CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Coal main

Published on March 24th, 2014 | by U.S. Energy Information Administration

9

More & More Coal Power Plants Are Being Retired

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

March 24th, 2014 by  

Originally published on the EIA website.

map of recently announced coal-fired electric generator retirements, as explained in the article text

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, company announcements since November 2013
Note: One gigawatt (GW) equals one thousand megawatts (MW)

The need to comply with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (MATS) regulations together with weak electricity demand growth and continued competition from generators fueled by natural gas have recently led several power producers to announce plans to retire coal-fired facilities.

Between 2012 and 2020, about 60 gigawatts of coal-fired capacity is projected to retire in the AEO2014 Reference case, which assumes implementation of the MATS standards, as well as other existing laws and regulations. The recently announced 5.4 gigawatts of retirements reflect particular strategies of coal plant operators and provide a view of some key drivers in coal plant retirement decisions.

Tennessee Valley Authority. On November 14, 2013, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) announced that it was retiring eight coal-fired units with nearly 3,000 megawatts (MW) of generating capacity. Two units at TVA’sParadise Fossil Plant (1,230 MW), Unit 8 at the Widows Creek Fossil Plant (465 MW), and all five units at itsColbert Fossil Plant (1,184 MW) are now slated for retirement. The current retirement plans are an addition to TVA’s previously reported retirement plans announced in 2011. TVA officials gave no fixed dates for the planned retirements, but they stated that the units will not operate beyond the MATS implementation date (April 2015).

South Carolina Electric & Gas. South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCEG) announced that it had ceased operations at its Canadys Station generating facility earlier in November. The 295-MW plant’s closing is part of SCEG’s efforts to reduce emissions and to comply with MATS regulations that are scheduled to take effect in 2015. SCEG originally planned to convert the units to natural gas before retiring them in 2018.

Consumers Energy. Consumers Energy (CE) petitioned the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) to approve a bond issue to cover costs pertaining to the closure, decommissioning, and demolition of three coal-fired power plants. The facilities, Units 4 and 5 of the B.C. Cobb Plant (312 MW), Units 7 and 8 of the J.C. Weadock Plant (310 MW), and Units 1, 2, and 3 of the J.R. Whiting Plant (325 MW), would cease operations by April 2016. CE stated that the units would be shut down because the installation of additional emissions controls necessary to achieve compliance with EPA environmental regulations would be uneconomical. It was announced on December 3, 2013, that MPSC had approved the bond issue.

Energy Capital Partners. New Jersey-based Energy Capital Partners (ECP) filed paperwork with the Independent System Operator of New England (ISONE) to close the Brayton Point generating facility in 2017 after it failed to reach a deal on a new power-purchase agreement. Brayton Point currently has agreements with ISONE through May 30, 2016. ISONE voted to reject the retirement of the coal-fired units on December 19, 2013, after which the company stated it would go forward with plans to retire all units. Three of the four Brayton Point generating units, totaling about 1,084 MW, are coal-fired; the remaining 435 MW of generator capacity are powered by oil or natural gas. ECP had just recently finalized the purchase of the 1,520-MW facility from Dominion Resources in September 2013.

Georgia Power. Georgia Power (GP) announced that it planned to file a request with the Georgia Public Service Commission (GPSC) to decertify Unit 3 at its Mitchell generating facility. If approved by the GPSC, GP plans to retire the 155-MW unit before the end of April 2015. GP had proposed to convert the unit to use biomass, but the conversion was determined not to be cost-effective.

Coal-fired electric generator retirements—announcements since November 2013

Plant / Units Plant Owner State Megawatts (MW)
Paradise / 1-2 Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) KY 1,230
Widows Creek / 8 TVA AL 465
Colbert / 1-5 TVA AL 1,184
Canadys / 2-3 South Carolina Electric & Gas SC 295
B.C. Cobb / 4-5 Consumers Energy (CE) MI 312
J.C. Weadock / 7-8 CE MI 310
J.R. Whiting / 1-3 CE MI 325
Brayton Point / 1-3 Energy Capital Partners MA 1,084
Mitchell / 3 Georgia Power GA 155
       Total 5,360 (5.4 gigawatts)

Principal contributor: Elias Johnson

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , ,


About the Author

-- the EIA collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment.



  • Green Globe

    That’s awesome. Keep them coming.

    -Cheers.

  • Bob_Wallace

    2012 coal nameplate generation was 336,341 MW (336.3 GW).

    http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_04_03.html

    60 GW closures will mean a 18% drop in ability to burn coal. Good start but we should get coal down to 0% by 2030.

    Coal is presently producing just under 40% of our electricity. If we tripled our wind and solar installation rate we could get rid of coal over the next 15 years.

  • Deep Time

    The War on Coal continues, and we’re winning some battles!

    • Ross

      While keeping the salvo fire concentrated on coal let’s assign a few batteries to lay down some fire on natural gas also.

      • IMPOed

        Fracking may actually be more harmful to this nation than coal,,,

        • Bob_Wallace

          I suppose it’s the metric one uses. Coal certainly kills more Americans.
          Coal certainly has ruined more mountains.

          • IMPOed

            I will not dispute that, just add to it, they have been fracking for decades around Pavillion, Wyoming and the water has become tainted with chemicals, it is virtually unusable, it is only a matter of time before our aquifers will become chemical laboratories, loaded with carcinogens, from the increase in this practice, plus the fact that the Exxon Protection Agency is being paid to look away.
            Coal production and usage has become an “in your face” this is what we do and there ain’t squat you can do about it, fracking will become the silent, hidden killer, slower than stalagmites, as sure as the sun.
            Please forgive my rant,,,

  • halslater

    This makes it clear why the Koch Bros are acting so insane and funding all sorts of radically right-wing nut groups. These are death-rattles and tell us we are on the right path and must keep the pressure on. While the east coast is retiring coal plants, the west coast is retiring nukes (we retired our coal decades ago).

  • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

    Goodbye and good riddance!

Back to Top ↑