CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world.


CO2 Emissions Image Credit: Wikipedia

Published on March 19th, 2013 | by James Ayre

2

Concrete With Lower-Carbon Footprint Created From Biofuel Waste

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

March 19th, 2013 by
 
A new form of concrete, stronger and with a lower carbon footprint, has been created by researchers utilizing some of the waste products of biofuel production. Concrete is an extremely widely-used material, and because of this has a rather significant carbon footprint, accounting for between 3-8% of global carbon dioxide emissions. The development of a concrete with a much lower carbon footprint could be significant.

Image Credit: Wikipedia

Image Credit: Mitch Kreis

“The idea is to use bioethanol production byproducts to produce a material to use in concrete as a partial replacement of cement,” said Feraidon Ataie, doctoral student in civil engineering. “By using these materials we can reduce the carbon footprint of concrete materials.”

Concrete is a mixture of three main components: portland cement, water, and aggregate. In order to cut back on the carbon footprint of concrete, the researchers from Kansas State University have been looking for environmentally friendly materials to replace the portland cement.

“It is predicted that bioethanol production will increase in the future because of sustainability,” Ataie said. “As bioethanol production increases, the amount of the byproduct produced also increases. This byproduct can be used in concrete.”

Specifically, the researchers have been looking at the byproducts that result from the production of cellulosic ethanol (biofuel made from inedible materials such as wood chips and grain husks). The focus is on these byproducts because of their perceived lack of value — the byproducts of other forms of biofuel production, such as corn ethanol production, are generally sold as cattle feed.

“With the cellulosic ethanol process, you have leftover material that has lignin and some cellulose in it, but it’s not really a feed material anymore,” Kyle Riding, assistant professor of civil engineering and Ataie’s faculty mentor, said. “Your choices of how to use it are a lot lower. The most common choices would be to either burn it for electricity or dispose of the ash.”

But when the material is added to cement, it reacts chemically to make the concrete noticeably stronger. “The researchers tested the finished concrete material and found that replacing 20 percent of the cement with cellulosic material after burning increased the strength of the concrete by 32%.”

Interesting, and potentially very-useful, but biofuels have some significant problems. It remains to be seen how much they will be a part of the world’s energy supply in the future.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , ,


About the Author

's background is predominantly in geopolitics and history, but he has an obsessive interest in pretty much everything. After an early life spent in the Imperial Free City of Dortmund, James followed the river Ruhr to Cofbuokheim, where he attended the University of Astnide. And where he also briefly considered entering the coal mining business. He currently writes for a living, on a broad variety of subjects, ranging from science, to politics, to military history, to renewable energy. You can follow his work on Google+.



  • Pingback: Improved Concrete Via Use Of Sunflower Seed Husks | CleanTechnica

  • Otis11

    Wow… Reading this article, the first thing that sticks out is Cement that’s 32% stronger. Unless there’s an issue being overlooked, that’s going to have a pretty fast uptake, and probably a price premium until they establish enough supply…

    Reducing the Carbon footprint is just a bonus!

Back to Top ↑