CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power ScreenShot913

Published on May 23rd, 2014 | by Joshua S Hill

4

United States To Reach 20 GW Solar PV By End Of Year

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

May 23rd, 2014 by
 
Writing on the NPD Solarbuzz blog, senior analyst Michael Barker has predicted that the US photovoltaic (PV) market is set to reach a cumulative total of 20 GW by the end of 2014, thanks primarily to continuing declines in cost.

Barker notes that with the US grid reaching a cumulative total of 10 GW during 2013, the country is on course to double that by the end of the year.

In conjunction with declining costs, Barker also notes “a push by project developers to move projects towards completion before a reduction in the federal investment tax credit” as another reason for the growth in the US PV industry.

The growth, as backed by new research featured in the NPD Solarbuzz North America PV Markets Quarterly report, represents “a doubling of cumulative solar PV capacity within two years, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) above 50% since 2006.”

US PV Market

Figure 1: Cumulative installed capacity in the US PV market, 2006-2014. Source: NPD Solarbuzz North America PV Markets Quarterly, April 2014

As the solar PV industry has matured it has not only become a highly sought after renewable energy, an alternative to the increasingly unattractive fossil fuel electricity sources, but it has also become a highly profitable investment. As a result, solar PV systems have been classed as a low-risk long-term revenue asset, making it increasingly attractive for installers and utility companies, as well as institutional investors and private owners and municipalities.

Barker notes, however, that “there are several risks that could affect solar PV growth in the US.

These include challenges at the state level to renewable portfolio standard (RPS) targets and net-metering programs, and the uncertainty related to the ongoing investigation into Chinese and Taiwanese PV components at the federal level.

If state-level policies were dramatically scaled-back, or the supply of PV modules was severely restricted, this could prompt a decline in demand or an increase in pricing.

Policy changes will inevitably take a while to filter through the appropriate bureaucratic channels, but any chance to trade cases could have a much quicker and wider impact, prompting a loss of investment confidence. Such lack of investor confidence has been the bane of the renewable energy industry in the UK, which has suffered from severe mixed signals from the government, affecting the industry at large, and causing the country to fall in rankings showing how attractive a country is for renewable energy investment. Nevertheless, the public and economic desire for a cleaner and more efficient electricity network is likely to continue to push solar PV investment for several years to come.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , ,


About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, a liberal left-winger, and believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.



  • http://electrobatics.wordpress.com/ arne-nl

    The title is not entirely accurate, ‘market’ is generally meant to refer to how much is installed per year, not cumulative sales.

    • Jim Seko

      As long as we’re nitpicking, you should have used the word, “headline” instead of “title”.

      • Ronald Brakels

        Why should the word headline have been used and not title? Couldn’t both words easily apply to the 41 characters at the top of the article? Or would that be 52 if spaces are counted as characters?

        • Jim Seko

          I used the word nitpicking but what I sbould have said is people like you are extremely annoying.

Back to Top ↑