Ford, Daimler, & Nissan Promise Affordable Electric Fuel Cell Vehicles

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Now, here’s a first. Daimler AG, Ford Motor Company and Nissan Motor Co. are pushing ahead with an unusual three-way agreement to develop affordable fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs)for the mass market on three continents. Actually, it’s even more expansive than that since Renault is also included under the Nissan-Renault Alliance. The unique collaborative effort is not only designed to take advantage of the economies of scale involved in a common fuel cell system, it’s also meant to send a “clear signal to suppliers, policymakers and the industry” to jump on the fuel cell band wagon.

ford, daimler and nissan-renault partner on fuel cell vehiclesA Three-Way for Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles

The basic financial reasoning behind the new partnership is that the up-front investment costs of developing the new technology can now be split three ways instead of burdening one company with all the risk.

The project will involve developing a fuel cell stack and related systems that is identical across all three companies, but that will enable each to continue developing “highly differentiated” FCEVs under their own brands.

Each company plans to invest an equal amount, with ambitious plans to launch the first ever affordable, mass market FCEV by 2017.

FCEV’s are Ready for Their Close-Up

On its blog, Daimler points out that the three companies together have accumulated a total of more than 60 years and 10 million kilometers in FCEV research and test drives.

The foundational technology is well established. Rather than storing energy like a battery or burning fuel like a conventional engine, a fuel cell creates electricity through an electro-chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen. The only emission is water vapor.

On its own, a typical fuel cell can’t create enough electricity to power a vehicle, so multiple units have to be assembled into a fuel cell stack.

Arriving at a common configuration for the stack is only one aspect of the challenge faced by the new alliance, and it’s probably the easiest one. The other part of the problem will be to rev up enough investor interest to develop processes for manufacturing mass-marketable, low cost hydrogen and establishing a common, international infrastructure for delivering it.

The End of Battery Electric Vehicles?

Probably not. A 2009 study commissioned by the Department of Energy notes that fuel cells give you greater range for less weight, but there are other vehicle engineering issues involved that might not make fuel cells the best choice for every type of electric vehicle.

Though spokes persons for the three companies are understandably excited about the new alliance, they have also been quick to note that fuel cell technology will complement their battery EV offerings, not replace them.

Meeting the Hydrogen Challenge

Aside from infrastructure issues, the overall greenhouse gas emissions issue for FCEVs has to be overcome, just as it does for EVs. In the U.S., with our heavy reliance on fossil fuels for electricity generation, charging up your EV generally means that your ultimate source of fuel is coal, natural gas or oil. That’s changing, though, as more wind power and solar energy are rapidly coming on line, both for individual charging stations and on the grid.

FCEVs face a similar challenge, and a similar solution. It takes an enormous amount of energy to manufacture hydrogen, so introducing a huge number of FCEVs to the U.S. market right now would have a consequent effect on fossil fuel consumption.

However, the fossil fuel issue is quickly fading away for FCEVs. Over at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, for example, researchers are using a natural protein to develop a new catalyst for low cost, highly efficient hydrogen manufacturing. Lawrence Berkeley National Lab is tackling the same problem from a different angle, using a low cost catalyst based on titanium dioxide.

Then there’s a company called HyperSolar, which has come up with a solar powered hydrogen generator, and a University of Colorado-Denver research project for a microbe-driven process that can treat and desalinate wastewater while creating hydrogen and generating electricity, too.

Image: FCEV by pgegreenenergy

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey

Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

CleanTechnica Holiday Wish Book

Holiday Wish Book Cover

Click to download.

Our Latest EVObsession Video

I don't like paywalls. You don't like paywalls. Who likes paywalls? Here at CleanTechnica, we implemented a limited paywall for a while, but it always felt wrong — and it was always tough to decide what we should put behind there. In theory, your most exclusive and best content goes behind a paywall. But then fewer people read it!! So, we've decided to completely nix paywalls here at CleanTechnica. But...
Like other media companies, we need reader support! If you support us, please chip in a bit monthly to help our team write, edit, and publish 15 cleantech stories a day!
Thank you!

CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Tina Casey

Tina specializes in advanced energy technology, military sustainability, emerging materials, biofuels, ESG and related policy and political matters. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on LinkedIn, Threads, or Bluesky.

Tina Casey has 3148 posts and counting. See all posts by Tina Casey

3 thoughts on “Ford, Daimler, & Nissan Promise Affordable Electric Fuel Cell Vehicles

  • This “costs too much” crap about fuel cells is beyond absurd……the government gives tax credits on electrics….why in the world can’t that same money be used to subsidize the ownership of individual family hydrogen generators? For a home with solar…it would operate at no actual cost…..and the home wold also save on power…plus….the money for an E car’s battery could go towards the home generator as well….that’s a total of about $10 to $12K……are you telling me that a home size H generator would cost more than $12K….that’s total crap. Cars would weigh less, be less expensive to build…..not be limited to what? 300 charges per battery…..and here’s a biggie… toxic waste as with used batteries….as usual, with almost anything in the sustainable genre…this is a “leet’s poke it with a steeek, Homer” issue.

  • Assuming fuel cell vehicles could be marketed for the same price of EVs, FCEVs would still face two significant hurdles.

    1) There is an energy loss when using electricity to crack water during the production of hydrogen. About a 40% loss. That makes the cost of fuel for a FCEV at least 40% higher than the electricity for an EV.

    2) There is no infrastructure for producing, storing and distributing hydrogen for vehicle fuel. It would cost billions and billions of dollars to replace our refineries, tanker trucks and gas stations with a hydrogen system. That investment would have to be paid for as part of the final price of hydrogen at the pump.

    The infrastructure for EVs is at least 90% in place right now. We have plenty of generation capacity. The distribution system is up and running. 60% of all drivers have a place to plug in at night. We simply need to install an outlet for the other 40%.

    If EVs achieve adequate range (~200 miles) and drop in price a bit more they will likely establish a market position that would make them very difficult to replace.

    Why would people switch to FCEVs and pay more per mile to drive?

    The only reason that FCEVs might replace EVs if they could be sold for significantly less money. A buyer would have to save enough on purchase price to offset the higher fuel cost. And unless they can be produced in very large volume there is no way for market efficiencies to bring the price down.

  • Utter nonsense and a waste of money. Electric cars and hybrids are the way to go.

Comments are closed.