CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Clean Power sandiadishsirling_600x400

Published on September 10th, 2012 | by Andrew

16

Where’s the Clean Energy Stimulus? Q2 a Record Quarter for US Solar Market

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

September 10th, 2012 by  

 
Republicans and other opposing parties—i.e. Big Oil—are intensifying populist rhetoric and efforts to derail the Obama Administration’s legislative and policy initiatives to promote and foster solar, wind, and renewable energy development and market growth in the US. The good news: the US solar energy market continues to expand, creating green jobs as well as clean, reliable, and local power for individuals, communities, commerce, industry, and public services across the country.

US solar energy market growth surged 45% higher quarter-to-quarter in Q2 2012 and 116% year-over-year (YoY), according to the Solar Energy Industry Association and GTM Research’s latest quarterly “U.S. Solar Market Insight” report.

The results mark Q2 2012 as the second-best quarter in the history of US solar energy, with 742 MW of solar power having been installed. It was also the best-ever quarter recorded for utility solar. Utility solar power installations totaled 477 MW in Q2, according to the SEIAGTM report.


 

 

Record 2Q for US Solar Market

Credit: SEIA, GTM Research “U.S. Solar Market Insight” Q2 2012

Assertions to the contrary notwithstanding, solar and renewable energy are giving a much-needed boost to US job creation and the economy, and federal government support is a critical factor supporting progress. More than 100,000 Americans working for some 5,600 mostly small businesses across all 50 states are now employed in the US solar energy market.

More than eight states installed 10 MW of solar power or more in the second three months of 2012: California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Illinois, North Carolina, New Mexico, and New Jersey. There is now more than 5,700 MW of installed solar power capacity in the US, enough to supply more than 940,000 households, according to the report.

Though utilities’ installing of solar power capacity drove 2Q results to their record gains, the US residential solar energy market also contributed a lot, registering its fourth consecutive quarter of growth. Growth in residential solar was incremental, according to the report, with 98.2 MW of new capacity having been installed. California, Arizona, and New Jersey led residential installations nationally. Residential solar installation growth was also strong in Hawaii, Massachusetts, and Maryland.

The latest “US Solar Market Insight” report also shows how rapidly the third-party residential solar ownership model has gained traction across the country. Third-party residential solar installations accounted fro more than 70% of total Q2 installation in major state markets, including California, Arizona, and Colorado.

In California, Q2 marked the first time the cost of a third-party residential solar installation was lower than that of a residential solar PV system purchased outright, according to SEIA and GTM’s research: $5.64 per watt for third-party versus $5.84 per watt for directly-owned solar systems.

In contrast, Q2 solar power installations contracted in the non-residential market segment, which includes commercial, government, and non-profit solar power installations. As a whole, installations fell from 291 MW in Q1 to 196 MW in Q2. Non-residential solar installations contracted sharply in California (down 45%) and New Jersey (down 35%). The decline was broad-based, however.

“Only ten of the 24 states the report tracks individually saw quarterly growth in the non-residential market in Q2 2012,” the report authors elaborate. “This trend was likely due to a combination of factors. In some individual markets such as New Jersey, it was a result of state-market-specific factors such as SREC oversupply. In other states, Q1 2012 had been bolstered by safe-harbored 1603 Treasury Program installations.”

What’s Ahead for US Solar in 2012?

GTM forecasts that the utility photovoltaic (PV) market will continue strong through the remainder of 2012 — their count there are more than 3,400 MW of utility PV projects under construction. The renewable energy news, research, and market data provider anticipates an additional 1.1 gigawatts (GW) of newly installed power capacity to come online before year’s end. In total, the report’s forecast anticipates 3.2 GW of solar PV being installed in the US in 2012. That would be a 71% YoY increase.

SEIA and GTM also anticipate average US system prices will continue to fall. They’ll drop an additional 10% over the remaining course of 2012 as compared to the previous quarter, SEIA and GTM say.

“The U.S. solar industry is rapidly growing and creating jobs across America despite the slow economic recovery,” SEIA president and CEO Rhone Resch stated for the press. “More solar was installed in the U.S. this quarter than in all of 2009, led for the first time by record-setting utility-scale projects.

“With costs continuing to come down, solar is affordable today for more homes, businesses, utilities, and the military. Smart, consistent, long-term policy is driving the innovation and investment that’s making solar a larger share of our overall energy mix.”

