CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Green Economy Image Credit: Solar Panel via Cardaf /Shutterstock

Published on February 11th, 2013 | by Adam Johnston

3

French Solar Power Generation Advances By 67% In 2012

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

February 11th, 2013 by
 
French solar energy generation in 2012 saw some big gains. 

According to the 2012 French Electricity Report, 4 terrawatt hours (Twh) of solar energy came from photovoltaic systems, making up for 0.79% of France’s energy demand last year.

Meanwhile 1.022 gigawatts (GW) of solar energy was installed, boosting the overall solar capacity to 3.5 GW.

Image Credit: Solar Panel via Cardaf /Shutterstock

The report noted that the leaps and bounds made by solar in France is helping to boost the country’s overall renewable energy mix to 16.4%.

As the sixth overall global solar PV market in 2012, France is looking toward solar as an energy source to get its country away from nuclear fuel dependency. French president Francois Hollande said last fall he hopes to cut France’s nuclear demand from 75% to 50% by 2025, while in the next few months rolling out a new solar strategy to give underlying support.

Nuclear still made up nearly three-quarters of the country’s energy demand last year, despite generating 3.8% less in 2012.

With the new French President Hollande in charge, and nuclear power far more expensive and unpopular as an alternative, French solar energy may well be positioned to continue to nibble away at nuclear’s dominance.

Main Sources: Réseau de Transport d’Electricité (RTE) / PV Magazine

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Print Friendly

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , ,


About the Author

Is currently studying at the School of the Environment Professional Development program in Renewable Energy from the University of Toronto. Adam graduated from the University of Winnipeg with a three-year B.A. combined major in Economics and Rhetoric, Writing & Communications. Adam also writes for Solar Love and also owns his own part time tax preparation business. His eventual goal is to be a cleantech policy analyst, and is currently sharpening his skills as a renewable energy writer. You can follow him on Twitter @adamjohnstonwpg or at www.adammjohnston.wordpress.com.



  • Otis11

    So if 75% is nuclear and 16% is RE, are the other 9% FFs?
    What order are they retiring them? FFs first? Nuclear first? Order of retirement age?

    Thanks for the article!

    “Nuclear still made up nearly three-quarters of the country’s energy demand last year, despite generating 3.8% less in 2012. However, nuclear still made up nearly three-quarters of the country’s energy demand last year.” –Is that second sentence necessary?

    • Ronald Brakels

      I would hope they would retire capacity in order of danger. To me fossil fuel plants seem the most dangerous. We’ve already built up Adelaide port once and turned all the ground floors of the buildings into basements and we’re in no hurry to do it again. And then there’s the danger that all this radioactive material we have cluttering up our mines in Australia might not get shipped out of the country and sent somewhere far away, like France. Of course, people actually living in France instead of as far away away from France as it is possible to get, might have a different perspective.

      • Otis11

        Hahaha, nice. Yeah as long as the nuclear plants already built are operating safely might as well let then keep going and stop all the FF plants, but doesn’t make sense to build any more nuclear just from an economic perspective, so those mines look like they’re going to stay – unless Australia sells to the Middle East or China…

Back to Top ↑