#1 cleantech news, reviews, & analysis site in world. Support our work today. The future is now.


Clean Power no image

Published on September 2nd, 2009 | by Susan Kraemer

26

Pump Hydro Underground to Store Wind Power

September 2nd, 2009 by  


Pumped hydro storage is a simple technology already in wide use. Pump water up a hill when you have available energy, let it fall when you need its power.

But Riverbank Power; a new start-up founded by a former wind developer who wants to develop large-scale energy storage, is trying out a new idea. Instead of using hills for the height, it will go the other way. Down into the ground.

Their Aquabank would let gravity drop water underground to turn turbines and make hydro electricity. That electricity would be sent from underground to the grid day time. At night, when excess wind is available; wind powered electricity would gently push the water back up to replenish its surface source.

Video after the jump:


Each project would use a source of water at ground level, an excavated cavern approximately 2,000 feet below ground and four 250-MW generators in a below-ground powerhouse.

The surface footprint would be only 5 to 10 acres, mainly for the water diversion structure and transmission infrastructure. The underground footprint would be about 100 acres.

It would use about 1 billion gallons of water for six hours of electricity production. It would take eight hours to pump out the cavern. The remaining sixteen hours each day the water supply would not be diverted.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/v/FZQTrpJ6D1I&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0]

Riverbank already has three sites permitted with FERC under review and fifteen in the works.

This is pretty amazing in itself, for such a new company, and such a novel idea, because FERC is notoriously slow and cumbersome to deal with.

Of the three permits, the first is canceled (in Ogdensburg) because of subsequent irresolvable land permitting issues. The second one in Sparta, New Jersey was for a 1000 megawatt “closed loop” system under a quarry.

Last month they found that the rock was not hard enough to support drilling, to the acute disappointment of locals eager for the jobs (and $5 million annual revenue it would bring in) and the to the relief of a neighboring community with environmental trepidation about the novel procedure.

In thanking mayors of both towns, Riverbank’s CEO Douglas said, “These leaders kept an open mind about the project, understood that scientific testing would guide the development process, and believed us when we said we wouldn’t develop a project that posed a risk to the environment.”

FERC normally grants a preliminary permit to conduct the various studies needed over three years. These cost up to $2 million, and include thorough investigation of the geologic, ecological, engineering, power transmission, economic and environmental impact.

So far, the initial studies for the third FERC permitted site are looking good and will be complete by 2011. It is for a 1,000 MW “river diversion” type of project on the Back River site in Wiscasset, Maine: 
 
Follow CleanTechnica on Google News.
It will make you happy & help you live in peace for the rest of your life.

Home Efficiency




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

writes at CleanTechnica, CSP-Today and Renewable Energy World.  She has also been published at Wind Energy Update, Solar Plaza, Earthtechling PV-Insider , and GreenProphet, Ecoseed, NRDC OnEarth, MatterNetwork, Celsius, EnergyNow, and Scientific American. As a former serial entrepreneur in product design, Susan brings an innovator's perspective on inventing a carbon-constrained civilization: If necessity is the mother of invention, solving climate change is the mother of all necessities! As a lover of history and sci-fi, she enjoys chronicling the strange future we are creating in these interesting times.    Follow Susan on Twitter @dotcommodity.



Back to Top ↑