CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Batteries Rice researchers improve li-ion batteries with graphene nanoribbons

Published on June 17th, 2013 | by Tina Casey

3

Unzip A Carbon Nanotube, Find A Graphene Ribbon, Create A “Flexible” Li-Ion Battery

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

In what sounds like a solution in search of a problem, a few years ago researchers at Rice University figured out a way to create graphene ribbons by “unzipping” carbon nanotubes. Well, now it looks like a problem has been found, and it’s a big one with huge implications for the solar and wind power markets, to say nothing of electric vehicles and portable electronics. In the latest twist, the Rice team has applied carbon nanotube-derived graphene nanoribbons to energy storage, and the result is a promising new platform for creating more durable, lightweight and efficient lithium-ion batteries.

Rice researchers improve li-ion batteries with graphene nanoribbons

Zipper by IdentityPhotogr@phy.

How To Make A Graphene Nanoribbon

Before graphene (aka “the strongest material in the world”) came along, carbon nanotubes were the next big thing in advanced electronics, and Rice University was among the institutions looking for efficient, low cost ways to manufacture them in bulk.

In 2009 a research team at the university came up with a kind of low cost “carbon nanotube stew” based on common fluid-based industrial processes. That same year, another team developed a low cost method for “unzipping” carbon nanotubes — basically, slicing them straight down the middle — to create graphene nanoribbons.

The process involved splitting open a carbon nanotube by exposing it to sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate at room temperature. The result is graphene, a sheet of graphite only one atom thick with powerful conductive properties and a strength estimated at 200 times that of steel.

The graphene sheets resulting from this process are water-soluble and can be painted onto a surface using standard fabrication methods.

Applying Graphene Nanoribbons to Lithium-Ion Batteries

Despite its great promise for next-generation electronics and energy storage, graphene faces an enormous stumbling block in terms of cost-effective, commercial scale manufacturing, so the combination of low cost carbon nanotube production with low cost graphene production has given Rice a running start on the next step, commercial production of a competitively priced, next-generation lithium-ion battery.

For the latest experiments, the Rice team created graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes using a sodium/potassium solution. They used that to make a  “slurry” composed of graphene nanoribbons along with nanoscale particles of tin oxide and a bit of water, all bound together with cellulose gum, a common food additive.

As reported in the current issue of the American Chemical Society’s ACS Nano journal, when the researchers applied the slurry to the anode of small “button-style” lithium-ion batteries the results were promising.

After 50 discharge cycles, the batteries retained far more capacity — more than double — than Li-ion batteries using standard graphite anodes.

Mike Williams of Rice University runs down the numbers:

“Lab tests showed initial charge capacities of more than 1,520 milliamp hours per gram (mAh/g). Over repeated charge-discharge cycles, the material settled into a solid 825 mAh/g.”

That could be just the beginning. According to Williams, lead researcher Jian Lin is confident that the new battery could handle “many more” cycles without a significant loss of capacity.

Part of the reason for improved durability is the increased flexibility that graphene nanoribbons lend to the anode. Conventional Li-ion batteries use silicon and other materials that break down and lose efficiency. With a graphene nanoribbon platform the tin oxide particles maintain a consistent size, rather than expanding and contracting.

The Future Of Energy Storage

We’ve noted before that sulfur-lithium technology is emerging as a promising alternative to conventional lithium-ion batteries, but as the Rice project demonstrates there is still vast room for improvement without sulfur. Don’t look for that “affordable” Tesla to make the $20,000 range any time soon (last we heard, $40,000 was the mark), but a significant drop in the cost of advanced batteries will make a huge difference in the up-front cost of owning an electric vehicle.

The development of advanced energy storage also has vast implications for national security as well as domestic well-being. As hammered home with great regularity by the Department of the Navy among others, the global petroleum market is an increasingly volatile and risky place to bank on the future. Intermittent sources like wind and solar are promising, domestically sourced alternatives, but mainstreaming them depends on pushing energy storage into utility-scale territory.


That explains why both the Office of Naval Research and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research provided support for the new Rice project along with Sandia National Laboratory and Boeing.

The Navy and Air Force research offices are also behind a plethora of funding for other graphene projects, including a Navy-funded graphene nanoribbon project aimed at exploiting the terahertz band.

Follow me on Twitter and Google+.

 







Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

Tina Casey specializes in military and corporate sustainability, advanced technology, emerging materials, biofuels, and water and wastewater issues. Tina’s articles are reposted frequently on Reuters, Scientific American, and many other sites. Views expressed are her own. Follow her on Twitter @TinaMCasey and Google+.



  • Wayne Williamson

    Its nice they did the 50 cycles…now do something real like 2000+. Something simple to get a 100% increase would be great….

    • JamesWimberley

      It took them 2 months to go through the 50 cycles. The time limit was presumably imposed by the need to publish and claim priority.

  • JamesWimberley

    It’s nice that progress in materials science can be made in small uiversity laboratories using cheap equipment, graduate student slaves, and ingenuity. That’s why we are seeing lots of it.

    A few years back materials scientists at Cambridge University (the original one) published photographs of twisted buckystring. The PR pitch was cables for space elevators. I’m sure they were really thinking of something much closer to market like body armour.

Back to Top ↑