CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world.


CO2 Emissions Florida State University is helping to develop a new superconducting magnet that saves energy and lowers cost.

Published on December 2nd, 2009 | by Tina Casey

4

New Superconducting Magnet Breaks Records with a Lower Carbon Footprint

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

December 2nd, 2009 by
 
Florida State University is helping to develop a new superconducting magnet that saves energy and lowers cost.Florida State University has just announced that it is chipping in $1 million toward the cost of a $3 million magnet to be constructed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory.  The new high tech magnet is expected to generate a field about 45% more powerful than the strongest superconducting magnet currently available, or roughly 3,000 times stronger than an ordinary refrigerator magnet.

[social_buttons]

Behind that strength is a sustainable purpose: the new magnet will be made of a high-temperature superconductor that is more energy efficient and far less expensive to operate than its conventional counterparts.  If it proves successful – and researchers at the lab have every expectation that it will be – it could mark the beginning of a new generation of super powerful magnets that help lower both the cost and the carbon footprint of scientific research.

The Trouble with Low-Temperature Superconducting Magnets

Until now, superconducting magnets have required a low temperature to operate, which in turn requires expensive coolants such as liquid helium.  There’s another catch: conventional superconductor materials stop working if the magnetic field exceeds 23 tesla (a tesla is a unit of measurement for the strength of magnetic fields).  That’s no problem for hospital MRI machines and similar equipment, which operate at no more than 3 tesla.  But it puts a severe crimp in scientific research.  To get around it, researchers can use resistive magnets made of non-superconducting materials, but these require far more electricity to operate.  To say nothing of the carbon footprint, the expense is a significant burden, well over $700 per hour for a typical resistive magnet.

The New High-Temperature Superconducting Magnet

The new magnet has been developed in collaboration with industry partner SuperPower Inc., a global specialist in superconductors.  It will use about 5 miles of cable made of a superconducting material called yttrium barium copper oxide (YBCO).  YBCO can operate in magnetic fields higher than 23 tesla, and in fact the new magnet is expected to achieve 32 tesla.  YBCO does not require a low operating temperature, and once brought up to speed it requires little or no electricity.  It also creates a more stable field than resistive magnets, making it a more dependable source for data in scientific research at the high end of the tesla scale.

Magnets and Research

Researchers expect that the new magnet will make the old resistive magnets obsolete in physics research.  In practical terms that means potential advances in medical diagnostic equipment, studies of protein structure, and the physics of semiconductors and metals.  It could also have implications for the use of magnets in new sustainable technologies from small hand-held battery powered devices on up to battery powered cars – and perhaps beyond.

Image: Magnetic toy by Karl Horton on flickr.com.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/search/personnel/getprofile.aspx?fname=Hubertus&lname=Weijers H.W. Weijers

    The statement you make that “YBCO does not need a low operating temperature”, is a bit misleading in this context. YBCO is superconducting at relatively high temperatures. But, like all superconductors, its current carrying properties and magnetic field tolerance improve as the temperature is reduced. The level of performance required for the 32 T magnet demands that the YBCO is operated at low temperatures, just like the traditional low temperature superconductors.

    There are many applications of YBCO in the 30 K, 50 K or even 80 Kelvin temperature range, but high field magnets like the 32 T discussed here is not one of those.

  • http://www.magnet.fsu.edu/search/personnel/getprofile.aspx?fname=Hubertus&lname=Weijers H.W. Weijers

    The statement you make that “YBCO does not need a low operating temperature”, is a bit misleading in this context. YBCO is superconducting at relatively high temperatures. But, like all superconductors, its current carrying properties and magnetic field tolerance improve as the temperature is reduced. The level of performance required for the 32 T magnet demands that the YBCO is operated at low temperatures, just like the traditional low temperature superconductors.

    There are many applications of YBCO in the 30 K, 50 K or even 80 Kelvin temperature range, but high field magnets like the 32 T discussed here is not one of those.

  • Henry Gibson

    The proposed super conductor does require a low temperature but not as low as the original metalic superconductors. The energy cost of keeping super conductors cold must be balanced against the losses in ordinary conductors, but in the case of research magnets, the cost for cooling is usually cheaper if the the magnetic field can be achieved. Electrical distribution with superconductors is not usually cheap enough and large cheap conductors such as sodium could be used for underground cables more economically. Modern semiconductors allow for efficient transmission of electrical energy with high voltage direct current. ..HG..

  • Henry Gibson

    The proposed super conductor does require a low temperature but not as low as the original metalic superconductors. The energy cost of keeping super conductors cold must be balanced against the losses in ordinary conductors, but in the case of research magnets, the cost for cooling is usually cheaper if the the magnetic field can be achieved. Electrical distribution with superconductors is not usually cheap enough and large cheap conductors such as sodium could be used for underground cables more economically. Modern semiconductors allow for efficient transmission of electrical energy with high voltage direct current. ..HG..

Back to Top ↑