CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Biomass lanfill gas

Published on March 26th, 2013 | by James Ayre

3

Hydrogen Gas From Burned Garbage?

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

March 26th, 2013 by  

Millions of tons of toxic ash are created every year from the burning of refuse. This potentially-dangerous material is typically simply dumped in landfills (or, in some countries, used in construction). Rather than simply discard this toxic material, why not do something useful with it? And that’s exactly what researchers at Lund University have done. Researchers there have developed a process to produce hydrogen gas from the ash.

lanfill gas

Image Credit: Landfill via Shutterstock

The technique appears to have great potential: “20 billion litres of hydrogen gas a year, or 56 gigawatt-hours (GWh). Calculated as electricity, the energy is the equivalent of the annual needs of around 11 000 detached houses.”

Hydrogen gas has been emerging as an potentially very important energy source in recent years, primarily because of its portability and ease of storage. And with how widespread refuse incineration is in Europe, there’s great potential there.


 
“The ash can be used as a resource through recovery of hydrogen gas instead of being allowed to be released into the air as at present. Our ash deposits are like a goldmine,” said Aamir Ilyas, Doctor of Water Resources Engineering at Lund University and the developer of the technique.

The technique is rather simple:

[It] involves placing the ash in an oxygen-free environment. The ash is dampened with water, whereupon it forms hydrogen gas. The gas is sucked up through pipes and stored in tanks. It is the heavy, grit-like bottom ash that is used. In combustion, a lighter fly ash is also formed. The bottom ash remains in quarantine, in the open air, at the site for up to six months to prevent leaching of environmentally harmful metals and the risk of hydrogen gas being formed, since accumulation of hydrogen during indoor storage can result in explosion.

A bonus is that this method removes the risk of hydrogen gas. It also reduces the strain on our landfill sites.

In reference to why this new technique is important even with the rapid growth of solar and wind energy in recent years, Kenneth M. Persson, Professor of Water Resources Engineering, had this to say: “There will not be one universal solution that will be used to generate energy. We need to find a number of solutions.”

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy. You can follow his work on Google+.



  • http://twitter.com/djm12 Doug

    Nathan- the garbage does not produce hydrogen as reported. It generates methane, which then requires a substantial energy input to produce the H2. The H2 must then be stored in large containers with pressures of up to 10000 psi. From a chemical perspective, creating H2 to burn as fuel is not particularly attractive.

  • Ronald Brakels

    The bad news is the process creates CO2. And it doesn’t get rid of the ash. The total amount of ash that is hydrogen is quite minimal. It will make the ash more stable, but so little hydrogen is produced per tonne of ash I doubt it would be worth it. Twenty billion litres of hydrogen a year may sound like a lot but it is less than 4% the combined hydrogen output of humanity’s digestive systems.

    • http://twitter.com/djm12 Doug

      The human body doesn’t produce H2, it produces methane.

Back to Top ↑