CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power Screen-Shot-2013-04-30-at-9.19.52-AM

Published on May 25th, 2013 | by Giles Parkinson

11

How Fossil Fuel Incumbents Hope To Tame Solar Juggernaut

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

May 25th, 2013 by
 

This post first appeared on RenewEconomy

The Australian solar sector is warning that the industry could be facing its toughest challenges in the coming years, as cost-competitive solar PV puts enormous strain on the business models of fossil fuel technologies.

Muriel Watt, the chair of the Australian Photovoltaic Association, said the solar industry should be prepared for a fight-back from the incumbent businesses in the form of regulatory and tariff protection, and even a campaign to demonise solar in the same way that had affected wind farm developments.

She cited the release of a report last week by the Electricity Supply Association of Australia, which represents many of the incumbents, was just a foretaste of things to come. Our report on the impact on coal-fired power stations is another example of the damage being inflicted on the industry. Tariff changes and connections issues are already becoming common.

“Things are getting serious,” Watt told the Solar 2013 conference in Melbourne. “The incumbents have found that renewables actually work. They thought that we would always be in the R&D bucket.”

More than 2.5GW of solar PV had been installed in Australia, and this could rise to at least 8GW by 2020, and to as high as 34GW by 2030 – with modules on households and businesses, as well as utility scale installations.

Watt said this will have a real impact on incumbents, which are already having network load factors reduced, retail kilowatt hour sales dropping, and fossil fuel plans closing down or operating less.

“This threatens the entire electricity structure which is based on kilowatt hours being passed through grid or sold at retailer level,” she said. Other associated technologies such as storage, solar hot water, demand management and energy efficiency would have a similar impact on demand from the grid, which would respond by putting prices up, giving further motivation for consumers to seek alternatives. This was a theme taken up by the head of the Clean Energy Finance Corporation Oliver Yates.

These are the examples cited by Watt of how the incumbent utilities would attempt to push back on solar:

Low buy back rates – low or no payments for electricity exported back to the grid from rooftop solar systems. This has already happened in most states.

Gross metering – a proposal made in Queensland which would force households to sell all the output from their rooftop systems to the grid operators, and buy it back at a higher price

Higher fixed charges – This is happening across Australia, and was the basis of the ESAA paper, but Watt and others in the industry say it ignores the benefits brought by solar PV to the network.

Restrictions on new connections – like higher fixed charges, this is happening at both household and commercial level. Some grid operators insist on having the right to curtail output when they don’t want it.

Discriminatory offerings: There was evidence that retailers were offering discounts to consumers but refusing them to solar users. Watt questioned whether discrimination between customer types on the issue of connection fees, discount and charges was legal. “They are going to be pushing really hard to get these sort of options on the table. Even if they got half of it, they would feel it was a success.”

Restrictions on operation – Some grid operators insist on having the right to curtail output when they don’t want it.

Attempts to divide customers with have and have nots. – another theme from the ESAA report and other utility-sponsored studies which seeks to portray a large disadvantage to those without solar. She used this graph below (and Yates used a similar one) to highlight how the incumbent grid was responsible for most of the cost rises, but green energy got most of the blame.

Screen-Shot-2013-04-30-at-9.19.52-AM

Mobilizing anti renewable lobby groups – the industry is concerned that the same tactics deployed by the anti-wind lobby could be adapted for solar. As a foretaste, several landowners had opposed the siting of the proposed 20MW Royalla solar farm in the ACT – which is to be the largest in Australia to date. The landowners said they wished to sub-divide their properties and were concerned about the impact of the solar farm on visual amenity. “In a general sense people like solar … but when you start to move to large systems, putting solar in a field or next to farms next to them, that could create a different dynamic,” Watt said.

Political and regulatory support – Watt said that the current rules of the National Electricity Market favour the incumbents. The regulatory framework has to change – it has facilitated overspending and doesn’t cater for reduced demand and demand management measures. (Another point highlighted by Yates and Greens leader Christine Milne)

Watt cited the example of recent inquiries into protecting networks against natural hazards such as storms and bushfires. Proposals such as laying transmission underground had been considered, but cheaper and most efficient options such as distributed generation and min-grids had not.

But she said it was inevitable that the industry would have to move to a service and energy solutions model rather than a pure volume sales model. This would include “net zero energy buildings”, storage, and links to the electric vehicle rollout. This is something that the utilities have considered, but do not yet appear ready to embrace.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

is the founding editor of RenewEconomy.com.au, an Australian-based website that provides news and analysis on cleantech, carbon, and climate issues. Giles is based in Sydney and is watching the (slow, but quickening) transformation of Australia's energy grid with great interest.



  • Pingback: Australia Approaches 22% Renewables By 2020, 51% by 2050 |

  • Pingback: Australia Approaches 22% Renewables By 2020, 51% by 2050

  • Rezwan Razani

    Sounds painful and protracted. A thought: given the resistance put up by incumbents and their effectiveness against modest change, why not unleash nuclear power? Pandora’s Promise and this article http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/mar/21/pro-nuclear-japan-fukushima make a compelling case about how clean and renewable nuclear power actually is. If the incumbents won’t yield to renewable, you have a better chance of unseating them with nuclear power.

    United, nuclear and renewable can get rid of the CO2 threat of fossils. And then you can go back to the arduous jockeying for position between each other – but with the threat of fossils well behind you. What say you? The “incumbents” have been playing divide and conquer. Time to unite and move forward.

    • Bob_Wallace

      Well, we could turn to nuclear.

      Of course that would mean that we would spend a lot more money and it would take decades longer to get rid of fossil fuels. But if that doesn’t bother you then nuke it!

  • Hans

    Are electricity production and distribution in the same hands in Australia?

  • Mark W

    It’s eminent the industries will move to proceed with high surge charge on rooftop grid solar power exacerbated by subsidies for solar systems, high-priced buy back electricity from rooftop solar, and no demand for solar energy on the network from utility customers for green energy between 10am to 3pm.

    Electricity Supply Association of Australia solar customers were overcompensated and not making a contribution to the cost of providing network services.

    Queensland State governments seriously considering to moving towards a Solidarity tax, contribution to the cost of providing network services, unfair system, fairer. Grid solar power adversely impact on the state network grid operations in Queensland, the state reported. Solar power posed significant damage across the residential distribution network. While Electricity companies in New South Wales and Western Australia have reported the same damage situation.

    The Queensland government has revealed has lost hundreds of millions in revenue from number of operating each coal fired power station and is endeavouring recover costing from grid rooftop solar powered homes, as the financial crisis looms to breaking point. The Queensland government has pointed out in the revenue loss is in the same amount of distributed in payments to rooftop solar powered homes. If the problem is not fix, the government will most likely be selling public hospitals, public schools, and that doesn’t work, sell the polls and wires to a private operator to up the system costing to all.

    • jack

      yup, clear as mud mate.

  • stellar_gr

    Resistance is futile.

    • Ross

      Know your enemy.

      They’re going to have a hard time making people hate solar.

      • Marshall Harris

        And they will still try.

        • Ross

          No room for complacency.

Back to Top ↑