CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Uncategorized no image

Published on February 20th, 2013 | by Joshua S Hill

2

California Requiring 50 MW Of Energy Storage For Local Requirements

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

February 20th, 2013 by  

Last week the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) unanimously approved a long-term procurement decision that orders Southern California Edison (SCE) — the primary supplier of electricity for much of Southern California — to procure between 1,400 and 1,800 megawatts of energy resource capacity in the Los Angeles basin to meet long-term requirements by 2021.

The good news is that, of those numbers, the CPUC instructed that at least 50 MW be procured from energy storage resources, as well as up to an additional total of 600MW of capacity required be procured from preferred resources — which now include energy storage resources.

In his introduction before the dais, Commissioner Michel Peter Florio, the Assigned Commissioner responsible for the CPUCs long-term procurement planning rulemaking, expressed the rationale for the “monumental” decision during the CPUC’s discussion, stating “we need to move beyond paralysis by analysis with respect to energy storage.”

The CPUC’s final decision included a need for energy storage resources to be considered “along with preferred resources” including energy efficiency, demand response, and distributed generation.

Janice Lin, Executive Director of the California Energy Storage Alliance (CESA) and Managing Partner of Strategen Consulting, LLC, said that “this landmark decision represents a major breakthrough for energy storage market development in California and nationwide.”  According to Lin, “required energy storage procurement under this decision provides a much needed market signal that energy storage will be considered as a key asset class to help California address its long term local reliability needs.”

Energy storage will become a critical component of many renewable energy solutions as the industries develop, especially for intermittent generation methods — like wind and solar — so as to keep supply regular. For the moment, however, investments by government bodies in energy storage as a viable alternative is vital to the growth of the technology.

Source: California Energy Storage Alliance

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

I'm a Christian, a nerd, a geek, a liberal left-winger, and believe that we're pretty quickly directing planet-Earth into hell in a handbasket! I also write for Fantasy Book Review (.co.uk), and can be found writing articles for a variety of other sites. Check me out at about.me for more.



  • Dave2020

    This “monumental” decision should have been taken long ago. The systems now in operation are already inefficient and getting steadily more wasteful.

    Who decided that “energy efficiency, demand response, and distributed generation” were the “preferred resources” anyway? That was a badly flawed analysis.

    A logical, holistic analysis around the turn of the century would have avoided the paralysis.

    “a much needed market signal that energy storage will be considered as a key asset.”

    There never can be a functional ‘market’ with monopoly infrastructure. That’s just brainless ideology.

    In the UK, this lunacy is terminal, because we don’t have any public bodies in a position to decide what procurement is necessary, short-term or long-term! Policy is all about inventing new market “incentives”, which inevitably means (the consumer) paying top price, or nothing gets built.

    One section of the asylum wants 26GW of nuclear and another section 26GW of new gas-fired plant. At best, one third would like to see 26GW of off-shore wind, but they haven’t even thought about energy storage yet!

  • Tfill

    Very encouraging!!

Back to Top ↑