CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world.


Fossil Fuels new gas fracking studies show risks

Published on August 9th, 2012 | by Tina Casey

9

Another Bad Week for Fracking

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

August 9th, 2012 by
 
 
It’s been another bad week for fracking. On top of previous studies, a new report has linked this controversial natural gas drilling method to earthquakes in Texas, and another new study has exposed water pollution risks in New York. Nevertheless, a group of federal legislators chose this week to release a letter lobbying for more natural gas exports, which puts them in the unenviable position of advocating for increased risks to U.S. communities.

new gas fracking studies show risks

Earthquakes and Fracking

Fracking is a method for retrieving natural gas from shale formations by pumping a chemical brine underground. Among other issues, disposal of the brine is problematic. The U.S. EPA has estimated that about 2 billion gallons of brine daily are disposed of in 144,000 injection wells around the country.

The new study from the University of Texas study uncovered a strong link between seismic activity and a group of injection wells in the Barnett Shale region in the northern part of the state. The researchers found more earthquakes than a previous analysis of the Barnett Shale had identified, but all were too small to have an impact on the surface.

Though the Texas study concluded that this seismic activity did not pose a danger to the public in that region, it supports a finding reached last year by seismologists from Columbia University who studied earthquakes in Ohio and linked them to a nearby fracking brine injection well.

In that instance, the earthquakes were felt on the surface, raising concerns about impacts on buildings and infrastructure.

Water Contamination and Fracking

Undertaken by Stony Brook University, the New York study examined different pathways for contamination related to fracking operations in part of the Marcellus Shale region, which encompasses numerous high-population areas throughout New York, Pennsylvania, and other states.

The researchers concluded that “the disposal of contaminated wastewater from hydraulic fracturing – commonly known as “fracking” – wells producing natural gas in the Marcellus Shale region poses substantial potential risks of river and other water pollution.”

The study found elements of risk throughout the operation, including the potential for spillage from trucks transporting brine, failure of storage lagoons on the surface, failure of well casings, and systematic leakage or migration of fracking brine from wells.

The study also linked higher levels of contamination in rivers to discharges from wastewater treatment facilities that handle spent fracking brine.
 

 

Fracking and Risk

Under the Bush administration, fracking was granted an exemption from federal clean water regulations and disclosure rules, making it virtually impossible to quantify risks and impacts beyond local, anecdotal evidence.

Nevertheless, a body of evidence is building on environmental and public health impacts, including the release of the potent greenhouse gas methane from drilling sites as well as earthquakes and drinking water contamination. The Obama Administration has also mounted an effort to identify the contents of fracking brine and establish a more protective regulatory framework.

Fracking and Natural Gas Exports

The legislators advocating for more natural gas exports represent Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma. These states have long dominated the natural gas scene, but competition from the Marcellus region and elsewhere is eroding that position and driving them to find new markets.

If fracking was a benign or impact-neutral operation, there wouldn’t be much of an issue around stepping up exports of natural gas.

However, given the evidence at hand, expanding the export market for natural gas will help accelerate the pace of fracking operations and result in increased risk for more U.S. communities.

Aside from short-term or episodic impacts, the long-term consequences could be significant in terms of endemic regional public health issues and economic malaise.

A recent study of coal mining operations in Appalachia provides a glimpse into the future of communities dominated by fossil fuel extraction, and it doesn’t paint a pretty picture.

Image: Attribution Some rights reserved by williac.

Follow me on Twitter: @TinaMCasey.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • Pingback: San Diego Loves Green – Biggest Ever Earthquake In Oklahoma Is Linked To Oil Wastewater Injection

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Chip-Cogswelle/100002385056800 Chip Cogswelle

    The euphoria of the fracking boom, with promises of energy independence and
    thousands of jobs, is interfering with common sense. Polluted groundwater and aquifers
    could cause incredible economic damage, yet the people in power
    (petro-chem business) are doing their best to supress legitimate
    studies. If we don’t find the truth soon it may be too late, and we may
    pay more for drinking water than for gas! It’s time to cancel the Bush-era pollution exemptions.

    • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Yes, it’s completely insane.

  • Pingback: New Matt Damon Film Promised Land Explores Fracking Hazards

  • Pingback: USGS Finds Fracking Water Contamination in Wyoming

  • http://www.facebook.com/luthielssong Robert Fanney

    We need to call our utilities and ask them to install more wind and solar — not shift to more natural gas generation. Between climate change, the water impacts, and the earthquake risk, this fuel should not be encouraged.

  • diana

    SO IL really dont need anything that could trigger an earthquake.
    the area is too sensitive to have fracking done.

  • Kmartn1

    Origin Oil has a very cost effective system for cleaning up frack waste water,  It’s also very efficient.  Over 95% of solids were separated from the water on the first pass of a multistage process.  Almost 100% of the waste water can be reused instead of dumped.  Results were verified outside of OriginOil.  Their process is a real game-changer.  Read more at OriginOil.com

Back to Top ↑