Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Policy & Politics

Carbon Capture & Storage Projects to be Excluded Under Copenhagen?

In a blow to the deal struck between the Obama administration and India during pre-Copenhagen visits, in which the President arranged for the transfer of innovative new clean coal technologies; Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) might be removed from the list of technologies that industrial countries can invest in to reduce worldwide emissions to meet Kyoto Accord goals.


This comes at a time when Kyoto Accord requirements have prompted serious investigations (unlike the always FutureGen” under the previous US administration) into CCS that are actually starting to produce results.

A Canadian trial for tapping into gas from un-mined coal-fields to run gas power plants, instead of mining and burning the coal is showing results in Alberta. A UK company is building a hydrogen electricity plant with CCS in California (previous story), partly funded by the Obama administration.

Both the UK and Canada were Kyoto signatory nations.

Under Kyoto, which China, India and the US did not sign; industrial countries must reduce greenhouse gas emissions by investing in more renewable energy, and by reducing fossil fuel emissions; for example with CCS, and using efficiency technologies like combined heat & power and waste-to-energy.

But a turnaround from last year; after some countries expressed their reservations at the UN climate talks in Copenhagen, carbon capture and storage is off the list of options that qualify. With 300 million allowances on the ETS CCS had access to up to 7 billion Euros ($10 billion) in funding.

The issue is the “untested and unproven” long-term safety of storage technologies. Wave power is at a similar stage of unproven development with just the first few pilot programs totaling less than 300 MW, (or around the size of just one typical solar farm or gas plant) being tried around the world, but safety is not an issue.

Part of the $100 billion promised from already industrialized nations to the developing nations would likely have gone to CCS projects aimed at reducing emissions from China and India. The advantage is that power plants in developing countries are yet to be built. This offers a clean slate opportunity that is no longer available in the US, where old dirty coal plants have long been grandfathered in; with the result that US coal plants are no more efficient than they were in 1957.

As a part of the Obama administration’s Manhattan Project level of VC funding – $36 billion for breakthrough renewable energy technologies; the US Department of Energy invested $1.4 billion in 12 CCS projects. Another three projects are due to receive $979 million this month.

The win-win payoff for US investment would come from technology sales resulting in greenhouse gas emission reductions from China and India.

But any final decision will be delayed till the UNFCCC’s scientific advisory body reports back to delegates at the next climate conference in Mexico in 2010 or in South Africa (a major coal dependent nation) in 2011, after it investigates the risk of seepage from storage sites and liability issues in the event of leakage.

Image: Flikr user Chuckumentary


I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it! We just don't like paywalls, and so we've decided to ditch ours. Unfortunately, the media business is still a tough, cut-throat business with tiny margins. It's a never-ending Olympic challenge to stay above water or even perhaps — gasp — grow. So ...
If you like what we do and want to support us, please chip in a bit monthly via PayPal or Patreon to help our team do what we do! Thank you!
Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.


You May Also Like

Clean Power

With more scrapping and more direct reduction using lower carbon technologies such as Midrex' DRI and HYBRIT every decade, and the likely creation of those...

Clean Transport

A new type of autonomous electric train is on track to electrify the US freight rail network and push diesel trucks off the highways,...

Clean Power

Already 2.4 times as expensive as very, very expensive Hinkley. First of a kind, so very likely to double or more in price. Very...


Kia and Ford are bringing new midsize electric SUVs to market --- one for China and one for Europe -- but none for the...

Copyright © 2023 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.