Other key findings in SEIA-GTM Research’s Q2 “U.S. Solar Market Insight” report include:

Photovoltaics (PV):

  • PV installations totaled 742 megawatts in Q2 2012, up 45 percent over Q1 2012 and 116 percent over Q2 2011
  • The residential market remained relatively flat in Q2, while the non-residential market shrank 33 percent on a quarterly basis
  • Q2 2012 was the largest quarter ever for utility PV installations, as more than 20 projects were completed, totaling 447 megawatts
  • There is now a cumulative 5,161 megawatts of PV capacity spread amongst nearly 248,000 individual systems operating in the U.S. as of the end of Q2
  • GTM Research forecasts that 3.2 gigawatts of PV will be installed in the U.S. in 2012, up 71 percent over 2011

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP and CPV):

  • Cogentrix’s 30-megawatt-ac CPV Alamosa Solar came on-line
  • Construction progressed at the BrightSource Ivanpah Project, with 92 percent of pylon installation complete at Unit 1 at the end of June
  • Two CSP projects, the 100-megawatt Quartzsite Project and the 100-megawatt Moapa Solar Energy Center, were expedited under President Obama’s “We Can’t Wait” initiative
  • As of the end of Q2 there is a cumulative of 546 megawatts concentrating solar capacity operating in the U.S.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

I've been reporting and writing on a wide range of topics at the nexus of economics, technology, ecology/environment and society for some five years now. Whether in Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Americas, Africa or the Middle East, issues related to these broad topical areas pose tremendous opportunities, as well as challenges, and define the quality of our lives, as well as our relationship to the natural environment.



  • Pingback: Who's Going Solar? 10 of the US' Largest Companies (New List: Top 10 Commercial Solar Users) - CleanTechnica

  • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

    $5.64 per rated watt makes about $25-30 per average watt. Compare last figure to $5/W for nukes in US and $1.5/W in China, producing power on demand. In addition to that, nukes last 60-80 years, and with some upgrading could easily outlive a century, while useful life of PV is about 20 years. Their cost could be justified only by the fact that PV generally produce power in peak hours. To use it for charging e-cars just because you have them instaled on your roof, as people do, strikes me as utter nonsense.

    • Bob_Wallace

      Others are also struck with utter nonsense.

      ” useful life of PV is about 20 years. ”

      The oldest PV installation is now over 30 years old and going strong.

      $5/watt for nuclear is overnight cost. Due to the number of years that it takes to build them realized cost is roughly double that cost.

      Installing PV on your roof and using that electricity to charge your car makes sense to me.

      Let’s assume you drive 12,000 miles a year and live in a 4.5 avg solar hour part of the country (not the sunny part). You’d need about 2.25kW of solar on your roof. After subsidies you could do that for about $4,500 in some places.

      For the next 40 years you’d be driving for a penny a mile. And that price would be locked down for as long as your system lives.

      A penny a mile in a 50 mpg gasmobile would require that you find $0.50/gallon gas for the next 40 years. For that you’d need the way back machine permanently set for about 1965.

      • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

        In France, China, UK, the government asked ingineers what to do. They answered: “Go nuclear,” In US, Germany, the government asked the street. Then housewives started screaming.

        • Bob_Wallace

          predrag, you’re getting a bit unhinged, I’m afraid.

          France is installing a lot of wind and solar. The UK is not likely to build much, if any, new nuclear. China stopped approving new nuclear plants after Fukushima melted down, they might restart the program but what they have done is to greatly accelerate wind and solar installation.

          The citizens of Germany lived with Chernobyl blowing up on their doorstop. They live with continued radiation from that meltdown. They have a lot of reactors built by the same USSR regime and they simply don’t see a need to live with those risks when there are very good alternatives.

          Your opinion seems to be, “Ignore the risk. Ignore the people.”.

          That does not work very well in countries which have some degree of self-government.

          • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

            You are grossly missinformed. China just reassessed its nuc program, switching to more advanced but less proved reactors (AP1000). For them Fuku was a definitive proof of safety of nuc power, as it was. France turning to wind is pure demagoguery. Russian love with atoms has nothing to do with regime, the democratic France and Sweden came to even more nuclear solution. SSSR in fact generated lower share of its power by nukes than USA. If you “ignore the risks, ignore the people” you’ll ignore the nukes, the safest way to generate power. Chernobil took about 100 lives. The equivalent coal-fired plant kills several hundreds of people annually in regular operation. Fukushima didn’t kill anybody, but unecessary evacuations prompted by irational, superstitious fear, killed up to 900 people. Nukes are safe and clean, greens kill by spreading panic. If the planet goes to hell, it will be doomed thanks to well-meaning but ignorant environmentalists manipulated by Big Coal and Big Oil.

          • Bob_Wallace

            March 2011

            “China has suspended approval for new nuclear power stations following the accident at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi plant.

            It will also carry out checks at existing reactors and those under construction.”

            http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-12769392
            China seems to be ready to resume its nuclear program but I’ve seen no notification that it has happened yet.

