Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Microsoft Not Liking Chamber of Commerce over Climate Change

Microsoft issues statement distancing itself from the US Chamber of Commerce on climate issuesAn epic battle has been brewing over climate change in the world of commerce, and things just got a lot more epic-er.  Global giant Microsoft has become the latest corporate leader to challenge the U.S. Chamber of Commerce over its position on climate change.  Talking Points Memo reports that Microsoft has posted a statement on its sustainability blog, making it clear that the Chamber does not speak for it on climate issues.  Memo to Chamber of Commerce, what part of “Microsoft has stated that climate change is a serious issue that demands immediate, worldwide attention and we are acting accordingly” do you not get?


The fossil fuel industry will never die, but fossil fuels are on the road to marginalization, and jobs in that sector will not drive the economy.  Instead of trying to prop up a fading industry, the Chamber should stop fiddling around and start supporting companies like Peerless Industries, Inc.  The sustainability-minded company has just announced that it has shifted 100% of its jobs back from overseas, and moved them all into a new energy efficient LEED certified building in Illinois.

Who Does the Chamber of Commerce Really Represent?

Short answer: not all of the same companies they used to.  Last month, just one day before Nike along with Starbucks and a bunch of other companies launched the Race for American Jobs (a national campaign in support of new climate legislation) the Chamber of Commerce upstaged them by filing a petition blocking the EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.  How’s that for support ?  No wonder Nike has withdrawn from its position on the Chamber’s board.  Apple, Exelon (the nation’s largest utility), Pacific Gas & Electric, and several other leading companies quit outright last fall.

Who is the Chamber Helping?

Think Progress reports that an organization called the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) is behind a state-based drive against greehouse gas regulation that backs up the Chamber’s position.  The organization (which is partly funded by Exxon, according to promotes a resolution opposing EPA’s endangerment finding on greenhouse gasses (an endangerment finding is needed in order to establish the EPA’s authority to regulate emissions).  So far at least 15 state legislatures have embarked on parallel resolutions challenging the EPA’s authority.  Many contain inflammatory language that basically positions climate science as a vast global conspiracy, and according to Think Progress all include language claiming that greenhouse gas regulation will hurt the economy.  What was that about Exxon again?

The Arizona Clean Energy Canary

If Arizona is any indication of where this is headed, fasten your seatbelts.  The global clean energy giant Suntech, which is bringing green jobs to Arizona, was among the companies and organizations that successfully lobbied the Arizona state legislature to drop a bill that would have stifled incentives for clean energy. The bill’s own primary sponsor was among those dropping it like a hot potato after hearing public testimony.  On the other side of the coin is the Arizona legislature’s ALEC/Exxon style resolution, which according to Think Progress states that the U.S. Congress doesn’t have the authority to regulate greenhouse gas pollution.  For a clue where this is going, follow the money – and I don’t mean corporate money.  Fewer jobs in the fossil fuel industry, more jobs in the clean energy sector, and that many less voters in support of anti-climate shenanigans.

Image: Microsoft Way by TechFlash Todd on

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Tina specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

In a previous article, I discussed two corporate solar energy deals that we’ve covered previously, but to make a real trend, you need at...


Globally, data centers are estimated to account for 1 to 2% of electricity usage. The percentage is higher in Europe, where data centers there...

Autonomous Vehicles

It makes sense to perform the most hazardous activities in simulations when you’re testing advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS), autonomous vehicle prototypes, or simply...


Tesla’s Autopilot team recently visited New Orleans for the Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Ashok Elluswamy, Tesla’s Director of Autopilot Software,...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.