Montana Court Rules In Favor Of Young Climate Advocates
A court in Montana has ruled the state constitution means exactly what it says. Naturally, opponents will appeal, claiming they know better.
A court in Montana has ruled the state constitution means exactly what it says. Naturally, opponents will appeal, claiming they know better.
If you drive an electric car in parts of Montana, you may find out what range anxiety is all about — and wind up being a headline in the local paper.
Held Vs. Montana is a climate lawsuit brought under the terms of Article IX of the state constitution. The trial began this week.
Held vs. Montana is a succinct legal climate challenge, but such climate cases are new and uncertain.
Bozemen, Montana — A new NRDC analysis shows that the Build Back Better Act, as it currently stands, has the potential to significantly … [continued]
In our latest Short-Term Energy Outlook (STEO), we forecast that electricity generation from U.S. hydropower plants will be 14% lower in 2021 … [continued]
Originally published at ILSR.org For this episode of our Voices of 100% series of the Local Energy Rules Podcast, host John Farrell talks … [continued]
Fire weather is heating up across the western United States, exacerbated by an intense heatwave and ongoing severe drought. NOAA satellites … [continued]
Courtesy of Union Of Concerned Scientists, The Equation. By Pablo Ortiz, Bilingual Western States Climate Scientist The drought facing the Western … [continued]
This report ranks US states according to the percentage of their electricity that comes from solar.