CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Cars ford, daimler and nissan-renault partner on fuel cell vehicles

Published on January 28th, 2013 | by Tina Casey

3

Ford, Daimler, & Nissan Promise Affordable Electric Fuel Cell Vehicles

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

January 28th, 2013 by  

Now, here’s a first. Daimler AG, Ford Motor Company and Nissan Motor Co. are pushing ahead with an unusual three-way agreement to develop affordable fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs)for the mass market on three continents. Actually, it’s even more expansive than that since Renault is also included under the Nissan-Renault Alliance. The unique collaborative effort is not only designed to take advantage of the economies of scale involved in a common fuel cell system, it’s also meant to send a “clear signal to suppliers, policymakers and the industry” to jump on the fuel cell band wagon.

ford, daimler and nissan-renault partner on fuel cell vehiclesA Three-Way for Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles

The basic financial reasoning behind the new partnership is that the up-front investment costs of developing the new technology can now be split three ways instead of burdening one company with all the risk.

The project will involve developing a fuel cell stack and related systems that is identical across all three companies, but that will enable each to continue developing “highly differentiated” FCEVs under their own brands.

Each company plans to invest an equal amount, with ambitious plans to launch the first ever affordable, mass market FCEV by 2017.

FCEV’s are Ready for Their Close-Up

On its blog, Daimler points out that the three companies together have accumulated a total of more than 60 years and 10 million kilometers in FCEV research and test drives.

The foundational technology is well established. Rather than storing energy like a battery or burning fuel like a conventional engine, a fuel cell creates electricity through an electro-chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen. The only emission is water vapor.

On its own, a typical fuel cell can’t create enough electricity to power a vehicle, so multiple units have to be assembled into a fuel cell stack.

Arriving at a common configuration for the stack is only one aspect of the challenge faced by the new alliance, and it’s probably the easiest one. The other part of the problem will be to rev up enough investor interest to develop processes for manufacturing mass-marketable, low cost hydrogen and establishing a common, international infrastructure for delivering it.

The End of Battery Electric Vehicles?

Probably not. A 2009 study commissioned by the Department of Energy notes that fuel cells give you greater range for less weight, but there are other vehicle engineering issues involved that might not make fuel cells the best choice for every type of electric vehicle.

Though spokes persons for the three companies are understandably excited about the new alliance, they have also been quick to note that fuel cell technology will complement their battery EV offerings, not replace them.

Meeting the Hydrogen Challenge

Aside from infrastructure issues, the overall greenhouse gas emissions issue for FCEVs has to be overcome, just as it does for EVs. In the U.S., with our heavy reliance on fossil fuels for electricity generation, charging up your EV generally means that your ultimate source of fuel is coal, natural gas or oil. That’s changing, though, as more wind power and solar energy are rapidly coming on line, both for individual charging stations and on the grid.

FCEVs face a similar challenge, and a similar solution. It takes an enormous amount of energy to manufacture hydrogen, so introducing a huge number of FCEVs to the U.S. market right now would have a consequent effect on fossil fuel consumption.


However, the fossil fuel issue is quickly fading away for FCEVs. Over at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, for example, researchers are using a natural protein to develop a new catalyst for low cost, highly efficient hydrogen manufacturing. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab is tackling the same problem from a different angle, using a low cost catalyst based on titanium dioxide.

Then there’s a company called HyperSolar, which has come up with a solar powered hydrogen generator, and a University of Colorado-Denver research project for a microbe-driven process that can treat and desalinate wastewater while creating hydrogen and generating electricity, too.

Image: FCEV by pgegreenenergy

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • geraldshields

    Utter nonsense and a waste of money. Electric cars and hybrids are the way to go.

  • Bob_Wallace

    Assuming fuel cell vehicles could be marketed for the same price of EVs, FCEVs would still face two significant hurdles.

    1) There is an energy loss when using electricity to crack water during the production of hydrogen. About a 40% loss. That makes the cost of fuel for a FCEV at least 40% higher than the electricity for an EV.

    2) There is no infrastructure for producing, storing and distributing hydrogen for vehicle fuel. It would cost billions and billions of dollars to replace our refineries, tanker trucks and gas stations with a hydrogen system. That investment would have to be paid for as part of the final price of hydrogen at the pump.

    The infrastructure for EVs is at least 90% in place right now. We have plenty of generation capacity. The distribution system is up and running. 60% of all drivers have a place to plug in at night. We simply need to install an outlet for the other 40%.

    If EVs achieve adequate range (~200 miles) and drop in price a bit more they will likely establish a market position that would make them very difficult to replace.

    Why would people switch to FCEVs and pay more per mile to drive?

    The only reason that FCEVs might replace EVs if they could be sold for significantly less money. A buyer would have to save enough on purchase price to offset the higher fuel cost. And unless they can be produced in very large volume there is no way for market efficiencies to bring the price down.

  • http://www.facebook.com/stan.stein.31 Stan Stein

    This “costs too much” crap about fuel cells is beyond absurd……the government gives tax credits on electrics….why in the world can’t that same money be used to subsidize the ownership of individual family hydrogen generators? For a home with solar…it would operate at no actual cost…..and the home wold also save on power…plus….the money for an E car’s battery could go towards the home generator as well….that’s a total of about $10 to $12K……are you telling me that a home size H generator would cost more than $12K….that’s total crap. Cars would weigh less, be less expensive to build…..not be limited to what? 300 charges per battery…..and here’s a biggie…..no toxic waste as with used batteries….as usual, with almost anything in the sustainable genre…this is a “leet’s poke it with a steeek, Homer” issue.

Back to Top ↑