.S. job creation, rural development efforts, and the export of world leading technology”.

This opposition is significant. The DOD is the largest user of fuel in the country. So just this one federal agency has been able to jumpstart the development of clean next generation biofuel, and has had considerable success.

President Obama no doubt was fully cognizant of this in making the executive order, of the few pieces of greenhouse gas legislation he has been able to pass and one that has had an influence on the future of clean fuel development.

The opposition to the repeal by the military is a rare win for clean energy. Stay tuned…

Susan Kraemer @Twitter

 
 
 
Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Advertisement
 
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.

Comments

You May Also Like

Batteries

The US Army is testing a new flow battery that can suck up wind and solar energy like a high tech vacuum.

Green Economy

In another bad sign for fossil energy stakeholders, the apparel industry supply chain is focusing more attention on recycling pre-consumer and post-consumer petrochemicals.

Batteries

The US Army is pursuing new silicon energy storage technology for light weight, long lasting portable batteries.

Climate Change

Climate change is about extremes and adapting to those extremes. Brisbane experienced a 10-year drought from 2001 to 2011. During that time, washing your...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.