CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Biomass California high speed rail map complete

Published on July 16th, 2013 | by Guest Contributor

12

California High-Speed Rail To Have Net Zero Emissions

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone
July 16th, 2013 by
 

This article was first published on San Diego Loves Green.
By Roy L Hales

california high speed rail

Construction on the first 65 miles of California’s high-speed rail project is about to beginThat is despite a new bill from Congress’ transportation committee, which has blocked funding in 2014. The Republican-controlled House was too slow, they already provided $3.5 and the money can not be taken back. Now the California’s High Speed Rail Authority has released a report stating the project will produce zero net greenhouse gas emissions

This does not allay concerns about the impact this project would have on 11 endangered species along the route, but does address the problem of air pollution from the diesel machinery that will lay down the tracks.

“Our commitment is to make positive environmental contributions from day one,” said Authority CEO Jeff Morales. “High-speed rail will transform the state’s transportation system while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and providing environmental benefits for years to come.”

The CO2 produced during construction is to be offset by a tree planting program. Only recycled concrete and steel is to be used and contractors will be required to divert 75 % of their non-hazardous waste from landfills. “The contractors will also be directed to explore methods to reduce the amount of potable water used onsite. These practical activities, including anti-idling programs, water efficiency, energy efficiency, and the use of fuel-efficient vehicles are among those that have been proven effective for reducing both GHG emissions and costs on many infrastructure projects.”

The system is to run on 100% clean energy. “To estimate GHG emissions associated with the electricity purchased by the Authority for traction power, which is the power needed to propel the train along the rails, and facilities operations, the Authority assumed a mix of 20 percent solar, 30 percent wind, 45 percent geothermal, and 5 percent biogas (methane capture).” Thus the GHG emission reduction is calculated in terms of the number of passengers that choose to ride the high-speed rail system rather than use a car or airplane.

The Report’s Summary of Findings

The Report’s Summary of Findings

“This analysis of greenhouse gas reductions clearly demonstrates that the high-speed rail project is an integral part of California’s overall climate goals,” said California Air Resources Board Chairman Mary Nichols. “This project will serve in the near term as the backbone of a more sustainable growth strategy in the San Joaquin Valley, and over time will provide a climate-friendly transportation option linking southern and northern California.”

“This report details important steps that the High-Speed Rail Authority is taking to curb greenhouse gas emissions in California and embrace renewable energy during operations,” said Brian Kelly, Secretary of the California State Transportation Agency. “High-speed rail is a key part of meeting the state’s mobility, safety and sustainability objectives.”

In Europe, where high-speed rail systems have been is use for decades, they also have a track record of stimulating local economies.

“Lille diversified into knowledge-intensive, service-producing activities once it was connected via high speed rail to London, Paris and Brussels. High-speed rail investment helped the city turnaround from depopulation and declining economic sectors. After being connected to high-speed rail in 1981, Nantes has evolved from an industrial port to a major service sector hub and one of the world’s most livable cities.”

California high speed rail map complete

If the high-speed rail system proceeds according to plan, by 2029 it will connect San Francisco to Los Angeles. The cost for this first phase of construction is estimated at $68 billion. Phase two, which will extend the system to cover the 800 miles between Sacramento and San Diego, is to come later.

Yet there may be opposition in the Republican dominated House, which has just axed the funding for a similar project connecting Las Vegas to California.

“At a certain point, they have made it very clear that they are going to need $38 billion in federal funds,” said Jeff Denham, Chairman of the House Railway Committee.

(Read “San Diego and the hoped for Resurgence of passenger trains“)

Graphs and images taken from the California High Speed Rail Authority Report, Contribution of the High-Speed Rail Program to Reducing California’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Levels (June 2013).

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

is many, many people. We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people. :D



  • John Dough

    Bet it generates more energy than it burns and makes more money than it costs and makes no noise.

  • Pingback: California High-Speed Rail To Have Net Zero Emissions … » greennewstweets.com

  • TruthandtheAmericanWay

    So we have a green group who never cares where the money comes from making “pie-in-the-sky” projections based on who knows what. This is the very reason this state is in jeopardy – greenies all over the place screwing the system with the help of DF, BB, NP and ton of others of their ilk. P.S. I have done my part for years but the liberal university crap has got to stop.

    • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Not sure with your criticism. HSR is many times more efficient and cost-effective than business as usual / expanding the highway system (where people move around in vehicles and spaces many times their size emitting all sorts of fun pollutants… and all the while unable to do much of anything productive, unlike on a train).

  • Wayne Williamson

    Wow…68 billion for 65 miles…over a billion a mile. Maybe I just misread the article….

    • Ronald Brakels

      I know California has a lot of earthquake activity and all, but last time I checked it was 380 miles from San Francisco to Los Angeles.

      • http://zacharyshahan.com/ Zachary Shahan

        Ah, this is what happens when we give Aussies keyboards. Who told you to bring reality into this discussion? :D

        • Ronald Brakels

          Well, not everyone has the advantage of a Queensland education. We’ve had television for over 30 years. And as a result we know that San Francisco is the place where there is always a car chase where the vehicles do jumps on a series of steep hills and the tram line always loses control. (I’d really get that fixed if I was San Francisco.) And Los Angeles is the place where all the men except lawyers and cops wear scarves on their heads and walk around like Watson missing his friend saying, “Holmes!” and “Holmesboy!”

    • Bob_Wallace

      $68 billion is for the entire system.

      “Officials in April announced that a $985.1 million bid from a consortium
      led by Sylmar-based Tutor Perini was the top candidate out of five
      submitted to build the first 30-mile construction segment from Madera to
      Fresno. The bid came in below the authority’s estimated cost of $1.2
      billion to $1.4 billion.”

      http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2013/06/06/board-expected-to-approve-contract-for-1st-segment-of-california-high-speed-rail-line/

  • John Dough

    Gee, have they found a way to burn marihuana without emissions?

  • Steeple

    I’ll take the overs on both $68B and 2029, as genes routs as both of those numbers are

    • Steeple

      generous

Back to Top ↑