Payback Time For Solar Plus Storage Could Be 5 Years In 2020

Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News!

Originally published on RenewEconomy.
By Sophie Vorrath

The point of “mass adoption” of household battery storage could arrive in Australia as soon as 2020, a new report from UBS has predicted, at which time the payback period for storage systems for solar households would be just five to six years.

The UBS Utilities Sector report, published on Monday and covered in-depth on RenewEconomy, says that if storage system costs fell at 20 per cent per year (as UBS has predicted, and as they have done over the past 18 months) for another five years – six years for households without solar – households with PV systems could achieve payback periods of between five and six years.

As the table below shows, the UBS estimates are based on AGL Energy’s 7kWh Power Legato (pictured below) battery system. And they show the average price of a lithium-ion battery storage system dropping from just over $9,000 now, to $3,510, or $3,960 for households with PV.

Screen-Shot-2015-09-14-at-1.05.22-pm

The table also forecasts that households installing battery storage can save between $585 (without PV) and $660 (with PV) a year on electricity – a proposition, says UBS, that “should make some storage relatively attractive to most households.”

“We don’t expect households to go off grid,” says the report, titled Energiewende: Aussie style. “But we do think that ‘hybrid households’ will be both economic from the consumer point of view and desirable from the grid’s point of view.”

And as the table above shows, this includes those households that haven’t yet – or can’t – installed solar. Because, as the UBS analysts note, battery storage does not require a detached house – solar PV does.

If utility-scale solar was priced low enough in the middle of the day, the report says, even households without solar would be incentivised to install storage systems, so that they could charge the battery in the middle of the day and consume the cheaper energy in the evening.

“If the consumer sees an attractive storage price (payback periods of 5-6 years) we think they will likely finance that themselves,” the report says.

The report notes that in the hybrid model, households use some storage to maximise self-consumption of their rooftop solar electricity whilst still being connected to, and even dependent on, the grid.

“The grid still has to be paid for increasing fixed costs,” it says, “but its average capacity utilization increases and the investment in storage should mean less investment in the grid in terms of peak and largely unused capacity, but more investment in the intelligence of the grid.”

The report also points out that storage would also help to manage the swing in capacity as utility scale PV output drops in the afternoon, prior to the pickup in wind generation.

Reprinted with permission.


Have a tip for CleanTechnica? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our CleanTech Talk podcast? Contact us here.

Latest CleanTechnica TV Video


Advertisement
 
CleanTechnica uses affiliate links. See our policy here.

Guest Contributor

We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people, organizations, agencies, and companies.

Guest Contributor has 4378 posts and counting. See all posts by Guest Contributor