CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Fossil Fuels fracking water resources WRI report

Published on September 3rd, 2014 | by Tina Casey

12

Fracking Boom Hits Water Wall

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

September 3rd, 2014 by
 
The World Resources Institute has released a new report that lays out the potential for water scarcity to put the brakes on oil and gas fracking among the world’s top 20 shale countries, including the US and Russia. When you take geopolitics into account, that’s quite an interesting angle on top of the environmental and climate risks we’ve been covering.

The new report, Global Shale Gas Development: Water Availability & Business Risk ranks the top 20 countries according to potential commercial reserves.

fracking water resources WRI report

Global Shale Gas Development (screenshot) via WRI.

Fracking And Water Resources

For those of you new to the topic, fracking is a drilling method that enables oil and gas to be extracted from shale formations. It has been used in the US for many years, but until recently fracking wells in the US were relatively shallow and located in sparsely populated areas.

Modern fracking is a different story altogether. The technology to drill deeper, and horizontally, has enabled fracking to take hold in more populated areas including the Marcellus shale in Pennsylvania and other Northeast states. Modern fracking operations can also require millions more gallons per well than previously, and consequently millions more gallons of contaminated wastewater.

A Bush-era loophole in federal clean water regulations has stymied EPA oversight, but the agency has found workarounds in some cases, including a record fine against Chesapeake Energy.

Meanwhile, evidence of water resource impacts is beginning to mount, as local governments and other stakeholders become more aware of the risks to water supplies and nature conservation areas.

Aside from water contamination issues, the sheer volume of water required for fracking opens up a whole other can of worms, namely, competition for water supply with agricultural, commercial, and residential users as well as for habitat preservation.

Water Availability & Business Risk

That’s where the new WRI report comes in. The full report is available here, but for those of you on the go the Executive Summary has plenty of details.

Here’s a quick rundown of the top 20 countries with the largest shale reserves:

40% of countries with the largest shale reserves have severely limited freshwater supplies.

38% of commercially viable shale gas deposits are located either in arid areas, or areas under high/extremely high levels of water stress.

386 million people live over shale plays, making water-related conflicts more likely around new hydraulic fracturing operations in populated areas.

That last item dovetails with the stakeholder concerns and competition we noted above. When you add other fracking-related concerns, including earthquakes, local air quality impacts, and potential negative impacts on existing economic activity such as the tourist industry, you’re looking at a lot of pushback coming down the road.

Check out Pennsylvania and New York, where local governments are successfully deploying zoning laws to prevent fracking operations, and you’ll see how much that pushback has grown in just the past few years.

WRI’s four recommendations for mitigating water risk won’t give much comfort to gas and oil industry stakeholders. Here’s the lowdown:

Conduct water risk assessments to understand local water availability and reduce business risk.

Increase transparency and engage with local regulators, communities, and industry to minimize uncertainty.

Ensure adequate water governance to guarantee water security and reduce regulatory and reputational risks.

Minimize freshwater use and engage in corporate water stewardship to reduce impacts on water availability.

Fracking, Water Resources, And Geopolitics

Russia has been playing the gas card in its dealings with Europe and Ukraine, and going by WRI’s report, it doesn’t seem likely that Russia will have to concern itself with water supply issues.

Russia ranks #9 out of 20 in shale gas resources but WRI ranks the country’s exposure to water stress in its shale play areas at low. Russia also ranks #1 for tight oil and has low exposure there, too.

On the other hand, the US ranks #5 for shale gas but gets a medium-to-high risk ranking from WRI. In the context of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the recent push for more US natural gas exports looks like it’s going to hit a wall.

Now here’s something else to add to the mix. Saudi Arabia is obviously off the charts when it comes to fracking and water risk because it is an arid region. However, the country’s state-owned Saudi Aramco recently announced that it has come up with cost-competitive ways to tap into its vast tight (non-shale) gas reserves.

The company also hinted that the tight drilling operation is low-hanging fruit, and it will eventually figure out a way to pry gas loose from its shale plays, presumably with minimal water use.

 

One more thing: major fossil companies are already hinting that they see a ceiling on the ability of US gas to compete in global markets over the long run, even though pressure to increase gas exports continues apace.

ExxonMobile, for example, just dropped a ton of cash to expand its Baytown, Texas facility for processing shale gas into plastic.

Hold on to your hats.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • Mint

    Going through the numbers, it looks like water pollution is a MUCH greater concern than water usage.

    Here are some number about Marcellus shale:
    http://exploreshale.org/#
    -12-20 million gallons used per day by 1500 wells getting fracked in 2011 (consistent with Gasland numbers of 2-9 million gallons per well), each frack giving production for a few years on average

    -895 billion cubic feet of natural gas produced in 1H2012 from 6400 total wells, so that’s about 5 million GJ of NG energy per day.

    So that’s 150 kWh of electricity from CCGT, but would only need 0.06 kWh to make that much water from the sea.

    I think that’s a pretty sound tradeoff, even for wells that are 1/10th as productive.

    The real worry is not the 4 gallons of water used, but whether fracking pollutes orders of magnitude more water. With good oversight and careful site selection it probably shouldn’t, but we don’t know for sure.

  • Kiwiiano

    Haven’t Origin Oil got a proven technology for restoring fracking waste water back to potable standards?
    Of course that doesn’t help communities finding their wells are contaminated unless the oil companies are willing to admit culpability and clean up their messes. Why is that little pink birdie up in the tree going “oink, oink”?

  • DGW

    The irony of using up and contaminating our water in order to burn more fossil fuel which leads to droughts with no usable aquifers left will leave future generations in utter disbelief.

    It’s the circle of death brought to you by the Koch Bothers and the fossil fools.

  • Mike333

    Fracking: The cigarette business model. Killing yourself and your neighbor for over 30 years for profit.

  • Will E

    frack the Sun and shale the Wind.
    no water needed, no water contamination.
    endless supply, everywhere.
    go all electric.

    • F-u

      Yes go green and stop having so many energy consuming kids.

      • Mike333

        Just educate girls, world wide, education is the only proven method of dropping birthrates.

        • Bob_Wallace

          Family planning education, access to birth control supplies, and jobs for women also help.

          • Calamity_Jean

            General health care for everyone, too. People are more willing to have fewer children if they feel fairly confident that the children they have are very likely to survive to adulthood.

      • Lynne Whelden

        Or generate wars world-wide. Genocide helps too.

    • GCO

      go all electric.

      with maybe a touch of thermal collectors for e.g. domestic hot water; directly going from sunlight to heat can be done so efficiently…

Back to Top ↑