Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Climate Change

Carbon Capture Projects Could Overshoot Energy Funding Deadline

According to a letter sent to the US Department of Energy by Gregory Friedman, the Inspector General, there is some risk that $3.4 billion in American  Recovery Act (ARRA) funds may not get allocated in time to meet the September 30th deadline, which is the “use it or lose it” date. While 90% of the ARRA funds were spent on clean energy,  the remaining funds might not make it.

Most of this was to be for two Carbon Capture and Storage projects to see if coal can be used to make energy without endangering the climate on this planet for the next 100,000 years.


Several billion in funds to demonstrate and monitor CCS are of concern to the Accountability and Transparency Board (pdf). The Carbon Capture and Storage project was to partially fund construction of the first commercial scale, fully integrated, carbon capture and sequestration project in the country.

However, the Department of Fossil Energy has not yet completed its selection process for the $1 billion CCS project. Also, the industrial application of CCS is in danger of not being fully allocated in time. Nearly half the original award amount, $741 million is still unallocated.

If CCS was proven to be successful, this would be the way that coal power stations of the future would be built, and in India and China, most are yet to be built. If it turns out to be not possible to make energy from coal without carbon emissions – endangering our only feasible home in the universe – we also need to find that out, and that is what this program was designed to determine.

The causes of the delay appear to be the increase in applicants with little or no experience in preparing proposals for Federal awards due to the radical increase in energy department funding, bureaucratic resistance in states inexperienced with novel technologies, and a shortage of time in the department to help smooth a path to implementation.

In particular CCS is novel and potentially environmentally hazardous technology, and when both innovation and environmental issues meet bureaucracy, it is bound to be overwhelming to state-level officials.

The other energy department-funded projects in danger of overshooting their deadline include three through the EERE: $177 million for weatherization, $111 million in block grants for conservation and $68 million for energy efficient buildings. ARPA-E, the advanced technologies program has $155 million unspent, 40% of its allocation.

The Department of Environmental Management still has barely begun on an $84 million project for remediation and cleanup (pdf) of former weapons complex and nuclear research facilities. Another two nuclear cleanup projects at $99 million and $77 million are more advanced but funding might not be completed in time.

As 90 days is frequently required to get project approval through at the state level and funding delivered, at this point, these currently unallocated funds might well wind up missing the September 30 deadline.

Image: Wikimedia Commons

Susan Kraemer@Twitter

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Former Tesla Battery Expert Leading Lyten Into New Lithium-Sulfur Battery Era — Podcast:

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like


Nuclear for commercial ships is so obviously flawed from a business perspective that I didn't even bother to include it in my quadrant chart...


The future of all ground transportation and an awful lot of aviation and marine shipping being electric, low-carbon, quieter, and a lot less smelly...


We have enough waste biomass feedstock to fulfill all of our transportation needs, and the market and a bunch of bright people will figure...

Clean Power

The massive new SunZia wind energy transmission line is closing in on the finish line, ESG or not.

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.