Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Green Economy

Benefits of EPA Regulations Far Outweigh Costs, Industry Lies

EPA building in D.C.

We hear all the time that new environmental regulations will cause considerable job losses. This is a straight lie. We hear all the time that we can only protect the environment at the expense of the economy. This is a straight lie.

A recent article by Ruth Greenspan Bell, a Senior Fellow in the Climate & Energy Program at the World Resources Institute (WRI) who was an EPA lawyer for 17 years before that, covers a number of macro-scale and micro-scale studies on this matter and shows us why we need to be more careful regarding the environmental regulation cost-benefit assumptions we make.

Here are some of the key findings Bell discusses:

  • Research extensively shows that the economic, public health and jobs-related benefits of environmental regulations far outweigh their costs.
  • Initial regulation cost estimates are often greatly exaggerated by industry studies.
  • Initial regulation cost estimates are even exaggerated by the EPA most of the time (meaning the costs end up being lower in reality).
  • The White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) recently reported in its thirteenth annual Report to Congress that “estimated annual benefits of major Federal regulations reviewed by OMB from October 1, 1999, to September 30, 2009, for which agencies estimated and monetized both benefits and costs, are in the aggregate between $128 billion and $616 billion, while the estimated annual costs are in the aggregate between $43 billion and $55 billion.”
  • Furthermore, this report found that the estimated annual costs of clean air and water regulations range from $26 to $29 billion whereas their benefits range from $82 to $533 billion (quite a difference).

Bell gets into much more detail on why industry and EPA cost estimates are routinely too high, some micro-scale case studies showing the same findings, and why environmental regulation is not a job killer. Check out the full piece on the World Resources Institute website: For EPA Regulations, Cost Predictions Are Overstated.

Connect with me on FacebookStumbleUponTwitter, or Care2.

Photo Credit: savethedave via flickr (CC license)

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Zach is tryin' to help society help itself one word at a time. He spends most of his time here on CleanTechnica as its director, chief editor, and CEO. Zach is recognized globally as an electric vehicle, solar energy, and energy storage expert. He has presented about cleantech at conferences in India, the UAE, Ukraine, Poland, Germany, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, and Curaçao. Zach has long-term investments in Tesla [TSLA], NIO [NIO], Xpeng [XPEV], Ford [F], ChargePoint [CHPT], Amazon [AMZN], Piedmont Lithium [PLL], Lithium Americas [LAC], Albemarle Corporation [ALB], Nouveau Monde Graphite [NMGRF], Talon Metals [TLOFF], Arclight Clean Transition Corp [ACTC], and Starbucks [SBUX]. But he does not offer (explicitly or implicitly) investment advice of any sort.


You May Also Like

Air Quality

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced yesterday that it will evaluate whether emissions from piston-engine aircraft operating on leaded fuel contribute...


The new EPA tailpipe emissions standards are not as tough as they appear to be. Perhaps in a few years, they will be obsolete.


The EPA has issued new fuel economy standards. Almost no one will be happy with them.

Clean Transport

The Infrastructure Investment & Jobs Act, aka Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, includes $5 billion for EV charging, but — much less discussed — it also...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.