Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

CleanTechnica
UK startup Isentropic Energy has proposed the simplest of thermal energy storage systems, according to Powermag. Two large containers of gas and gravel, one hot (500C) and one cold (–160C) provide the temperature difference to operate a heat pump. Off-peak surplus wind power or solar energy is used to heat up the contents of the hot tank and to retain that temperature.

Clean Power

Another Cheap Way to Store Solar and Wind Power

UK startup Isentropic Energy has proposed the simplest of thermal energy storage systems, according to Powermag. Two large containers of gas and gravel, one hot (500C) and one cold (–160C) provide the temperature difference to operate a heat pump. Off-peak surplus wind power or solar energy is used to heat up the contents of the hot tank and to retain that temperature.

UK startup Isentropic Energy has proposed the simplest of thermal energy storage systems, according to Powermag. Two large containers of gas and gravel, one hot (500C) and one cold (–160C) provide the temperature difference to operate a heat pump. Off-peak surplus wind power or solar energy is used to heat up the contents of the hot tank and to retain that temperature.

No refrigerants, chemicals or water are used, and it has no particular geographic requirement, unlike several energy storage ideas currently in pilot testing. It could be cheap at utility-scale – as little as $10/kWh (one time, to build it), according to the company’s chief technology officer, Jonathan Howes, and the overall operating efficiency of the energy storage process is claimed to be 72% to 80%.

For this much energy storage, each tank of gas and gravel is the size of a small building, a little over 20 feet in height and in width, and the heat differential between the two containers (this size) operates a 6 MW heat pump. Scalability is possible. The company says that it could be scaled up: so larger containers could store more energy, and run a larger heat pump for longer.

According to Howes, it will cost about $16 million, and take up to two and a half years, to test the prototype’s ability to store and release 16 megawatt hours of power at a rate of 2 MW for 8 hours.

California is looking for energy storage now that 33% of our electricity is to come from renewable sources by 2020, ideally very fast releasing storage – in 1,000 MW units.

More energy storage is needed to even out the intermittency of renewables. To ensure a good match between the rise in renewables and storage – rather than haphazard storage development that might not be sufficient – a rising percentage of storage on the grid is mandated.

To keep the grid stable, storage that can release stored power within seconds are the most valuable to the renewable powered grid, as we see in the change in incentives now offered under new FERC director Jon Wellinghoff. It is also why General Compression’s Renewable Energy Storage that Ramps Up in Under 30 Seconds was selected by ARPA-E for funding.

FERC wants to offer higher payments to suppliers of fast storage, (FERC Wants Smaller, Faster, Distributed Storage to Speed Renewables) or at least to incentivize utilities to offer breaks to customers who conserve: Equal Pay for Negawatts and Megawatts Thanks to FERC.

Although Californian utilities do offer these “negawatts” incentives to large commercial users, some electric utilities in the South, typically coal-powered,  currently actually offer these customers a break for wasting more energy. So the waste of fossil powered energy there has an impact on climate change globally, which is currently being felt in the South with extreme weather. FERC has national jurisdiction, so the rule could impact greenhouse gases nationally.

 
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!
 

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:



I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Advertisement
 
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.

Comments

You May Also Like

Clean Power

Renewable energy projects are facing long and often expensive delays getting connected to the grid. Is there an alternative?

Clean Power

You don’t have to be an economist to know that inflation is one of the chief financial challenges facing Americans today. Key indicators point...

Fossil Fuels

Courtesy of NRDC. By Gillian Giannetti  NRDC, the Sustainable FERC Project, and more than 50 other organizations sent a clear message on May 26th to the Federal...

Clean Power

Why bury old coal power plants in the ground when you can repurposed them as super-duper energy storage systems?

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.