CleanTechnica is the #1 cleantech-focused
website
 in the world. Subscribe today!


Buildings SC_DavisMonthanAFB_Residences

Published on July 17th, 2012 | by Chelsea

9

U.S. Military Adding Solar Roofs to More Base Housing

Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

July 17th, 2012 by  

 

Great news on solar power: More eco-friendly military housing is on the horizon. Today, SolarCity announced that three more solar panel rooftop projects will be added to Air Force bases in California and Colorado later this summer. The additional bases are a part of SolarStrong, a $1-billion solar installation project.

SolarCity, partnered with property developer Lend Lease, plans to provide solar power to more than 850 privatized military homes in Los Angeles and Colorado Springs. The five-year project is aiming to create up to 300 megawatts of solar power for as many as 120,000 military housing units across the U.S. If completed, SolarStrong would be the largest solar project in America.

Solar power projects are already underway or completed at Hickam Communities at Joint Base Pearl Harbor and Soaring Heights Community at Tucson’s Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, pictured above.

About 4 megawatts of solar power will be installed at Hickam Communities by 2013 — we’ve got more on that project coming in a few hours.

Davis-Monthan AFB installed 6 megawatts of solar power in December 2010 in the form of ground mounts and rooftops. Another 14.5 megawatts will be generated by solar panels covering 130 acres of land at two locations around Davis-Monthan.

Reduced Waste, Increased Savings

Fitting homes and underutilized land with solar panels is a progressive energy and financial strategy for the Department of Defense. While politicians quibble over how to reduce government spending, the Department of Defense — the single-largest energy consumer in the U.S. — is heading in the right direction with renewable energy sources like solar panels.

An exciting example of increased savings from solar is at Davis-Monthan: “The solar PV project is expected to provide approximately 35 percent of the base electricity requirements, reducing base utilities cost by an average of $500,000 annually.” Sounds like the Tucson Air Force base is meeting its goal to “Think green, build green, and fly blue.”

Source: SolarCity
Image: Lend Lease

Keep up to date with all the hottest cleantech news by subscribing to our (free) cleantech newsletter, or keep an eye on sector-specific news by getting our (also free) solar energy newsletter, electric vehicle newsletter, or wind energy newsletter.



Share on Google+Share on RedditShare on StumbleUponTweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on FacebookPin on PinterestDigg thisShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someone

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


About the Author

is a former newspaper reporter who has spent the past few years teaching English in Poland, Finland and Japan. When she wasn't teaching or writing, Chelsea was traveling Europe and Asia, sampling spicy street food along the way.



  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000164147137 Sherri Gallant

    Hopefully they did not buy all those solar panels from CHINA

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PKBLDBYWRPMI7N3DTPQIZJJQTM Nuclear

    Good, good, good.  Military knows fully the cost of Oil as they are fighting hard in the Persian Gulf,  
       Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia –  all a bunch of zealots holding on to Oil.
       Also Saudi Arabia could not produce as much as they promised.

    Meanwhile cost of solar power continues to drop and it now stands at 76 cents / watt.
    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/analysis-u-solar-tariffs-not-204842702.html 

  • Tygerklaw

    Are the panels being leased from Halliburton?

    • http://cleantechnica.com/ Zachary Shahan

      Huh?

  • Pingback: SolarCity, Lend Lease extend rooftop solar program for US air force - reneweconomy.com.au : Renew Economy

  • Marcus Johannson

    I agree with Matthew, with the leasing model the military is not receiving the full benefit that they would otherwise receive if they owned the panels.

    • Bob_Wallace

      Does leasing get more panels on roofs and cut utility costs to more military service people faster?

      (I’m assuming a non-bottomless bucket of cash available for this project. Putting solar on rooftops is not as important as building jet fighters that the Air Force says that is doesn’t need and doesn’t want, doncha know?)

  • Pingback: U.S. Air Force Gets Solar Power from SolarCity, Continues Clean Energy Push - CleanTechnica

  • http://twitter.com/MatthewLRose Matthew Rose

    I don’t like the use of a leasing company, these panels & systems should be owned outright by the military.

    Does Solar City source American made panels or at the very least source them for government installations?

Back to Top ↑