Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Climate Change

Foreign Wars Turn Red-State Vets Green

Republicans in the armed forces are coming back with much greener views on energy than the Senators that represent the Red States they come from, or the media that serves Republicans. A VoteVets poll of returning Afghanistan and Iraq veterans, comprising mostly Republicans – only 20% were Democrats – mostly from the Red States in the South showed a strikingly stark chasm opening between vets and their Senators.


Asked “Do you favor or oppose a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill that invests in clean, renewable energy sources in America and limits carbon pollution in the atmosphere?”

73% of vets voted “Aye”.

But since at least 1993, Senate Republicans have consistently voted and filibustered against all attempts at passing comprehensive clean  energy and climate legislation that limits carbon pollution in the atmosphere.

The vets see the benefit for them personally in a clean energy economy. A full 67% agree with the statement that “millions of new American jobs will be created in clean energy industries”, and even see a personal impact in that these “will help veterans find jobs when they leave the service”.

These were the cream of the crop, relatively well educated, seasoned vets, mostly in their 40’s, with 87% qualifying for either the Iraq Campaign Medal, the Afghanistan Campaign Medal, or the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal. Most were white and Christian, but not evangelicals.

What is interesting about this poll is that while on location, vets are blessed with wall to wall Fox News and Right Wing talk radio, which is paid off the books to  propagandize against clean energy, climate change, carbon pollution, and green jobs. But apparently, unlike the Tea Partiers back home, these Republicans are choosing to believe their lying eyes, not Hannity, Rush and Beck.

The only area in which Republican vets agree with their  Senator is the 64% who agree that America’s dependence on foreign oil endangers the lives of our troops.

In this belief alone, they are accurately represented by their Senate Republicans, who claim that  investing in American oil (despite US holdings of only 2% to 4% of global supplies) could somehow impact American needs, even though America is ripping through 25% of total global oil supplies every day. That is the only poll question that showed that their representatives are even remotely in alignment with their constituents views.

On the climate legislation being once more attempted this year, they sharply diverge. The fossil industry has for the last decade backed Republicans to prevent and slow legislation that hurts the fossil industry. But their constituents are not on board.

“Now let me read you some things that some people believe will happen if comprehensive clean energy and climate reform is passed. For each one, please tell me if you agree or disagree that that result will happen”.

Millions of new American jobs will be created in clean energy industries: 67% agree.

The funding and support for terrorism by oil producers will be reduced: 56% agree

In contrast with this, Collins and Snowe of Maine are the only Republicans in the current Senate who have ever voted with virtually all the Democrats for climate and energy legislation that would reduce our dependence on oil – of which, 96% to 98% is in “hostile foreign nations” rather than the USA.

The only other Republican Senators who have supported climate and clean energy legislation in the last 5 years either crossed the aisle (Specter) or were voted out in 2008; Coleman of Minnesota, and Smith of Oregon.

One; Senator McCain, has talked it up in the past, yet in practice, always stuck with the filibusters against it; voting a full 50 times against it since the still-reviled Al Gore carbon tax attempt in 1993.

Now it is Senator Graham who is issuing press conferences that suggest a planned change of heart to switch future votes. With 21% of these vets from the South, he might be a visionary, seeing a future Republican party that doesn’t hate a clean energy future for 21st century America.

Whether that change in his votes comes about or not, remains to be seen. But Republican vets clearly need to get in touch with their Senators. And their media.


More Cleantechnica from Susan Kraemer: Journalists on Twitter

Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality and cleantech news coverage? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.

Don't want to miss a cleantech story? Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Climate Change

An open-source platform model will allow access to any coral researchers; will be transdisciplinary, equitable and inclusive; and will strive for efficiency. Every penny...


Moving into the sexy but impractical quadrant, the top row shows a clear trend, and indeed the trend extends across most of the versions...

Clean Power

Wave energy developers are beginning to flex their muscles, and the Finnish company Wello aims to lead the pack with a new twist on...


The tiny island nation of Barbados could wield a big green hydrogen stick while demonstrating that energy and food security can coexist.

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.