CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Cap And Trade Moscow power plant emissions

Published on May 30th, 2014 | by Silvio Marcacci

8

China Just Made A Bigger Carbon Market Move Than Obama’s EPA Rules

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

May 30th, 2014 by
 

The Obama Administration is planning to release new regulations next week mandating up to a 25% cut in power plant emissions – it’s a potentially historic plan, and has rightfully gotten a ton of attention, but China may have just taken an even more important step to fight climate change.

A senior official in China’s planning ministry announced the country would launch a national carbon market starting in 2018, based on the six regional carbon markets it launched this year as pilot programs.

China is the world’s largest emitter of greenhouse gases, just ahead of America, and setting a national cap-and-trade market would not only help slow its exponential emissions growth while directing funding toward clean energy, but it could finally make an international climate agreement go from dream to reality.

Moscow power plant emissions

Power plant emissions image via CleanTechnica

Toward The World’s Largest Carbon Market

If China were to launch a national carbon market, the world would lose its largest excuse for failing to pass international climate legislation. National cap-and-trade legislation died in the U.S. Senate in 2009 largely on concerns doing so would hamstring the U.S. economically compared to China.

Since then, the two nations, as well as the larger developed-versus-developing nations divide, have stumbled over the issue of who gets to emit while growing in every UN climate conference. But establishing a national Chinese cap-and-trade system would literally change the game and could lead to a truly global carbon market.

The seven regional pilot programs, announced in 2011, cover China’s most industrialized (and thus biggest-emitting) regions. To date, the six launched markets (the final market will start operations later this year) cover 1,115 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually – that means combined, they’re second only to the European Union’s carbon market. In time, China intends to reduce carbon intensity 17% from 2010 to 2015, and up to 45% by 2020 compared to 2005.

“Carbon Pricing Policies Are Here To Stay”

Obviously, reducing emissions from the world’s largest polluter is a big deal, but China’s action becomes even clearer if we consider the global state of carbon markets. Earlier this week, the World Bank reported more than 60 carbon pricing systems are either in operation or in development across the world.

The cumulative value of these markets is roughly $30 billion, and China’s pilot market launches headlined a total of nine new markets opening since 2013. Combine China’s cap-and-trade action with new carbon markets in France and Mexico, and a potential linked carbon market spanning the North American West Coast, and the cause for optimism is clear.

“It is clear that carbon pricing policies are here to stay – the widespread use of these policies in all corners of the globe is striking,” said Alyssa Gilbert, lead author of the World Bank report. “The diversity of approaches will help policymakers learn what works and what doesn’t.”

Is America About To Follow Suit?

But back to why all this is relevant for U.S. emissions reduction action. America’s already home to two of the largest and best-functioning carbon markets, in California and the Northeast U.S., and astute observers note the pending power plant emissions rules will likely strengthen these regional markets.

If the Obama Administration carries through and allows states to use existing emissions-reduction systems to meet their requirements instead of developing their own systems, other states would have a blueprint to work against and existing markets would be bolstered by new allowance revenue.

Under this scenario, it’s not far-fetched to see new regional markets develop and link to existing markets, expanding the cap-and-trade footprint and creating a wider footprint that can balance any price ebbs and flows – just as in the California-to-Quebec market connection that started this year. In both California and the Northeast U.S., carbon markets have pumped millions into state coffers and clean energy development, while lowering emissions and keeping economies strong.

That all means Members of Congress from fossil fuel-dependent states, who have killed previous attempts at national carbon markets, would lose their two biggest arguments against nation carbon policy – that we’d lose economic competitiveness to China, and that we’d kill our local economies in the process.

Armed with momentum in the U.S. and China, as well as a framework to move forward on additional international market linkages, the world may finally be able to reach a global climate agreement this September at the U.N.’s Climate Summit.

 Tick Tock – Time’s Almost Up

And not a moment too soon, it seems. Global concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide passed a grim milestone this April, remaining above 400 parts per million (ppm) for an entire month for the first time in human history.

We’re not out of time yet, but the window for action is closing fast. The world’s carbon budget is on track to be spent in the next three decades, locking us into dangerous global warming – but carbon markets in China and the U.S. may turn all of that around. Hope springs eternal.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Silvio is Principal at Marcacci Communications, a full-service clean energy and climate-focused public relations company based in Washington, D.C.



  • Gwennedd

    Frankly this idea of taxing/trading carbon and/or emissions is just a “feel good” for FF corporations. I’ve seen what underhanded schemes about carbon trading is about. It’s just another market con. Some years ago, an airline offered passengers the chance to offset their carbon debt from flying by buying a tree for X many miles flown. People went for the idea. A year or so later some investigative journalist decided to check on the trees. There was a cleared field with some planted trees alright, but the trees were dead or near to it. No-one was looking after the trees which had been planted in the wrong place.
    I live in BC and the carbon tax has not made one bit of difference to people’s driving habits or energy consumption. Nor has it affected any business. People bitched about it for the first little while, then forgot about it. Out energy consumption IS down due to our utility company’s push to reduce, and because of CFLs and LEDs

  • Gwennedd

    Stupid question, but I don’t see it explained in the article; what does ETS stand for?

    • A Real Libertarian

      Emission Trading Scheme.

      • Gwennedd

        Thanks!

        • A Real Libertarian

          No problem.

  • Fred Knurks

    You have Australia looking nicely green, however our current federal government is determined to repeal our carbon tax. You don’t seem to have a colour for ‘scheduled for dis-implementation’. You probably figured no nation would be stupid enough…
    It is not clear that the legislation will get through the Senate, we hope that sanity will prevail.

    • LookingForward

      You are right about that.
      But the Australian government will be forced to come around, eventually, maybe they will “dis-implement” maybe they won’t, but by 2020, most of the world will be green with black stripes, then, if not sooner, they will have to come around.

      • Fred Knurks

        surely this govt. will be gone by 2016 – Or at least the current lunatic leaders. Hard to tell what the PUP will do, but not at all clear it will get through the senate. Will be interesting to see how it all goes.

Back to Top ↑