Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?



DOE Battery Funding Overlooks New Electric Vehicle Players

Some automotive entrepreneurs are feeling like when it comes to getting DOE funding, it’s who, not what you know.
The $2.4 billion in federal funding for advanced battery and vehicle electrification announced this week boosted battery manufacturers that had prior relationships with the DOE, while some lesser-known innovators were left with hat in hand.
Matt Mattila, a consultant in the Rocky Mountain Institute’s Mobility and Vehicle Efficiency Practice says the money “went to the old guard” and left out new EV companies such as Aptera where “$100 million could make or break them.”
Also missing out on funding were battery companies including Valence, Boston Power and Bright Automotive, a company spun out of RMI. The DOE’s funding philosophy was conservative, opting to forego many newer companies while providing funds to perennial research partners Ford, GM and Chrysler.

“There’s huge open space for new guys to make a move, and the funding could have done a lot to accelerate them,” Mattila said.

Felix Kramer of plug-in hybrid advocacy group says the Obama administration’s pledge of transparency and accountability in the allocating recovery program funds has not been completely fulfilled. Cramer wrote today that results so far have been mixed as

“the bulk of the awards went to large established companies — especially automakers and component suppliers.”

The DOE also provided funding not aimed at commercialization or reducing carbon emissions on a grand scale, but instead will share the cost of pilot projects to get a smaller number of plug-in and electric vehicles onto the roads that will result in temporary jobs.
General Motors received $30 million to put 125 Chevrolet Volts on the road; Ford got $30 million to deliver and test 150 plug-in Ford Escape Hybrids; Chrysler received $70 million to deploy 220 plug-in vans and trucks.
While $160 million may seem a lot to test less than 500 vehicles (by comparison, 1,000 professional green jobs could have been paid for), the trials are considered crucial to understanding the performance of the vehicles and the batteries so prior to commercialization, and to share the automaker’s steep development cost.
ECOtality, one of the oldest electric vehicle charging equipment manufacturers (10 years) will install 12,750 charging systems through its eTec subsidiary. The $100 million grant will create small vehicle networks in Portland and three other Oregon cities, three cities in Tennessee, and in Seattle, San Diego, Phoenix and Tucson.
This article originally appeared on Matter Network.


Appreciate CleanTechnica’s originality? Consider becoming a CleanTechnica Member, Supporter, Technician, or Ambassador — or a patron on Patreon.
Have a tip for CleanTechnica, want to advertise, or want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Written By

Derek lives in southwestern New Mexico and digs bicycles, simple living, fungi, organic gardening, sustainable lifestyle design, bouldering, and permaculture. He loves fresh roasted chiles, peanut butter on everything, and buckets of coffee. Catch up with Derek on Twitter, Google+, or at his natural parenting site, Natural Papa!


You May Also Like


It’s a simple premise: To truly improve the health, safety, and security of human beings, you must first understand where those individuals are. Everything else...


New Database Provides Free, Public Access to Federal Policies, Incentives, Executive Orders, and Regulations Related to Batteries for EVs and Stationary Energy Storage By...

Clean Power

Anticipating key features of wind plants a decade or more ahead of their installation can inform today’s investment, research, and energy system planning decisions....


Room-temperature superconductors could transform everything from electrical grids to particle accelerators to computers — but before they can be realized, researchers need to better...

Copyright © 2021 CleanTechnica. The content produced by this site is for entertainment purposes only. Opinions and comments published on this site may not be sanctioned by and do not necessarily represent the views of CleanTechnica, its owners, sponsors, affiliates, or subsidiaries.