CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Air Quality china pollution

Published on August 13th, 2014 | by Joshua S Hill

12

Beijing Cut Coal Use By 7 Percent, Proving Intentions

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

August 13th, 2014 by  

The Chinese capital of Beijing has been making a lot of noise of late with regards to fighting their well-publicized pollution levels.

In the past week alone, Chinese state media outlet Xinhua has revealed that the country will ban coal by 2020 in six inner-city Beijing districts; that China will ban the sale and import of “high-ash and high-sulfur coal from September 1″; and the latest piece of news, which goes a long way to proving the country’s intentions, announced that Beijing cut coal use in the first half of 2014 by 7%.

The move combats not only international pressure to literally clean up their act, but also mitigates public pressure to clean up Beijing’s notorious air pollution levels — which many will remember from the near-comical experiences during the Beijing Olympics.

Reuters reported the news from the official Xinhua news agency, the state press agency of the country. They note that the city has already started to close or relocate hundreds of factories and industrial plants, and is looking at introducing a congestion charge after already raising vehicle fuel standards.

Earlier this year, Xinhua reported that the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) had adopted revisions to the Environmental Protection Law, announcing that China had “declared war” against pollution “and pledged to fight it with the same determination the country battled poverty”.

After decades of negligible action towards their own impact on the environment, it would have been easy to dismiss China’s intentions as simply more lip service to placate the international community. However, the reality is much different. Time and time again China has announced sweeping shifts to their energy use — putting a lot of emphasis on developing one of the world’s premiere solar manufacturing industries.

Xinhua announced last week that the Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau intends to ban coal use in six inner-city districts by 2020, and replace it with clean energy. At the same time the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced that they would be banning the sale and import of high-ash and high-sulfur coal from September 1 this year.

It is also forbidden to sell sub-standard coal to individuals and organizations in areas where the burning of highly polluting fuels is not allowed, the NDRC said in a statement (via Xinhua again).

Less than a day later and Xinhua again reported that the head of the National Energy Administration had said China is aiming to install 13 GW worth of PV solar power in 2014 — a number that is, given China’s recent solar record, completely feasible.

This news comes at the same time as Australia is waiting for the hammer to drop on their own Renewable Energy Target, a move that will shatter the country’s already mediocre renewable energy industry. Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott has recently been quoted as backing coal as Australia’s future major-energy source, and one can only wonder what world we are living in where China is making environmental decisions that put Australia to shame.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, and I believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.



  • smartacus

    SUMMER ICE CAP 1.7 Million square kilometers larger than just 2 years ago

  • Bob_Wallace

    Google is willing to be your friend…

    http://www.koalanet.com.au/australian-slang.html

  • Zer0Sum

    Australia should already have a double dissolution due to the senate denying new laws 4 times already. The Governor General is derelict of duty and the local press couldn’t care less about it.

    Phony Tony and his gang of cronies are being given carte blanche to dismantle the Australian renewable energy industry and no one in Oz has the kahunas to do any thing about it.

    Instead he is riding high on the drama in Ukraine and Iraq by pretending to everyone that he is a war president.

    Australians have successfully managed to replace Gdubuyah. That is no small achievement.

    • Calamity_Jean

      “Australians have successfully managed to replace Gdubuyah.”

      Not quite. Abbott hasn’t attacked an innocent bystander country (yet).

  • JamesWimberley

    The announcements (apart from high-sulphur imports) are about Beijing, not all China. But it’s the capital of a centralised authoritarian state. The obvious reading of the play being given to these decisions by Xinhua (=Tass) is that Beijing is being held up as an example.

    • eveee

      Face is culturally important, but where the head leads, will the body follow

  • Matt

    Oz is hitching its future to coal and coal exports, but its biggest two markets (China and India) might not be there. China because it is start to turn away from coal and India because they can’t afford to import it.

    • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Yeah, the current “leaders” of Australia really need a different title. And it makes me wonder: is political awareness and action about as poor in Australia as it is in the US? i thought it would be better. (in other words: how the hell did Oz end up with such horrible leaders as it has right now?)

      • Mike333

        Anywhere the Murdoch “news” monopoly runs, comes economic and environmental disaster.

Back to Top ↑