Quid Pro Quo In Environmental Politics
Support CleanTechnica's work through a Substack subscription, on Patreon, or on Stripe. Help us produce all of the high-quality, original content we publish week after week despite the challenges of content-scraping AI, antisocial media, inflation, and other hurdles.
Originally published on the ECOreport.
Anyone trying to understand the “why?” of some (seemingly stupid) political actions should read David Mason’s recent column in the Globe and Mail. His explanation of the Canadian Government’s approval of the $36 billion (CAN) Pacific NorthWest LNG project, on Lelu Island in British Columbia, boils down to quid pro quo in environmental politics.
Quid Pro Quo In Environmental Politics
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wants the province’s backing for a national carbon strategy. In return for her support, Trudeau is willing to endorse Premier Christy Clark’s plans for an LNG project that appears to be condemned by every scientist “not funded by the proponent.”
The Clark government’s desperate pursuit of this project is rooted in political necessity. It has made very little progress bringing its dream of a “trillion dollar” LNG opportunity to fruition. Now, with an election year looming, it can at least point to one project that has been approved.
If the Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal is actually built on Lelu Island, it could service up to a tanker a day. This amounts to 19.2 million metric tons a year of LNG and would also increase British Columbia’s GHG emissions 14%.
What This Means For Alberta
As David Mason points out, Trudeau’s approval of this project also sends a positive signal to the Premier of Alberta.
“Rachel Notley understands how the game is played. She knows it would be untenable for Mr. Trudeau’s government to give British Columbia an energy project it desperately craves and then turn around and stiff Alberta. It won’t happen.
“Mr. Trudeau will now approve a pipeline project (almost certainly Kinder Morgan’s) for two very important reasons: to show up the federal Conservatives by achieving something they weren’t able to do in 10 years in power; and to help Ms. Notley in her fight against right-wing forces in her province.”
Kinder Morgan Canada has agreed to an offset plan to counter the estimated 1.1 million tons of GHG emissions its pipeline project will create. It will plant trees, or something. (It does not appear to have any tenable plan to combat a major oil spill off the coast of British Columbia.)
The Fight Against Climate Change
Mason explains, “If nothing else, this week demonstrated that Mr. Trudeau has reached the point in the life of his administration where the scars of power are formed. It’s easy to sound sunny and optimistic on the campaign trail, to talk about reaching kumbaya-like consensus before decisions are made. But now he has to render judgments on projects that many people oppose – judgments that incite accusations of betrayal.”
Trudeau may emerge from all these dealings with provincial backing for a national carbon strategy. But will he make any progress in the fight against climate change?
Top photo credit: One Sunny Saturday in Ottawa by Alex Indigo via Flickr (CC BY SA, 2.0 License); Map adapted from Wilderness Committee map by Roy L Hales; Alberta Premier Rachel Notley by Day Donaldson (CC BY SA, 2.0 License)
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy
