CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world.


Fossil Fuels promised land movies explores fracking pollution

Published on October 3rd, 2012 | by Tina Casey

4

Matt Damon Takes Fracking from Gasland to the Promised Land

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

October 3rd, 2012 by
 
 
Aside from the fact that only one of them gets to have Matt Damon in the credits, there are a couple of key similarities between Gus Van Sant’s new feature film Promised Land and Josh Fox’s budget documentary Gasland. Both are set in Pennsylvania, and both make a connection between fracking and pollution that has eluded investigators for decades. Public awareness about the risks of fracking has also proved elusive, but with Promised Land due for wide release on December 28, that may all be about to change.

promised land movies explores fracking pollution

Fracking and Pollution

Fracking is a natural gas drilling method that involves pumping a chemical brine underground to loosen gas deposits from shale formations.

In the past, evidence of water contamination and other hazards from fracking was anecdotal at best. There were no direct chemical fingerprints for investigators to compare because drillers were exempted from federal disclosure regulations, and they were entitled to keep the ingredients of their fracking brine a secret.

That’s been changing under the Obama Administration, and hard evidence is slowly (very slowly) beginning to mount. Last year, the EPA found fracking chemicals in a Wyoming water supply, and its results were recently confirmed by the U.S. Geological Survey.

Meanwhile, Bloomberg News reports that EPA has linked fracking to water contamination in Pennsylvania, where Promised Land is set.


 

Fracking and the Marcellus Shale

The Pennsylvania connection is no accident, and that brings up another change affecting the gas drilling industry. Fracking flew under the public radar for many years partly because it was concentrated in thinly populated areas far from media centers.

More recently, drillers have been focusing on the Marcellus shale formation that runs under high-population states and major media markets including Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York.

Promised Land and Pennsylvania Fracking

Our friends over at Grist have a lively plot synopsis of Promised Land, which also stars John Krasinski of the hit TV show The Office and Frances McDormand of the movie Fargo. A complete Promised Land cast and other production details are available at imdb.com, where you can also watch the Promised Land trailer.

Back in real life, Pennsylvania has become ground zero for public activism against fracking. Many Pennsylvania natives could also tell you (disclosure: I’m one) that there really is a Promised Land in Pennsylvania, Promised Land State Park (yep, been there), though the film was shot in another part of the state in the town of Worthington.

Promised Land (the movie) makes its points about the devastating effect that fracking could have on fragile rural economies that depend on agriculture. The risk of harm to sensitive environments also leaves tourism-based economies exposed, and somewhat ironically Promised Land (the park) was the scene of a visit just last summer from Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett, who stopped off there on the second leg of a kayak trip promoting tourism in the state.

In real life, Governor Corbett is unpopular in some circles due to his support of the fracking industry. That includes weakening the home rule principle that forms a key plot point of the Promised Land movie, in which local citizens would have a say over whether or not to allow drilling in their town.

No surprise that on an earlier step of Corbett’s tourist trek, real-life fracking protesters where there to greet him as he drifted down the Delaware River.

Image: Natural gas. Some rights reserved by Derrick Coetzee.

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • Pingback: Yoko Ono, Sean Lennon Join Thousands At Anti-Fracking March At NY Governor Cuomo’s Office | PlanetSave

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=504930140 Mike Knapp

    There’s a group of local residents in the area where the movie was actually filmed that are extremely upset at the way that gas drilling is being portrayed in this movie. Western Pennsylvania is the literally the birthplace of gas and oil drilling. There’s over 10,000 gas and oil wells drilled in Armstrong county over the last 150 years. The farms here are not brown. The livestock is not sick. There is no contaminated water, at least from not from gas drilling (turn of the century coal mines have hurt many local waterways). Gas drilling has always been a welcome and highly supported activity here. We’ve witnessed it up close and personal for generations, and we’re not the least bit scared of it.

    Check it out: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Armstrong-County-Promised-Land-Pride/207840226013585

  • http://www.facebook.com/edward.kerr.33 Edward Kerr

    Until we get serious about developing the alternatives that exist fracking won’t be stopped by all the protesting in the world. We need energy and unless one offers solutions to that dilemma it will be business as usual and the safety of your drinking water be damned. I live in Pa over the Marcellus Shale deposit and I’m concerned about my drinking water. There is a rig nearby that could easily impact my drinking water. The idea that my (and my loved ones) health MUST take a back seat to corporate profits and our need for energy really ticks me off when I KNOW that SAFE and CLEAN alternatives exist and are being ignored because they will require investment. By the time the corporations “get it” there won’t be enough to invest to save our sorry butts or their precious income. (he said with venom dripping from his lips)
    Edward Kerr

    • Bob_Wallace

      It’s going to take cheap storage to displace natural gas. We can cut the use of gas with more wind and solar but due to their variable nature gas will still be in demand as fill-in power.

      If one of the companies such as Ambri or Aquion can bring their storage batteries to market and give us storage for < $0.02/kWh (their projections) then we can store wind-electricity for a price competitive with gas generation. And without the CO2/fracking problems.

Back to Top ↑