Two Energy Paths: China Locks In Renewables, U.S. Clings To Coal
Support CleanTechnica's work through a Substack subscription or on Stripe.
Last Updated on: 21st August 2025, 03:11 am
China’s coal consumption dropped by about 2.6% in the first six months of 2025 while electricity demand rose roughly 5% compared with the same period in 2024. That means China added solar and wind capacity fast enough to cover new demand and then some. U.S. coal fired electricity jumped 14% in the same span. That came as natural gas prices rose by more than 60%, pushing utilities to use coal again because it was cheaper. Coal fired generation rose to the highest level since 2022 in many regions.
Natural gas prices surged in early 2025 largely because U.S. supply was being pulled into global markets at a record pace. Strong demand in Europe and Asia kept liquefied natural gas cargoes sailing out of American ports, linking domestic prices more tightly to international benchmarks than ever before. That exposed U.S. consumers to the same price shocks felt abroad. At the same time, Trump’s policies removed barriers to export expansion and weakened regulations that might have reserved more supply for domestic use. By prioritizing sales overseas, the administration amplified the pressure on local markets, driving up costs for power producers at home and making coal the cheaper option to keep the lights on.
China’s clean energy build out is about more than panels and wind turbines. It includes new transmission lines, storage, grid upgrades and planning that prevents waste. That kind of infrastructure shapes behaviour because once it is built, it guides investment and operation. When you string HVDC lines across vast provinces you force your economy into solar, wind and hydro. If you tie all that clean energy into storage and smart grids your room for coal shrinks.
China’s record deployments of renewables in 2025 are not just expanding capacity, they are actively displacing fossil generation and the pollution that comes with it. The 92 GW of solar installed in May alone pushed total solar capacity past 1 TW, a level no other country is close to. That scale means new electricity demand can be met without firing up additional coal plants, and in many cases existing fossil units are being run less often or shut down altogether. Every gigawatt of clean generation that feeds the grid trims coal burn, lowers sulfur dioxide and particulate emissions, and cuts CO₂ output. The result is a visible reduction in air pollution across major industrial regions and a measurable decline in national emissions, showing how infrastructure choices directly reshape both climate outcomes and public health.
In the United States the opposite is happening. Coal plants that should be retired are staying online. Companies that can run on coal or gas are choosing coal because gas is costly. That reinforces the case for keeping coal plants alive and for dogged holding on to the old system. Once you keep that plant alive you delay the cost signals that would push toward renewables. Every hour you burn coal that should not be burning you lock in that path a bit more.
Policy choices matter. China is pushing power sector transformation through central planning. It can build clean infrastructure quickly. The United States is moving backward with executive orders that extend the life of aging coal plants, lift barriers to coal mining, and give regulatory breaks to coal operators. That opens a political door to keep care for coal instead of care for investment in cleaner alternatives.
Behind the policies are economics and ideology. Solar and wind have dropped in cost for years. Batteries are cheaper. In China that means cheap renewables can compete and win. In the United States political choices tilt the scale back toward coal even if markets say otherwise. That tension between economic reality and political preference defines energy choices in 2025 more than ever before.
The cost of coal never totally disappeared. When gas prices jumped to an average of about $3.53 per million Btu compared with $2.15 last year utilities switched back. That shift left coal fired output up 14% and fossil fuel generation up 1% overall in power. Clean energy output did rise 3% thanks to 34% more solar generation. But coal’s rebound erased years of progress.
All of this has long term implications for emissions. U.S. power sector emissions rose sharply in early 2025, pushing global emissions up even while China cut them. China offset about 60 million tons of emissions, while the U.S. added million of tons in the first quarter alone. That gap tells a story of two systems.
China’s infrastructure trajectory means its emissions path will keep tilting down, even if it keeps building a little coal capacity for backup. The system it is building makes clean power a default choice. The United States is setting up infrastructure lock in for fossil fuel generation that holds power switched toward coal. That choice weighs on long term emissions because infrastructure lives longer than policy cycles.
The health and environmental consequences of coal’s trajectory in China and the United States are stark. As China cuts coal use, it reduces fine particulate pollution that drives respiratory illness, lowers sulfur dioxide emissions that cause acid rain, and trims carbon output that fuels climate change. The improvements are visible in cleaner skies and measurable drops in premature deaths linked to air pollution. In the U.S., the coal rebound reverses those gains, with more mercury, particulates, and greenhouse gases released into the air. That choice burdens public health, increases medical costs, and deepens the climate footprint, showing how infrastructure decisions echo far beyond the power sector.
At some point grids make their own logic. You build capacity and operators use it. They fix it. They send more power through it. They bond with it. The more clean grid you put in the ground the harder you pull the system into cleaner choices. The more you keep old coal plants alive the more you preserve the option to use coal when problems emerge.
Energy transitions are made of paths chosen and infrastructure built. You might say infrastructure is the architecture of emissions. Build one type and you get one kind of future. Build another and you get a different one. Today China is architecting a low carbon energy system. The United States is investing in a fossil fuel version. That choice matters not just for the next year but for the next decade. When the grid asks what fuel you have built for, you better answer with a plan for the future not the past.
Sign up for CleanTechnica's Weekly Substack for Zach and Scott's in-depth analyses and high level summaries, sign up for our daily newsletter, and follow us on Google News!
Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our daily newsletter for 15 new cleantech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly one on top stories of the week if daily is too frequent.
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.
CleanTechnica's Comment Policy
