Clean Tech Projects Demonstrating the Importance of ‘Low Hanging Fruit’

July 20th, 2012 by Guest Contributor

Given the huge disparity between the contributions made to GHG emissions by the First World when compared with less developed nations, it’s hardly surprising that, a lot of the time, cleantech projects are aimed very much at the West.

Innovations and initiatives such as jet fuels produced from algae, wave disk generator engines, or government incentives for investing in photovoltaic panels, to pick three examples at random, obviously aim to benefit the planet as a whole, but are very much targeted at societies where people have enough disposable income to put money towards flights, cars, and independent energy production.

CO2 emissions image via Shutterstock

Of course, to an extent, this is because only these countries have the resources to fund and carry out the level of R&D that goes into such technologies, but even if this weren’t the case, focusing efforts in this why makes a great deal of sense, especially when we consider that, going by The World Bank’s figures, the average annual per capita CO2 emissions of a US resident is 18 metric tonnes, whilst in a country such as Uganda, it’s only 0.1 tonnes (a mere 0.6% of that American figure.)

However, whilst reducing the energy consumption of a nation that has built its infrastructure around a massive dependence on fossil fuels is a considerable political and cultural challenge, using technology to bring down the already small carbon footprint of a developing nation can be a much more straight forward task.

From a cleantech perspective, developing nations offer ‘low hanging fruit’, where something as simple as the quick-fix of more efficient stove designs can have a large impact on a community’s energy consumption, and, at the same time, greatly increase the quality of life enjoyed in the area. For example, in Kampala, the capital city of Uganda (where 95% of cooking is done using fuel wood) a recent project conducted by Climate Care to disseminate stoves that burn more efficiently has helped reduced the amount of wood needed for fuel by locals, helping to reduce both deforestation and the proportion of income families are forced to spend on fuel.

Likewise, in Ghana, where deforestation is being carried out at one of the highest rates in Africa (thanks largely to charcoal production for cooking), the distribution of insulated stoves, or ‘Gyapas’ as they’re known, has helped families to reduce their charcoal consumption by up to 25%. The project has saved over 72,000 tonnes of CO2 equivalent already, and by 2016 is expected to save in excess of 800,000 tonnes.

Meanwhile, in Afghanistan villages around Badakhshan are having their dependency on kerosene lamps ended by the installation of hydro electric power stations which are managed locally having been built with the help of engineers from Germany working in conjunction with the Afghan government’s Energy Supply for Rural Areas programme, allowing communities to benefit for the first time form a reliable source of electricity, provided in a sustainable way.

Whilst, undoubtedly, people will always see the ultimate end of cleantech to be the discovery of some sort of ‘Holy Grail’ system of energy production that will allow the lifestyles enjoyed in the most prosperous parts of the world to be maintained, it should be remembered that, for much of the world, it’s incredibly simple pieces of technology that stand to make the biggest difference.

Author Bio: Steve Waller writes on a wide range of environmental issues from alternative energy sources to green politics on his site, GreenSteve.com.

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.

Tags: clean cook stoves, clean cooking stoves, dirty cook stoves, Ghana, Ghana cook stoves, Gyapas, stoves

About the Author

Guest Contributor is many, many people. We publish a number of guest posts from experts in a large variety of fields. This is our contributor account for those special people. :D

http://blog.kwiqly.com/ James Ferguson @kWIQly

In my view there is no lower hanging fruit than simply switching off.

If you have access to the engineer in your building (or if you are responsible for the heating plant), try simply having the heating switched off for an hour, or two or more.

You may be surprised how long it can take to become noticeable – in some bigger buildings heating plant may run for months unneeded.

From my experience, with a bit of common sense the potential is enormous and easily seen.

All that is needed is an algorithm to better match supply to necessary demand. Sadly most building lack this most rudimentary technology.
- http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan
  
  Agreed.