            “China has increased its national goals for solar deployment, with the National Energy Administration (NEA) calling for 21 GW of solar electric capacity and 400 million square meters of solar thermal collector area by the end of 2015.”
            http://www.energetica-international.com/news/china-increases-solar-targets-to-21-gw-of-electric

            Chernobyl deaths…

            “On the death toll of the accident, the report states that twenty-eight emergency workers (“liquidators”) died from acute radiation syndrome including beta burns and 15 patients died from thyroid cancer in the following years, and it roughly estimated that cancer deaths caused by Chernobyl may reach a total of about 4,000″

            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster#Human_impact

            Luckily for thousands of Russians we can treat some of the cancers that will be produced and hold the Chernobyl death level under 5,000.

            We are not facing a ‘coal or nuclear’ decision. That is a false dichotomy thrown up by the nuclear industry. We are clearly moving to a grid supplied by a mix of renewables and natural gas. Hopefully we’ll be seeing new storage coming on line soon so that we can reduce the role of natural gas.

            Sorry, predrag, that nuclear industry propaganda just does not fly here.

          • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

            Yes, I am fully aware what happens in USA, but you are obviously at a loss when it comes to what happens in the rest, i.e. 95% of world. On top of that, you obviously consulted Queen Anne (the one who died). Antinuclear hysteria is subsiding, cold heads prevail. Experts are taking over, housewives go watch their soap operas.

          • Bob_Wallace

            Yep, you’re right predrag. The world is rushing to build new nuclear plants. It’s happening in 95% of the world’s countries. Nuclear is soaring and renewables are being abandoned by all but hysterical housewives.
            World economies are enjoying adjusting to the higher cost of electricity as they convert from cheaper energy sources to more expensive nuclear. People in 95% of the world are celebrating in the streets from joy over paying more for electricity and having less money to feed their families.

            How could we have missed those astounding, and so obvious, facts?

            Thanks, predrag, you’ve impressed us all….

          • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

            No demonstration in nukes building countries. They are maybe techocratic, but not ruled by hysteric mobs crazed by superstitious fears prodded by special interests of Big Oil and Big Coal, enthusiasticaly supported by useful idiots in the green movement.

          • Bob_Wallace

            Countries with nuclear plants under construction

            China (26)
            Russia (11)
            India (7)
            Republic of Korea (3)

            Two each –
            Slovakian Republic
            Pakistan
            Ukraine
            Taiwan
            Brazil

            One each –
            Argentina
            Brazil
            Finland
            France
            USA

            Fourteen countries currently building nuclear reactors. One
            hundred ninety-six countries.

            14 / 196 * 100 = 95%

            Gosh, thanks for stetting us green idiots straight. We were thinking that the correct answer was 7%. Damn, are we so very stupid….

          • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

            Well said, if US is 5% of humanity, we live in 20-nation world. Congratulations!
            USA is 5% of humanity, and humanity is head count. Otherwise you could compare nuclear China with green Vatican. (Pope Benedict installs PV after refusing AP1000.) Now count population in the nations listed and divide with the total.
            And now, seriously. If we disagree, but are both in honest search of truth, any discussion, even very spirited, makes sense. However, if we try just to fool the oponent, then it’s a fool’s errand. Have a nice day!

          • Bob_Wallace

            If you think the countries listed contain 95% of the world’s population then you bring the numbers. I’m not your research assistant.

            And, thanks for the wish. My day is being very sweet so far….

          • http://twitter.com/krakenaut predrag raos

            Good night.

          • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

            wow, way to slide into a diff argument.

            seriously, look at renewable growth around the world. compare it to nuclear growth. it’s not a match.

            another country i didn’t mention above is Brazil (5th largest in the world). 80% of contracts in a recent power auction were for wind power projects: http://cleantechnica.com/2011/12/22/80-of-contracts-in-latest-brazil-power-auction-are-wind-power/
            is it going nuclear? nope. why not? wind is the cheapest option around. solar beats retail electricity prices. nuclear is expensive, slow to start up (so inefficient to shut down), and has serious risks that come with it.

        • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

          predrag, you’re way off the mark, unfortunately.

          first of all, China is going full speed ahead, in general. it has increased its 2015 solar PV target in the past year and a half from 5 GW to 10 GW to 20 GW to 40 GW. pretty huge changes. meanwhile, it’s nuclear targets are getting pushed further and further into the future. wonder why?

          it’s also installing a ton of wind, btw.

          the UK has a very conservative government in place right now that i’m sure has strong ties to rich folks connected to the nuclear lobby.

          France has stepped off the nuclear gas pedal and is refocusing on renewables.

          please, get your arguments straight before confusing our readers.

Back to Top ↑