Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Clean Power

Reuters: Cap and Trade Worked in EU

It’s official. The EU trading system got carbon emissions down. It’s one thing when renewable energy writers on blogs like this say cap and trade has transformed Europe.


We regularly cover the huge wind and solar industries created there – the results of Europe’s early adoption of the Kyoto Accord and subsequent EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) and Europe’s resulting 13% greenhouse gas reduction.  We have covered the indirect results before (like how the US now gets hand-me-down clean energy technology from Europe).

But now it’s official. Cap and trade in Europe is a success. Reuters said it.

A study has found that although there were many problems in the first phase, they were overcome and did not hamper the scheme’s ultimate objective of reducing emissions. Cap and trade was not a failure, despite the problems.

Experts at French state bank Caisse des Depots, the Paris-Dauphine University, the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research in the United States and University College Dublin collaborated to evaluate the scheme’s trial period from 2005 to 2007.

The EU’s flagship carbon trading scheme requires companies to buy permits for every tonne of carbon they emit. Then carbon output is capped and the permitted level is lowered year by year. The fines and auction fees from the dirty energy fund the creation of clean energy as in a “feebate” system.

Problems with the first ever trading have included too low a price for carbon, fluctuating prices, recent thefts of allowances (that have possibly been retired from the market: slowing carbon emissions – but not through the legal channels), tax cheats, and so on.

Other problems turned out not to be problems: for example, giving away allowances (only 1% were auctioned initially) did not slow carbon reductions. Lack of enthusiasm (some nations like those recently emerging from the former USSR were notably uncommitted) did not slow carbon reductions.

When legislation first limited CO2 from fossil energy companies in the EU only 15% of the companies covered by the European Trading System took the future cost of carbon into account. A year later 65% were making their investment decisions based on having a carbon price. Cap and trade has not failed.

Of the many successes, some that we’ve covered here previously are:

EU Paper Industry Cut Carbon pollution by 42%

Europe Unites to Invest $40 Billion in Renewable Supergrid

Foreign Windpower Taps “Saudi Arabia of Wind” Because We Can’t

Germany Runs Out of Solar Panels Due to Generous Feed-in Tariff

Half a Trillion to Build Desertec Solar From the Sahara to Europe

Image: Modek

Source REUTERS News

More Cleantechnica from Susan Kraemer:  Journalists on Twitter

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

Steel, like concrete, is such an integral part of our world that we rarely notice it. From wherever you are reading this, I guarantee...


Farmers don't buy spraying drones or hire drone spraying services because of the environmental benefits, of course. They don't need to justify the use...


We've already manufactured an awful lot of steel. There are hundreds of billions of tons of the stuff lying around, much of it obsolete.


Boston's pending green building code is an important element of many challenges that Wu will need to solve for Boston's Green New Deal to...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.