CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power Image Credit: Energy Materials and Surface Sciences Unit (Yabing Qi)

Published on February 4th, 2014 | by James Ayre

5

Low-Cost Solar Cells Moving Closer Thanks To New Research On Electrodes

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

February 4th, 2014 by  

Low-cost solar cells appear to now be one step closer to becoming a commercial reality, based on the findings of new research from the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology (OIST).

The researchers at OIST have been working on the creation of solar cells based on organic materials that possess electrodes that are both flexible and transparent — potentially allowing for the fabrication of low-cost solar cells. This work has been detailed in a new paper, where electrodes made from various different materials are characterized in detail. Materials include: plastic, conductive material, and zinc oxide. The researchers have also devised new methods of cleaning the electrodes, in order to restore conductivity and function after periods of long-term storage.

Image Credit: Energy Materials and Surface Sciences Unit (Yabing Qi)

Image Credit: Energy Materials and Surface Sciences Unit (Yabing Qi)


OIST provides more:

Traditional silicon-based solar cells are expensive to make because of the cost of the raw materials and stringent fabrication requirements. Silicon-based solar cells are also rigid and opaque, meaning their usage and placement are limited. Qi and colleagues work with flexible conductive materials that are also transparent. The fabrication of the “Flextrodes,” as these flexible transparent electrodes have been named, is more cost effective and potentially easier to fabricate using a method called roll-to-roll coating, due to their flexible nature. For example, the main component for fabricating Flextrodes is PET, the same inexpensive and readily available plastic that comprises disposable drink bottles. In addition, their use and placement is potentially much more diverse than the silicon cells. For example, they may even be placed on windows since the organic solar cells can be made partially transparent.

Since these Flextrodes are a relatively new technology, basic surface science studies had not been conducted. In their recent paper, Qi and colleagues looked at their work function, surface conductivity and chemical states. They also observed that after an extended period of storage, Flextrodes had an insulating layer of contaminants on the surface that greatly reduced their efficiency and function. The researchers were able to show that two common cleaning methods, one using UV ozone treatment, the other using oxygen plasma treatment, were both effective in removing the contaminants and restoring function to the Flextrodes in a timely and cost-efficient way. The research demonstrated that these methods could easily be integrated into the solar cell fabrication process to regenerate ready-to-use Flextrodes.

The researchers think that low-cost organic solar cells are the wave of the future, and that this work should help to drive the technology forward, explaining that one of the major advantages to the technology is that, “unlike conventional silicon-based solar cells, the organic materials available to make the cells are virtually limitless.” This allows for, potentially, far cheaper fabrication costs.

The new findings were just published in the journal Organic Electronics.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , ,


About the Author

's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy. You can follow his work on Google+.



  • just_jim

    “unlike conventional silicon-based solar cells, the organic materials available to make the cells are virtually limitless.”

    As compared to the scarce and rapidly disappearing availability of sand that is the raw material of silicon based cells?

    Yes, I know that it is an energy intensive process to turn SiO2 to silicon, but to claim the raw material is scarce is just silly.

  • http://electrobatics.wordpress.com/ arne-nl

    ‘Cheap solar cells’, I think solar cells are already cheap, so perhaps better to talk about ultracheap solar cells.

    I think the lower efficiency of organic cells will prevent them from being widely used. Land is not free, roof area neither. Using more area adds cost. Also, having to install more panels for the same amount of energy will cost more in labor, racking, mounting materials and cabling.

    I see this technology mostly being used in developing countries where sunshine is abundant, and land and labor cheap.

    • Jouni Valkonen

      Remember that 99 % of new tech prototypes do not lead into commercial products. For theoretical scientific studies, the fraction is probably 99.9 %.

    • JamesWimberley

      I wish the authors of press releases for alternative solar technologies would realize that dissing the successful silicon incumbent merely makes them look out of touch.

      • Anne E

        I don’t think the author is dissing traditional solar cells, but simply trying to show that alternatives to environmentally costly and unfriendly technologies are moving forward. And as Jouni Valkonen stated, how much of this actually sees the light of day in the commercial sense is small. That doesn’t mean we can’t look for something that is potentially better.

Back to Top ↑