CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power Solar Panels

Published on May 12th, 2009 | by Angiolo Laviziano

6

Beyond Subsidized Solar Power: The Path to Grid Parity

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

May 12th, 2009 by  

Solar Panels

Editor’s Note: The is a guest contribution by Angiolo Laviziano, President and CEO of REC Solar IncThis is the third post in a series from the CEO’s of major solar companies. The first post was by the SolarCity CEO, Lyndon Rive, and the second was by groSolar CEO Jeff Wolfe. You can follow the complete series here.

[social_buttons]

Two phrases that are often repeated in the solar industry are “Grid Parity” and “Cost Roadmap”. Grid parity is generally considered to be a key goal of the solar industry. Grid parity will be achieved in the U.S. when customers are motivated to buy solar because the investment has a sufficient return WITHOUT any subsidies from the federal or state government.  At present, most people consider PV to be a financially acceptable investment only if federal, state and rebate incentives are applied.

Currently, the rebates and tax credits offered by the government improve the financial return of a solar project together with other factors, such as the solar electric system cost (lower is better for the return), sun exposure on site (higher is better) and the cost of electricity that the solar system is substituting (higher is better).

The cost of electricity is of particular importance: solar substitutes for electricity demand on the customer’s side of the meter, where it competes with the retail price of electricity. This is in contrast to wind power, which is generated on the utility side of the meter, and therefore competes with the much lower wholesale rate of electricity.

The average price of a 100kW system in San Diego, California costs $6.50/Watt DC. A 100kW system generates approximately 154,000 kWh per year and has an estimated payback time of 7 years with government incentives and 13 years without incentives; whereas in Boulder, Colorado the payback time with incentives is 7 years and 18 years without incentives. The numbers vary significantly in Portland, Oregon. The payback is 4 years and 24 years, respectively. Honolulu, Hawaii shows the best return with 4 years payback with government incentives and 7 years payback without incentives.

The above data shows that Hawaii is closest to grid parity given the combination of high electricity prices and excellent solar insolation. At the moment, none of these markets are offering an acceptable payback time to solar electric system owners without the help from government incentives.

Our customer research shows that a payback time of 7 years is satisfactory to the purchaser of a 100kW system. In a non-incentive scenario the solar system price would have to be around $2.90/Watt DC in California, $1.70/Watt DC in Colorado and $5.90/Watt DC in Hawaii.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Angiolo Laviziano guides the strategic direction and long-term vision of REC Solar. He believes that solar electricity will become part of the mainstream energy supply within the next decade, and that the USA will be the world’s largest market for solar electricity within five years. “Our goal is to make solar simple and affordable, giving as many residential and business customers as possible the opportunity to install solar,” says Laviziano. “The positive environmental impact from solar power that we all desire will be realized by making solar electricity economically attractive.” In the 1990s Laviziano worked in the financial industry in Hong Kong before joining Conergy, the largest European renewable energy system integrator. He served on Conergy's board of directors and saw the company through a strong and profitable growth process culminating in its European IPO in 2005. Laviziano received a PhD in Financial Economics from the University of Hong Kong and holds a graduate business degree, equivalent to an MBA, from Koblenz School of Corporate Management in Koblenz, Germany.



  • mds

    First Solar (CdTe) and Nanosolar (CIGS) claim to have already acheived $1/Wp. Actually, they both claim to have bypassed this. They’re very busy selling to OEMs and installing their own PV power plants. (7.5 cents/kWh for First Solar’s plant with Sempra in Nevada. Half the price of power in S. California. Kaching!) We won’t see this for the retail end until supply has caught up with demand …and maybe this will have to happen more than once. There’s a long way for retail prices to fall. In the mean time, I’m sure balance-of-system (BOS, i.e. rectifiers, mounting frames, wiring, etc.) and installation costs will continue to go down as the market grows and the competition heats up.

    Basically, we already have the PV and Production technology for grid parity. We’re just waiting for production volume, BOS, and installation costs to catch up.

    PV is the cell phone of the energy market. Shoebox phone PV today. i-phone PV tomorrow.

    Most PV growth predictions will prove conservative in hindsight. Watch!

  • mds

    First Solar (CdTe) and Nanosolar (CIGS) claim to have already acheived $1/Wp. Actually, they both claim to have bypassed this. They’re very busy selling to OEMs and installing their own PV power plants. (7.5 cents/kWh for First Solar’s plant with Sempra in Nevada. Half the price of power in S. California. Kaching!) We won’t see this for the retail end until supply has caught up with demand …and maybe this will have to happen more than once. There’s a long way for retail prices to fall. In the mean time, I’m sure balance-of-system (BOS, i.e. rectifiers, mounting frames, wiring, etc.) and installation costs will continue to go down as the market grows and the competition heats up.

    Basically, we already have the PV and Production technology for grid parity. We’re just waiting for production volume, BOS, and installation costs to catch up.

    PV is the cell phone of the energy market. Shoebox phone PV today. i-phone PV tomorrow.

    Most PV growth predictions will prove conservative in hindsight. Watch!

  • Ryan

    Am I missing something here…

    100kW = 100 000W

    6.50$/W * 100 000W = 650 000$ ??? I know this isn’t correct, so what am I missing?

  • Ryan

    Am I missing something here…

    100kW = 100 000W

    6.50$/W * 100 000W = 650 000$ ??? I know this isn’t correct, so what am I missing?

  • Jagan Nemani

    Some very good points on the roadmap for price reduction and how Solar PV will acheive grid parity. Some points that were missed were around using metallurgical grade silicon. This has lower cost of production and hence can reduce the overall price of the PV system. We just have to figure out how to get good efficiencies out fo the metallurgical grade silicon.

    Does REC Solar have a position on Mettalurgical grade silicon?

  • Jagan Nemani

    Some very good points on the roadmap for price reduction and how Solar PV will acheive grid parity. Some points that were missed were around using metallurgical grade silicon. This has lower cost of production and hence can reduce the overall price of the PV system. We just have to figure out how to get good efficiencies out fo the metallurgical grade silicon.

    Does REC Solar have a position on Mettalurgical grade silicon?

Back to Top ↑