CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power Fire At Fault In Wind Farm Failures

Published on July 20th, 2014 | by Joshua S Hill

8

New Report Finds Fire At Fault In Wind Farm Failures

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

July 20th, 2014 by
 
A new report has found that the number of incidents of wind turbines catching fire are a sizeable issue for the wind industry, and a problem that is not being accurately reported on, with an estimated ten times more fires occurring than are actually being reported.

Fire At Fault In Wind Farm Failures

Image Credit: North News

The new report from researchers at the Imperial College of London, the University of Edinburgh, and SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden is the result of a global assessment of the world’s wind farms, estimated at around a total of 200,000 wind turbines. The results showed that instead of the publically reported 11.7 fires a year, the reality is that more than 117 separate fires are breaking out in wind turbines per year.

“Wind turbines are viable sources of renewable energy that can assist the world to reduce emissions and help wean us off fossil fuels,” said Dr Guillermo Rein, from the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Imperial College London.“However, fires are a problem for the industry, impacting on energy production, economic output and emitting toxic fumes. This could cast a shadow over the industry’s green credentials.

“Worryingly our report shows that fire may be a bigger problem than what is currently reported. Our research outlines a number of strategies that can be adopted by the industry to make these turbines safer and more fire resistant in the future.”

Wind farm fires are still reporting as less than other energy industries, with other sectors such as oil and gas more likely to see fires as part of the energy generation process. However, a single fire can have devastating economic costs on such expensive equipment.

The authors of the report point out that “the three elements of the fire triangle” are all in evidence in wind turbines — “fuel (oil and polymers), oxygen (wind) and ignition (electric, mechanical and lighting) are represent and confined to the small and closed compartment of the turbine nacelle.” Additionally, “once ignition occurs in a turbine, the chances of externally fighting the fire are very slim due to the height of the nacelle and the often remote location of the wind farm.”

Fires are found to be the second-leading cause of catastrophic accidents in wind turbines, following blade failure, and are responsible from anywhere between 10% to 30% of reported turbine accidents since the 1980s.

The industry itself has not responded well to the report, with the UK’s leading renewable energy trade association, RenewableUK, hitting back at the reliability of the report itself.

“The wind industry welcomes any research that will help improve safety standards,” said Renewable UK’s Director of Health and Safety, Chris Streatfeild. “However, the industry would challenge a number of the assumptions made in the report, including the questionable reliability of the data sources and a failure to understand the safety and integrity standards for fire safety that are standard practice in any large wind turbine.”

The “questionable reliability of the data sources” refers to the author’s decision to rely on non-scientific industry sources. RenewableUK note that the researchers “have therefore chosen to draw their conclusions from data reported in newspapers and on anti-wind websites” because, as the authors write, “there is … very little scientific information available publically from which to evaluate the problem critically, since much of this information is proprietary.”

RenewableUK’s Chris Streatfeild continues:

“There is also a lack of context in the research relating to the actual level of fire risks present to workers and members of the public. Wind turbines are designed to international standards to meet mandatory health and safety standards including fire safety risks. State of the art monitoring systems ensure that the vast majority of turbine fires can be dealt with quickly and effectively. This is supported by an HSE-commissioned report in 2013, which concluded that the safety risks associated with wind turbines are well below all other comparable societal risks.”

RenewableUK certainly make a point, as the report (PDF) seems to rely upon “what is known and apparent” (p11) rather than striving to reach scientifically reliable and rigorous answers. The reality is that newspapers provide an unreliable data source, often reporting on the same incident from three different angles to create the appearance of three separate incidents. Nevertheless, the basic assumption of the paper — that clear and accurate industry-specific reporting of wind turbine fires is being diminished — needs to be addressed, and this paper will no doubt begin to challenge any attempts to bias such incidents.

The authors have provided several measures the industry can take to minimise and protect against wind turbine fires, but the most likely outcome from this report will be increased vigilance — both within and without the industry — of such fires and accurate reporting.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, a liberal left-winger, and believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.



  • Ronald Brakels

    And of course the ten times higher figure for wind turbine fires turns out to be nonsense. Here’s an article that digs into the details of the report:

    http://reneweconomy.com.au/2014/how-often-do-wind-turbines-catch-fire-and-does-it-matter-22952

  • http://www.michaeljberndtson.com/ Michael Berndtson

    If windmills sit on private land, reporting or public disclosure of any type of accident may be only voluntary. For instance, pipeline spills on farmland may also be under reported. It’s usually between the landowner and the line operator – until, of course, the spill is big enough. The question about fires and windmills seems similar. Some fires are small and dealt with quickly, while others are bigger. There’s insurance for these windmills, I’m assuming, correct?

    Rapid blogging uses the good old “who, what, where, why and how” of journalism, no? There’s already algorithms and web bots generating science content, extracted from various academic journals and science paper clearinghouses for us. A little follow up cold calling of the academics and those in practice my answer those essential questions.

  • Ronald Brakels

    So they are saying two out of three hundred wind turbines catch on fire in their lifetimes instead of two out of three thousand? Well this seems to be a non-problem to me because around here at least they seem to be replacing about nine out of ten burnt up wind turbines secretly, without any disruption, and for free. So really, this has got to be one of the nicer conspiracies out there. So much nicer than those reptiloid aliens.

  • Chatteris

    I’ll take turbine fires any day rather than Fukushimas!

  • http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/ Neil Blanchard

    The newest wind turbine designs are much simpler – direct drive instead of gear reduction transmission, and I’m sure this can be addressed.

  • UncleB

    Ongoing improvements of this fledgling technology . . . Expect massive improvements as the money and interests increase. Expect much higher efficiencies and more computer controlled situations. Solar Wind Wave Hydro Tidal Geothermal, all renewable, perpetual, eternal energy forms. . .

  • http://electrobatics.wordpress.com/ arne-nl

    The report says: “However, these numbers are believed to be only the tip of the iceberg, as many cases are not made public,”

    So the certainty expressed in the title of this article is not supported by the language used in the report.

    Futher critical reading would show why the conclusion is on shaky ground:

    “This statement is supported by the fact that the British newspaper The Telegraph[14] obtained information from the wind industry reporting that about 1500 wind turbine accidents occurred within the United Kingdom (UK) alone between and 2006 and 2010.This was confirmed independently by Renewable UK. CWIF statistics for the UK in that period documented only 142 accidents, which is just about 9% of what The Telegraph reported”

    I can not find the article on the site of The Telegraph anymore, but the title hints at what is happening here: “1,500 accidents and incidents on UK wind farms,”

    So what is the case? The Telegraph also counts ‘incidents’, which can be interpreted as something minor. Since a fire is not likely to be counted as merely an incident or a minor issue, it is likely that these unreported incidents are not fires. The researchers muddy the waters by omitting the word ‘incidents’ and only talking of ‘accidents’. Secondly the researchers simply extrapolate the 142 reported accidents to 1500, assuming the 1500 have the same percentage of fires. They simply assume that without any evidence whatsoever. This is not science!

    I see that CleanTechnica is feeding the opposition fo wind energy by spinning this report into an anti-wind article. Please stop doing that and report accurately.

  • Shiggity

    What wind turbine models and who / what company is doing the maintaining?

Back to Top ↑